Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2008
The availability of high technology designed to preserve human life, places medical practitioners in a set of ethical dilemmas. In particular the use of Intensive Care Units to sustain acutely seriously ill elderly people is a matter of widespread debate. An examination of the medical research literature suggests that such interventions are largely successful and wished for by the patient, but the quality of surviving life is for some, unacceptable. It is concluded that the maintance of life should remain the predominant rule, but that where patient and clinical judgement indicates it, death should be accepted as the natural course.
1 Robertson, G. S.Ethical dilemmas of brain failure in the elderly. British Medical Journal, 287 (1983), 1775–1777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Thompson, E. G. and Eastwood, M. R.Survivorship and senile dementia. Age and Ageing, 10 (1981), 29–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Lynn, J.Dying and dementia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 256 (1986), 2244–2245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Cohen, J.Personal view. British Medical Journal, 294 (1987), 767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Dawson, J.Easeful death. British Medical Journal, 293 (1987), 1187–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Tindall, G.High-tech medicine: when to say no. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 79 (1986), 56–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Knaus, W.Too sick and old for intensive care. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 37 (1987), 381.Google ScholarPubMed
8 ‘Hospital in-patient enquiry’, quoted in Ashley, J., Anatomy of a Hospital, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
9 Baron, J. and Bush, A.An inner city general medical ward round in the mid 1980s. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 80 (1987), 547–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Reznik, R., Ring, I., Fletcher, P. and Siskind, V.Differences in mortality from acute myocardial infarction between coronary care unit and medical ward: treatment or bias? British Medical Journal, 295 (1987), 1437–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Anonymous. Vital decision. British Medical Journal 3 (1967), 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Linn, B. S. and Yurt, R. W.Cardiac arrest among geriatric patients. British Medical Journal, 2 (1970), 25–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Anonymous, Cardiac resuscitation in hospital: more restraint needed? Lancet, i (1982), 27–28.Google Scholar
14 Bedell, S. E., Delbanco, T. L., Cook, E. F. and Epstein, F. H.Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. New England Journal of Medicine, 309 (1983). 569–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Bayer, A. J., Ang, B. C. and Pathy, M. S. J.Cardiac arrests in a geriatric unit. Age and Ageing, 14 (1985), 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Fusgen, I. and Summa, F. D.How much sense is there in an attempt to resuscitate an aged person? Gerontology, 24 (1978), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Gunasekera, M. P. R., Tiller, D. J., Clements, L. T. S.-J. and Bhattacharya, B. K.Elderly patients views on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Age and Ageing, 15 (1986), 364–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Wagner, A.CPR in the Aged. New England Journal of Medicine, 310 (1984), 1129–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Castagna, J., Well, M. H. and Shubin, H.Factors determining survival in cardiac arrest. Chest, 65, (1974), 527–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Wildsmith, J. A. W., Dennyson, W. G. and Myers, K. W.Results of resuscitation following cardiac arrest: a review from a major teaching hospital. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 44 (1972), 716–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Coni, N. and Clark, J.Active treatment of the active old. Update, 30 (1985), 1199–1205.Google Scholar
22 Tapson, J. S., Rodger, R. S. C., Mansy, H., Elliott, R. W., Ward, M. K. and Wilkinson, R.Renal replacement therapy in patients aged over 60 years. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 63 (1987), 1071–1077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Salem, R., Devitt, P., Johnson, J. and Firmin, R.Emergency geriatric surgical admissions. British Medical Journal, 2 (1978), 416–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Greenburg, A. G., Salk, R. P. and Pridham, D.Influence of age on mortality of colon surgery. American Journal of Surgery, 150 (1985), 65–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Pollock, A. V. and Evens, M.Major abdominal operations on patients aged 80 and over: an audit. British Medical Journal, 295 (1987), 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Lewis, A. A. M. and Khoury, G. A.Resection for colorectal cancer in the very old: are the risks too high? British Medical Journal, 296 (1988), 459–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Wei, J. Y., Gersh, B. J.Heart disease in the elderly. Current Problems in Cardiology, 12 (1987), 1–65.Google ScholarPubMed
28 Gersh, B. J., Kronmal, R. A., Schaff, H. V. et al. Coronary artery surgery study. New England Journal of Medicine, 313 (1985), 217–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Gersh, B. J., Kronmal, R. A., Schaff, H. V. et al. ‘Long-term (5 year) results of coronary bypass surgery in patients 65 years old or older: a report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study’, in Loop, F. D. (ed.), Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association Monograph Number 99Google Scholar, Circulation 68, 11 (1982), 190–199.
30 Yacoub, M. 37th Annual Scientific Session of the American Journal of Cardiology, 1988.Google Scholar
31 Currie, C. T.Doctors and ageism. British Medical Journal, 295 (1987), 1586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Bayliss, R. I. S.Thou shalt not strive officiously. British Medical Journal, 285 (1982), 1373–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Fox, R. A. ‘Palliative care and aggressive therapy’, in Elford, R. J. (ed.), Medical Ethics and Elderly People, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1987, pp. 152–176.Google Scholar
34 Levinsky, N. G.Fighting for life. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 34 (1986), 666–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35 Watts, D. T., Cassel, C. K. and Hickam, D. H.Nurses and physicians attitudes towards tube feeding decisions in long-term care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 34 (1986), 607–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Micetich, K. C., Steinecker, P. H. and Thomasma, D. C.Are intravenous fluids morally required for a dying patient? Archives of Internal Medicine, 143 (1983), 975–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Leading article. Terminal dehydration. Lancet, i (1986), 306.Google Scholar
38 Yudkin, J. S., Doyal, L. T. and Hurwitz, B. S.Interpreting survival rates for the treatment of decompensated diabetes: are we saving too many lives? Lancet, ii (1987). 1192–1195.Google Scholar
39 Emanuel, E. J.What criteria should guide decision makers for incompetent patients? Lancet, i (1988), 170–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Jennett, B.Decisions to limit treatment. Lancet, ii (1987), 787–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41 Kapila, H., Coni, N. K. and Kapila, M. (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
42 Higgs, R.Living wills and treatment refusal. British Medical Journal, 295 (1987), 1221–1222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 Callahan, D.Adequate health care and an aging society: are they morally compatible? ‘Daedalus’ (Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 115), 1986, pp. 247–267.Google ScholarPubMed
44 Thomasma, D. C.Quality of life judgements, treatment decisions, and medical ethics in geriatric medicine and social policy. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2 (1986), 17–27.Google Scholar
45 Callahan, D.Setting Limits. Simon and Schuster, New York; 1987.Google Scholar
46 Silver, G. A.The old, the very old and the too old. Lancet, ii (1987), 1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Somers, A. R.Insurance for long-term care. New England Journal of Medicine, 317 (1987). 23–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48 Avern, J. L.Medicine, health and the geriatric transformation. ‘Daedalus’ (Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 115), 1986, pp. 247–267.Google Scholar
49 Yarborough, M. A. and Kramer, A. M.The physician and resource allocation in ethical issues in the care of the elderly. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2 (1986), 465–480.Google Scholar
50 Haber, P. A. L.High technology in geriatric care in ethical issues in the care of the elderly. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2 (1986), 491–500.Google Scholar