Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:46:35.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ageing in Rural Communities: Family Contacts and Community Integration†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

G. Clare Wenger
G. Clare Wenger
Affiliation:
Social Services in Rural Areas Research Project, Department of Social Theory and Institutions, University College of North Wales, Bangor, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on a study of the elderly in rural communities, the paper makes comparisons with data from more urban studies in the U.K. The findings indicate that while availability of and contact with family members is comparable, satisfaction with the amount of contact is considerably higher in the rural context. This higher level of satisfaction holds even for retired migrants who have less contact. It is suggested that satisfaction may be higher because needs for contact are met by a greater variety of other forms of association and support. The data demonstrate that the rural elderly do in fact have higher levels of contact with neighbours; are more likely to belong to voluntary associations; are more likely to belong to a religious group and to be visited by the clergy, and are more likely to become involved in sparetime activities which enhance the likelihood for social contact. Dependency on family, therefore, appears to be lower. While rural communities do not appear to preserve family cohesion, opportunities for community integration are enhanced and are reflected in higher levels of satisfaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 1982 , pp. 211 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Auerbach, A. J. ‘The elderly in rural areas: differences in urban areas and implications for practice’. In Ginsberg, L. H. (ed.), Social Work in Rural Communities, New York, Council on Social Work Education, 1976.Google ScholarBritton, J. H., Mather, W. G. and Lansing, A. K. ‘Expectations for older persons in a rural community: work and retirement’, Geriatrics, 16, 1961, pp. 664–671.Google ScholarBritton, J. H., Mather, W. G. and Lansing, A. K. ‘Expectations for older persons in a rural community: living arrangements and family relationships’, J. Gerontology, 16, 1961, 156–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBultena, G. L. and Wood, V. ‘Normative attitudes toward the aged role among migrant and non-migrant retirees’, Gerontologist, 9, 1969, pp. 204–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarKivett, V. R. ‘Discriminators of loneliness among the rural elderly: implications for intervention’, The Gerontologist, 19 (1), 1979, pp. 108–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedKivett, V. R. and Maxheamver, R. ‘Perspectives on the childless rural elderly: a comparative analysis’, The Gerontologist, 20, 6, 1980, p. 708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedSauer, W. J., Shenan, C. and Boymel, C. ‘Rural-urban differences in satisfaction among the elderly’, Rural Sociology, 41 (2), 1976, 269 et. seq.Google ScholarSchooler, K. ‘A comparison of rural and non-rural elderly on selected variables’ in Atchley, R. C. (ed.), Rural Environments and Ageing, Washington, D.C., Gerontological Society, 1975, pp. 27–42.Google ScholarYoumens, E. G. ‘The rural aged’, Annals American Acadamy of Social and Political Sciences, 449, 1977, pp. 81–90.Google Scholar

2 White, David. ‘The Village Life’, New Society, 29, 265, 1974, pp. 790–794.Google Scholar

3 Russell, Anthony J.The Village in Myth and Reality, London, Chester House Publications, 1975.Google Scholar

4 Tönnies, Ferdinand. Community and Society, trans. Loomis, Charles, New York, Harper Books, 1957.Google Scholar

5 Redfield, Robert. The Little Community, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

6 Frankenberg, Ronald. Communities in Britain: Social Life in Town and Country, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1966.Google Scholar

7 Rees, Alwyn D.Life in a Welsh Countryside, Cardiff, University of Wales Press, 1950.Google ScholarJenkins, D.Welsh Rural Communities (Ed.), Davies, Elwyn and Rees, Alwyn D., Cardiff, University of Wales Press, 1960.Google ScholarWilliams, W. M.The Sociology of an English Village: Gosforth, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956.Google ScholarWilliams, W. M.A West Country Village: Ashworthy, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956.Google ScholarDennis, N., Henriques, F. M. and Slaughter, C.Coal is our life, London, Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1957.Google Scholar

8 Laslett, Peter. The World we have Lost, London, Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1965.Google Scholar

9 Schumacher, E. F.Small is beautiful: study of economics as if people mattered, London, Blond and Briggs, 1973.Google Scholar

10 Townsend, Peter. The family life of old people, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.Google ScholarBlau, Zena Smith. Old age in a changing society, New York, Franklin Watts Inc., 1973.Google ScholarLebowitz, Barry. ‘Old age and family functioning’, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 1, 2, 1980, pp. 111–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarShanas, Ethel. ‘The family and social class’ in Shanas, (eds.), Old people in three industrial societies, New York, Atherton Press, 1968.Google ScholarShanas, Ethel. ‘The elderly: family bureaucracy and family help patterns’. Paper presented Vichy, France, 1977.Google ScholarShanas, Ethel. ‘Older parents middle-aged children’, paper presented to the XIIth International Congress of Gerontology, Hamburg, July 12–17, 1981.Google ScholarAdams, G.Kinship in an Urban Setting, Chicago, Markham Pub. Co., 1967.Google ScholarRosser, C. and Harris, C.The family and social change, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMaeda, D. ‘A study of the attitude toward old people and the sense of responsibility for the aged parents’, paper presented to the XIIth International Congress of Gerontology, Hamburg, July 12–17, 1981.Google Scholar

11 Hunt, Audrey. The Elderly at Home: a study of people aged sixty-five and over living in the community in England in 1976. London OPCS, Social Survey Division, H.M.S.O., 1978.Google Scholar

12 Abrams, Mark. Beyond three-score and ten: A first report on a survey of the elderly, Mitcham, Surrey, Age Concern Research Publications, 1978.Google ScholarAbrams, MarkBeyond three-score and ten: A second report on a survey of the elderly, Mitcham, Surrey, Age Concern Research Publications, 1980.Google Scholar

13 Wenger, G. Clare. The Elderly in the Community: family contacts, social integration and community involvement, Working Paper 18, Social Services in Rural Areas Research Project, University College of North Wales, Bangor, 1981.Google ScholarTownsend, Peter. The family life of old people, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.Google ScholarKivett, V. R. and Maxheamver, R. ‘Perspectives on the childless rural elderly: a comparative analysis’, The Gerontologist, 20, 6, p. 708, 1980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

14 Wenger, G. Clare. The Elderly in the Community: family contacts, social integration and community involvement, Working Paper 18, Social Services in Rural Areas Research Project, University College of North Wales, Bangor, 1981.Google ScholarWenger, G. Clare. The Elderly in the Community: mobility and access to services, Working Paper 16, Social Services in Rural Areas Research Project, University College of North Wales, Bangor, 1981.Google Scholar

15 Spakes, Patricia R. ‘Family, friendship and community integration as related to life satisfaction of the elderly’, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarKutner, B. ‘The social nature of ageing’, The Gerontologist, 2, pp. 5–8, 1962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarHellebrandt, Frances A. ‘Ageing among the advantaged: a new look at the stereotype of the elderly’, The Gerontologist, 20, 4, 1980, pp. 404–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarCreecy, R. F. ‘Environmental and structural effects on the friendships, social integration and morale of the aged’. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1976.Google ScholarBennett, John and Despres, Leo. ‘Kinship structure and instrumental activities: a theoretical inquiry’, American Anthropologist, LXII, 1960, pp. 254–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarWindley, P. ‘Environmental intervention: case studies in independent living among the rural elderly’, Gerontological Society, Summer Research Fellowship Program, Washington, D.C., 1977.Google ScholarSmith, Blau Zena. Old Age in a Changing Society, New York, Franklin Watts Inc., 1973.Google ScholarWood, V. and Robertson, J. F. ‘Friendship and kinship interaction: differential effect on the morale of the elderly’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40 (2), 1978, pp. 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Litwak, E. and Szelenyi, I. ‘Primary group structures and their functioning: kin, neighbours and friends’, Am. Soc. Dev. 1969, 34, pp. 465–481, 1980.Google Scholar

17 Spakes, Patricia R. ‘Family, friendship and community integration as related to life satisfaction of the elderly’, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 1, 4.Google Scholar

18 Rosow, I.Social Integration of the Aged, New York, Free Press, 1967.Google ScholarKarn, Valerie. Retiring to the seaside, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar