Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:54:15.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adult children and parental care-giving: making sense of participation patterns among siblings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2010

ANU M. LEINONEN
ANU M. LEINONEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
*
Address for correspondence: Anu Leinonen, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35 (Agora), Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä 40014, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse 20 Finnish working carers' perceptions of their sibling relations and the sharing of the responsibility for parental care. The main focus is on the interviewees' rationales for the participation or non-participation of their siblings in the parents' care. Almost all the interviewed carers stated that the division of care responsibilities is unequal and that they are the primary carers, but the majority did not convey any clear intention to try to persuade their siblings to increase their participation in parental care. In many cases, the siblings were described either as entirely absent or as providing occasional backup, but some interviewees reported that caring for the parent(s) was shared with their other siblings. Consequently, three participation patterns were identified: ‘absence’, ‘backup’ and ‘togetherness’. All the interviewees offered rationales for the unequal division of care tasks and responsibilities among the siblings. The discussion focuses on these rationales and their variations by participation patterns, and considers the similarity of the findings to those from previous American and British studies. The study concludes that social-care services should take the primary carer's siblings into consideration, although not always as a ‘resource’. It should not be taken for granted or assumed that the primary care-giver receives help from her or his siblings, even if their relationship is otherwise close and unproblematic.

Keywords

parental care-givingsibling relationshipsfamily careold age care
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , February 2011 , pp. 308 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chambers, P., Allan, G., Phillipson, C. and Ray, M. 2009. Family Practices in Later Life. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Connidis, I. A. and Kemp, C. L. 2008. Negotiating actual and anticipated parental support: multiple sibling voices in three-generation families. Journal of Aging Studies 22, 3, 229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J. 1989. Family Obligations and Social Change. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1990. Filial obligations and kin support for elderly people. Ageing & Society, 10, 2, 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1993. Negotiating Family Responsibilities. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Giele, J. Z. and Elder, G. H. (eds)1998. Methods of Life Course Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, C. and Kemp, P. A. 2006. Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the Welfare State. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Hequembourg, A. and Brallier, S. 2005. Gendered stories of parental caregiving among siblings. Journal of Aging Studies 19, 1, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Neal, M. B., Ha, J. and Hammer, L. B. 2003. Redressing inequity in parent care among siblings. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 1, 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, L., Sundström, G. and Hassing, L. B. 2003. State provision down, offspring's up: the reverse substitution of old-age care in Sweden. Ageing & Society, 23, 3, 269–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kröger, T. 2005. Interplay between formal and informal care for older people: the state of the Nordic research. In Szebehely, M. (eds), Äldreomsorgsforskning i Norden. En kunskapsöversikt [Research on Care for Older People in the Nordic Countries: State of the Art]. TemaNord 508, Nordisk ministerråd, Copenhagen, 243–80.Google Scholar
Lashewicz, B. and Keating, N. 2009. Tensions among siblings in parent care. European Journal of Ageing, 6, 2, 127–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leinonen, A. 2009. Tutkittavana työssäkäynnin ja omaishoivan yhdistäminen: keskiarvoja, kokemuksia ja käsitteellistämisen tarpeita [Research on combining caring and working: numbers, experiences and need of conceptualisations]. Gerontologia, 23, 1, 14–22.Google Scholar
Luescher, K. and Pillemer, K. 1998. Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent–child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 2, 413–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvasti, A. B. 2003. Qualitative Research in Sociology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. H. 2002. Sisters and Brothers/Daughters and Sons: Meeting the Needs of Old Parents. Unlimited Publishing, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Ogg, J. and Renaut, S. 2006. The support of parents in old age by those born during 1945–1954: a European perspective. Ageing & Society, 26, 5, 723–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. and Geissler, B. 2005. Care and Social Integration in European Societies. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Settersten, R. A. 2003. Invitation to the Life Course: Toward New Understandings of Later Life. Baywood, Amityville, New York.Google Scholar
Statistics Finland 2009. Kokonaishedelmällisyysluku 1900–2008 [Total Fertility Rate 1900–2008]. Statistics Finland, Helsinki. Available online at http://www.stat.fi/til/synt/2008/synt_2008_2009-04-22_kuv_002_en.html [Accessed 11 April 2010].Google Scholar
Statistics Finland 2010. Työvoimatutkimus 2010 [Labour Force Survey 2010]. Statistics Finland, Helsinki. Available online at http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/2010/02/tyti_2010_02_2010-03-23_tau_011_en.html [Accessed 11 April 2010].Google Scholar
Stuifbergen, M. C., van Delden, J. M. and Dykstra, P. A. 2008. The implications of today's family structures for support giving to older parents. Ageing & Society 28, 3, 413–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szebehely, M. and Trydegård, G.-B. 2007. Omsorgstjänster för äldre och funktionshindrade: skilda villkor, skilda trender? [Services for older and disabled persons: different trends, different conditions?]. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 14, 2/3, 197–219.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, P., Kauppinen, S., Heinola, R., Finne-Soveri, H., Sinervo, T., Kattainen, E., Topo, P. and Andersson, S. 2007. Ikääntyneiden palvelut [A review of developments in home care for older people]. In Heikkilä, M. and Lahti, T. (eds), Sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon palvelukatsaus 2007 [Review of Social Welfare and Health Care Services in 2007]. Stakes, Helsinki, 154–91.Google Scholar
Williams, F. 2001. In and beyond New Labour: towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21, 4, 467–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willyard, J., Miller, K., Shoemaker, M. and Addison, P. 2008. Making sense of sibling responsibility for family caregiving. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 12, 1676–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeandle, S. and Buckner, L. 2007. Carers, Employment and Services: Time for a New Social Contract? Report 6, Carers, Employment and Services Report Series, Carers UK, London.Google Scholar