Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:00:07.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sources of Urban Concentration in the Nigerian Countryside1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Extract

One of the earliest and most systematic studies of urban concentrations in Nigeria was made by Mabogunje (1968) who found that historically, there have been two main types of such concentrations. First, there were pre-industrial and pre-colonial urban settlements which grew as centers of import and export trade and commerce involving gold, salt, pepper, minerals, craft products, textiles, gunpowder, slaves, coral beads, ivory, horses, and manufactured goods. Second, colonial and postcolonial industrialized centers offered urban context for population concentration. In a broad sense, these two categories correspond to the African Type A and Type B town formations presented by Southall (1961: 6-13).

By their 1917 Township Ordinance in Nigeria, the British Colonial Government established first, second and third class categories of townships on the basis of which population, utilities and services, including water supply, roads, and electricity, were provided. Such basic infrastructures produced changes in the economic foundations of the township and facilitated the work of increasing numbers of administrators and professionals. Apart from rearranging the economic, political, and administrative spatial integration of these townships, the new developments increased the use of urban technologies thereby attracting further population growth.

The two categories of urban population concentrations referred to above may merely be regarded as dated analytical distinctions because in the contemporary Nigerian situation, the pre-colonial, pre-industrial features in any one town vary in content in comparison with the post-colonial industrial characteristics; both co-exist and the latter may be regarded as extensions and revivals of the former. On the basis of this insight, it is obvious that there are several sources of urban population concentrations in Nigeria, each center having its own peculiar cluster of spatial, socio-economic, and socio-political characteristics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

Paper presented at the Symposium on Small Urban Centers Revisited: The Place of Small Towns in the General Urbanization of Africa, at the African Studies Program 25th Anniversary Celebration, University of Wisconsin-Madison. October 29 to November 2, 1986.

I am grateful to the Senate Research Grants Committee, University of Ibadan, for financing my fieldwork revisits to Okitipupa, and to the Centre for Development Studies, Unviersity of Bergen, Norway, for providing the facilities for the completion of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Dike, A.A. 1979. “Growth and Development Patterns of Awka and Nsukka,” Africa 49/3: 235–45.Google Scholar
Mabogunje, Akin L. 1968. Urbanization in Nigeria. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, B.J.A. 1932. “Assessment Report on the Ikale District,” Okitipupa Division, Ondo Province.Google Scholar
Nigeria, Government of. 1963. Census of Nigeria, Western Region, Vol II.Google Scholar
Otite, O. 1979. “Rural Migrants as Catalysts in Rural Development, The Urhobo in Ondo State, Nigeria,” Africa 49/3: 226–34.Google Scholar
Southall, Aidan. 1961. Social Change in Modern Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1982. Estimates and Projections of Urban, Rural and City Populations 1950-2025, The 1980 Assessment. New York.Google Scholar