Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:10:12.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Professionalization Amidst Change: The Case of the Emerging Legal Profession in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Extract

This paper is an attempt to examine the development of a profession on a western model in a developing, non-western society. It attempts to examine the relationship of the colonial social and political environment to the development of the legal profession in Kenya; and also the relationship of the post-colonial social and political environment to the changes occurring in that development. The paper proceeds on the assumption that like any occupation, the legal profession in Kenya has a history and that history, specifically the history of change from the colonial to the post-colonial social and political environment, has determined some aspects of the profession's structure (Stinchcombe, 1965: 153-54).

The literature of occupational sociology is especially rich in its treatment of one prominent category—the professions. The central theme in this literature has come to be the professional model, conceived as an ideal-type that permits comparisons between the abstract model and actual professions. The model is said to consist of a series of attributes which are deemed important in distinguishing professions from non-professional occupations. The attributes are conveniently categorized into two basic types: those that are part of the structure of the occupation and those which reflect the attitudes of the practitioners about their work (Hall, 1968). Wilensky (1964: 194) identified the structural attributes as: the creation of a full-time occupation out of the work done, the establishment of a training model reflecting the knowledge base of a profession, the formation of a professional association, and the formation of a code of ethics. The attitudinal attributes have been identified as belief in self-regulation (Greenwood, 1957: 44-55). the belief in autonomy (Scott, 1965), the use of a professional association as a major reference (Goode, 1957: 194), and the possession of a sense of calling to the field (Gross, 1958: 77-82). Although criticized (Johnson, 1972: 1973; Roth, 1974: 7-25), the professional model has come to gain some acceptance in the literature of occupational sociology as the ideal type measuring tool used to determine how far along the professionalization path a particular occupation has moved. Movement toward correspondence with the model is what is generally considered to constitute the process of professionalization (Vollmer and Mills, 1966).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, H. E. and Pfeffer, J.. (1976) “Environments of Organizations” in Inkeles, et al (eds) Annual Review of Sociology.Google Scholar
Carlin, Jerome. (1966) Lawyers on their own: A Study of Individual Practitioners in Chicago. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, E. B. Jr. (1977) “Sources of Social-Political Instability in an African state: The Case of Kenya's Educated Unemployed.” African Studies Review, 20, 1 (April): 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghai, Y. P. and McAuslan, J. P. W. B.. (1970) Public Law and Political Change in Kenya: A study of the Legal Framework of Government from Colonial Times to the Present, Nairobi: Oxford University Press, 381406.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. (1957) “Community Within a Community: The Professions.” American Sociological Review 22 (April): 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, E. (1957) “Attributes of a Profession.” Social Work 2 (July): 4555.Google Scholar
Gross, E. A. (1958) Work and Society. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell Company.Google Scholar
Hall, R. H. (1968) “Professionalization and Bureaucratization.” American Sociological Review 33 (February): 92104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T.J. (1972) Professions and Power. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. J. (1973) “Imperialism and the Professions: Notes on the Development of Professional Occupations in Britain's Colonies and the New States.” The Sociological Review Monograph No. 20 (December), University of Keele.Google Scholar
Marris, P. and Somerset, T.. (1971) African Businessman: A Study of Entrepreneurship and Development in Kenya, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Muga, E. (1975) Crime and Delinquency in Kenya, Nairobi. East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
Njonjo, C. (1974) The Daily Nation (Nairobi): 29 March.Google Scholar
Roth, J. A. (1974) “Professionalism: The Sociologists' Decoy.” Sociology of Work and Occupations 1: 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. (1965) “Reaction to Supervision in a Heteronomous Professional Organization.” Administrative Science Quarterly 10 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shikuku, M. (1974) The Daily Nation (Nairobi) 29 March.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965) “Social Structure and Organizations” in March, J. G. (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Vollmer, H. and Mills, D.. (1966) Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. (1964) “The Professionalization of Everyone.” American Journal of Sociology 70 (September): 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar