Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:21:19.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Professional and Personal Effects of the American Fulbright Experience in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Extract

The Fulbright Program, initiated in 1945, is one of the oldest U.S. overseas exchange programs. The overall goal of the program, since its inception, has been to increase mutual understanding among peoples through the living and working experiences of the scholars and students involved. In Africa the most important subsidiary goal is to strengthen African universities through provision of training and research opportunities for Africans and through the American Fulbright professors who work at those universities (Huff, 1986).

Of all the components of the program, the American Fulbright Senior Scholar, the key element in the program, has been an unstudied aspect. A mystique has surrounded the scholars selected for the program. It has been assumed that with purposeful selection of scholars and careful matching of overseas sites, program goals will be accomplished abroad and in the United States and that the appropriate motivational elements are in place to accomplish and sustain the changes made. Occasionally, the consequences abroad have been documented and evaluated, but little is known of the professional and personal effects of the Fulbright experience on the returned American Fulbrighter.

As an individual, the American Fulbrighter participates in an intensive experience, lengthy enough to produce potentially fundamental changes in the participant. Teaching and being involved in other academic duties overseas has generally been assumed to be a very positive experience. However, what evidence demonstrates the extent the goals of the program were accomplished with regard to the U.S. participant?

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aber, C. 1972The Application of Herzberg's Motivation-Hygiene Theory to College Educators as Tested by Two Different Methodologies.” Ann Arbor: Dissertation Abstracts 2979-A.Google Scholar
Altback, P. G. 1980The Crisis of the Professorate.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 448: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association of University Professors. 1982Affirmative Action Plans.” Academe 68/1: 5A20A.Google Scholar
American Association of University Professors 1983The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession 1982-83.” Academe 69/4: 375.Google Scholar
Ammerman, W. 1984The Fulbright Program: A Quiet Efficient Success.” Phi Delta Kappan 65:421–22.Google Scholar
Bergquist, W. H., and Phillips, S. R. 1977 A Handbook for Faculty Development. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: The Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges.Google Scholar
Brady, M. 1974 Levels of Involvement: An Impressionistic Study of the Experiences of Sixty American Fulbrighters in Western Europe. Oxford, Ohio: Miami University.Google Scholar
Central Research Services. 1958 Evaluation of Japanese Returned Fulbright Grantees. Tokyo: Central Research Services.Google Scholar
Cooper, T. H. 1980Special Problems of the Professor of Higher Education.” Review of Higher Education 41: 2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. H., Strand, R., Alexander, L. T., and Hussain, M. N. 1982The Impact of Organizational and Innovative Variables on Instructional Innovation in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education 53/5: 568–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E., Ryan, R. 1982Intrinsic Motivation to Teach: Possibilities and Obstacles in Our Colleges and Universities.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 10: 2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudden, A. and Dynes, R., eds. 1987 The Fulbright Experience 1946-1986. Encounters and Transformations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Freedman, M., ed. 1973 Facilitating Faculty Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gullahorn, J. T. and Gullahorn, J. E. 1958 Professional and Social Consequences of Fulbright and Smith-Mundt Awards. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Gullahorn, J. T. and Gullahorn, J. E. 1960 International Educational Exchange: An Assessment of Professional and Social Contributions by American Fulbright and Smith-Mundt Grantees, 1947-1957. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Huff, C. 1986 Academic Exchanges with Africa, Fiscal Year 1986. Washington, DC: United States Information Agency.Google Scholar
Jabker, E. H. and Halinski, R. S. 1978Instructional Development and Faculty Rewards.” Journal of Higher Education 49/4: 316–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, G. 1985Unique Fulbright Follow-up.” The Fulbrighters' Newsletter 9/Spring: 23.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. and Colligan, F. 1965 The Fulbright Program: A History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. and Ezekiel, R. 1970 Cross National Encounters. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Kraft, B. 1984Scholars Hail Rewards of Teaching Overseas but Warn that Planning Ahead is Essential.” Chronicle of Higher Education 4 04: 2124.Google Scholar
Laves, W. 1961 Toward a National Effort in International Educational and Cultural Affairs. Washington, DC: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Educational Exchange.Google Scholar
Macgregor, G. 1962 The Experiences of American Scholars in Countries of the Near East and Southern Asia. Ithaca, NY: Society for Applied Anthropology.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. 1954 Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
McKeachie, W. J. 1982The Rewards of Teaching.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 10: 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, H. and Orenstein, F. 1956A Survey of Fulbright Award Recipients: Cross-Cultural Education and its Impacts.” Public Opinion Quarterly 19/3: 401407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. 1952 Educational Exchanges, Aspects of the American Experience. Washington, D. C: National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council.Google Scholar
Pyle, C. 1985Letter to the Editor: ‘The Goals and Purposes of the Fulbright Program’,”. Chronicle of Higher Education 4 11: 5.Google Scholar
Rone, P. 1976 Academic Sojourners: A Report on the Senior Fulbright Programs in East Asia and the Pacific. Northampton, MA: Smith College.Google Scholar
Rudolph, F. 1984The Power of Professors: The Impact of Specialization and Professionallzation on the Curricula.” Change 16/4: 1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. and Zelasny, M. 1982Human Needs and Faculty Motivation.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 10: 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoot, J. 1985Letter to the Editor: ‘The Goals and Purposes of the Fulbright Program’,” Chronicle of Higher Education 4 11: 4849.Google Scholar
Togutz, G. E. and Nelson, K. T. 1983Financial Exigency, Compliance and Professional Seniority: A Multidimensional Model.” Journal of College and University Personnel Association 34/1: 2629.Google Scholar
U.S. Embassy, India. 1953 The Exchange of Persons: An Evaluation of the Experiences and Training of Individual Grantees. New Delhi: U.S. Embassy.Google Scholar
Watkins, B. 1985a “Fulbright Scholars Say They're Ignored Whey They Return to the United States.” Chronicle of Higher Education 5 06: 2123.Google Scholar
Watkins, B. 1985b “‘The Fulbrights,’ Prestigious and Romantic are Having Trouble Luring Young Scholars.” Chronicle of Higher Education 5 11: 2325.Google Scholar
Watkins, E. 1986Exchange Program Gives Professors a Breather from Academic Routine.” Chronicle of Higher Education 32/10: 2728.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. 1955Evaluating the Exchange Experience.” News Bulletin, Institute of International Education 31/1: 12–14, 44.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. and Bonilla, F. 1955Evaluating Exchange of Persons Programs.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 21/1: 2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wipand, H. 1980 International Education Programs of the U.S. Government, An Inventory. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. 1980 The Fulbright Program in the Eighties: Summary of Conference. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar