Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:55:59.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marginalization and the International Division of Labor: Mozambique's Strategy of Opening the Market*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

James H. Mittelman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mozambique is a country that lends itself to metaphor—of high ideals, of challenge to the world system, and of unfulfilled aspirations. There, questions that elsewhere are raised in academic forums are articulated as matters of public policy: searching questions about the structures that perpetuate international inequality, the ability of a mass movement to erode the basis of worldwide domination, and aspirations for democracy amid pervasive poverty. In an extreme form, to be sure, Mozambique has gone the way of the continent—from lofty expectations to an increasingly marginal position in the international division of labor. This article is an attempt to discern the dynamics of marginalization in the world system. Informed by theoretical debates over the emerging international division of labor, this is an effort to rethink, and draw lessons from, one concrete historical experience: the global constraints and opportunities facing Mozambique.

Stated briefly, the core argument is that the concept of the international division of labor must be stretched to account fully for the regionalization of problems and solutions. While internationalization entails increasing integration into expanding financial markets and penetration by transnational corporations, Africa has not kept pace with the global manufacturing system and the related upsurge of export activities. Although industrialization is not a magic remedy for the problems of underdevelopment, upgrading the role of manufacturing is a key component of productive economic growth. However, efforts to promote manufacturing are constrained by market-based reforms insofar as they are anti-egalitarian and erode the basis of democracy at the very time when forces at home and abroad are pushing for democratization.

Type
Articles
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , December 1991 , pp. 89 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article is a substantially revised version of a paper presented to the Dalhousie University Workshop on Canadian Policy in Southern Africa and the Future of Angola and Namibia, held in Halifax, Nova Scotia, March 23-24, 1990.

References

Amsden, Alice. 1989 Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni and Drangel, Jessica. 1986 “The Stratification of the World-Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipheral Zone.” Review 10/1 (Summer): 9–74.Google Scholar
Bluestone, Barry and Harrison, Bennett. 1982 The Deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). 1989 Mozambique Country Report. Quebec: CIDA Briefing Centre.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James, ed. 1987 A Changing International Division of Labor. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
“Chissano Says Stop.” 1989 The Economist (London) 311/7607 (17 June): 45.Google Scholar
Cohen, Robin. 1987 The New Helots: Migrants in the International Division of Labour. Brookfield: Gower.Google Scholar
Davies, Robert. 1989 “The SADF's Covert War against Mozambique.” In Society at War: The Militarisation of South Africa, edited by Jacklyn, Cock and Laurie, Nathan, 103–15. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Deyo, Frederic C, ed. 1987 The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 1989 Tanzania/Mozambique: Country Report No. 1 1989. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar
Egerö, Bertil. 1987 Mozambique: A Dream Undone: The Political Economy of Democracy, 1975-84. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
Fröbel, Folker, Heinrichs, Jurgen, and Kreye, Otto. 1980 The New International Division of Labor: Structural Unemployment in Industrialised Countries and Industrialisation in Developing Countries. Translated by Pete Burgess, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gereffi, Gary. 1989 “Rethinking Development Theory: Insights from East Asia and Latin America.” Sociological Forum 4/4 (December): 505–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersony, Robert. 1988 “Summary of Mozambican Refugee Accounts of Principally Conflict-Related Experience in Mozambique.” Report Submitted to Bureau for Refugee Programs, U.S. Department of State. Washington, DC: mimeo.Google Scholar
Government of Mozambique, National Executive Commission for the Emergency, and Department for the Prevention and Combat of Natural Disasters. 1988 Rising to the Challenge: Dealing with the Emergency in Mozambique. Maputo: Government Printer. Cited by Prakish Ratllal. 1988. “Mozambique—Overview of the Economy in the Last Ten Years.” Maputo: mimeo.Google Scholar
Government of Mozambique, National Planning Commission. 1984 Economic Report. Maputo: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Government of Mozambique and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. 1988 Mozambique: Policy Framework Paper, 1988 to 1990. Washington, DC: IBRD.Google Scholar
Gumende, Antonio. 1989 “Maputo Gets New Signals.” Southern African Economist (Harare) 2/3: 14, 15.Google Scholar
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD or World Bank). 1989a World Development Report 1989. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD or World Bank). 1989b Trends in Developing Economies 1989. Washington, DC: IBRD.Google Scholar
Interview with Prime Minister Mario Machungo. 1988 “Whys and Hows of Economic Reform.” Southern African Economist 1/4 (August-September): 25–27.Google Scholar
Lipietz, Alain. 1987 Mirages and Miracles: The Crises of Global Fordism. Translated by David Macey, . London: Verso.Google Scholar
MacEwan, Arthur and Tabb, William|K., eds. 1989 Instability and Change in the World Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Maureen. 1986 “Economic Policy Context and Adjustment Options in Mozambique.” Development and Change 17/3 (July): 557–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Judith. 1989 “On the Ropes: Socialism and FRELIMO's Fifth Congress.” Southern Africa Report (Toronto) 5/2 (November): 34.Google Scholar
Minter, William. 1989 “The Mozambican National Resistance (Renamo) as Described by Exparticipants.” Report Submitted to the Ford Foundation and the Swedish International Development Agency. Washington, DC: mimeo.Google Scholar
Mittelman, James H. 1981 Underdevelopment and the Transition to Socialism: Mozambique and Tanzania. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mittelman, James H. 1988 Out from Underdevelopment: Prospects for the Third World. London: Macmillan, and New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, June and Fernández-Kelly, , Maria, Patricia, eds. 1983 Women, Men, and the New International Division of Labor. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Obsanjo, Olusegon. 1988 Southern Africa: The Security of the Front-Line States. Report of the Security Mission to the Front-Line States. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1988 The Newly Industrialising Countries: Challenge and Opportunity for OECD Industries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1989a Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1989b Financing of External Debt of Developing Countries: 1988 Survey. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Roesch, Otto. 1989 “Nampula: What's Left?” Southern Africa Report 5/2 (November): 9–13.Google Scholar
Sanderson, , Steven, E., ed. 1985 The Americas in the New International Division of Labor. New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1988 The Mobility of Labor and Capital: A Study in International Investment and Labor Flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, John S. 1985 “Socialist Transition and External Intervention: Mozambique and South Africa's War.” Labour, Capital and Society 18/1 (April): 153–70.Google Scholar
“Siege Survival Tactics.” 1987 South 79 (May): 27, 28.Google Scholar
Southern Africa Online (Harare). 1989 2/25 (7 July): 1–9.Google Scholar
United Nations Children's Fund. 1990 “Country Programme Recommendation: Mozambique.” E/ICEF/1990/P/L.6.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce. 1989 Foreign Economic Trends and Their Implications for the United States. FET 89–51. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1990 “Mozambique,” Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1989, Report to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: Government Printer.Google Scholar