Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T09:55:47.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting Close to Rwandans since the Genocide: Studying Everyday Life in Highly Politicized Research Settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2013

Susan Thomson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Research with people in highly politicized research settings illuminates the gap between the images that most African governments strive to represent and the sociopolitical realities of everyday life. This article discusses the opportunities and challenges of doing research in postgenocide Rwanda and is a useful resource for researchers contemplating their own projects under such conditions, whether in Rwanda or elsewhere. It discusses the importance of creating personal relationships and meeting people on their terms, as well as such topics as the identification of the research site, building rapport and trust with respondents, safeguarding anonymity and confidentiality, and working with local research assistants and partners.

Résumé:

Résumé:

La recherche menée avec des collègues dans des milieux de recherche hautement politisés met en lumière l'écart entre l'image que la plupart des gouvemements africains veulent se donner et les réalités socio-économiques de la vie courante. L'article examine les opportunités et les difficultés liées à la recherche menée au Rwanda à la suite du génocide, et se veut une source première utile pour les chercheurs contemplant leurs propres prqjets dans de telles conditions, que ce soit au Rwanda on ailleurs. L'article contemple l'importance de créer des liens personnels avec les sujets de la recherche; de travailler avec des partenaires et un assistant de recherche locaux; d'organiser des rencontres avec des gens ordinaires selon leurs propres termes, y compris le choix des sites de recherche, et l'établissement d'un rapport de confiance avec les personnes interrogées pour protéger l'anonymat et la confidentialité de ceux-ci.

Type
Research Article
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , December 2010 , pp. 19 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Codere, Helen. 1962. “Power in Ruanda.” Anthropologica 4: 45–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterill, Pam, and Letherby, Gayle. 1993. “Weaving Stories: Personal Auto/biographies in Feminist Research.” Sociology 27 (1): 67–80.Google Scholar
Crépeau, Pierre, and Bizimana, Simon. 1979. Proverbes du Rwanda. Tervuren: Musée royale de l'Afrique centrale.Google Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2009. Killing Neighbors: Webs of Violence in Rwanda. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ingelaere, Bert. 2010. “Do We Understand Life after Genocide? Center and Periphery in the Construction of Knowledge in Postgenocide Rwanda.” African Studies Review 53: 41–59.Google Scholar
King, Elisabeth. 2009. “From Data Problems to Data Points: Challenges and Opportunities of Research in Postgenocide Rwanda.” African Studies Review 52: 128–48.Google Scholar
Malkki, Lisa. 1995. Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory and National Cosmology among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, Carolyn. 1997. A Different Kind of War Story. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Pottier, Johan. 2002. Reimagining Rwanda: Conflict, Survival and Disinformation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Republic of Rwanda. Legal and Constitutional Commission. 2003. The Constitution of the Republic of Rwanda. Kigali: LCC.Google Scholar
Schensul, Stephen, Schensul, Jean, and LeCompte, Margaret. 1999. Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Intenriews, and Questionnaires. Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Skeggs, Beverley. 2002. “Techniques for Telling die Reflexive Self.” In Qualitative Research in Action, edited by May, Tim, 349–74. London: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
Sriram, Chandra Lekha, et al., eds. 2009. Surviving Research: Doing Fieldwork in Difficult and Violent Situations. London: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2009a. “Resisting Reconciliation: State Power and Everyday Life in Post-genocide Rwanda.” Ph.D. diss., Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2009b. “‘That Is Not What We Authorised You to Do …’: Access and Government Interference in Highly Politicised Research Environments.” In Surviving Research: Doing Fieldwork in Difficult and Violent Situations, edited by Sriram, Chandra Lekha et al., 108–23. London: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan. Forthcoming. “Re-education for Reconciliation: Participant Observations on Ingando .” In Remaking Rwanda: Slate Building and Human Rights after Mass Violence, edited by Straus, Scott and Waldorf, Lars, 480–92. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Elizabeth Jean. 2006. “The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones.” Qualitative Sociology 29: 373–86.Google Scholar