Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:08:34.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formalities of Poverty: Thinking about Social Assistance in Neoliberal South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2013

Abstract:

In Marginal Gains (2004), Jane Guyer traces the logic of African socioeconomic practices that have long confounded attempts by modern states to impose what she terms “formalization.” Nowhere is the tension between pragmatically “informal” economic life and putatively “formal” state structures more evident than in the domain of poverty interventions, which typically aim to bring state institutional power to bear precisely on those who are most excluded from the “formal sector.” This article offers a preliminary analysis of some new rationalities of poverty alleviation observable in recent South African political and policy discourse. I will argue that new sorts of programmatic thinking about poverty represent a new development within (and not simply against) neoliberalism, and that they seek, by abandoning the regulatory and normalizing functions usually associated with social assistance, to bring the formal and the informal into a new sort of relation.

Type
Special Issue
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barchiesi, Franco. 2006. “South African Debates on the Basic Income Grant: Decommodification and the Post-Apartheid Social Policy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug 11, 2006.Google Scholar
Barry, Andrew, Osborne, Thomas, and Rose, Nikolas, eds. 1996. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burger, Delien. 2006 South Africa Yearbook 2005/06. Government Communication and Information System. Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa.Google Scholar
Bond, Patrick. 2005. Elite Transition: From Apartheid to Neoliberalism in South Africa. 2nd edition. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, Keith. 2005. “The Biometrie State: The Promise and Peril of Digital Government in the New South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 31 (2): 267–82.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, Barbara. 1999. The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Soto, Hernando. 2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Ehe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Department of Social Development. 2002. “Transforming the Present-Protecting the Future: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into a Comprehensive System of Social Security for South Africa.” Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1984 [1966]. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elyachar, Julia. Markets of Dispossession: NGOs, Economic Development, and the State in Cairo. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Ben. 2000. Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millenium. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guyer, Jane I. 2004. Marginal Gains: Monetary Transactions in Atlantic Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Karen Tranberg, and Vaa, Mariken. 2004. Reconsidering Informality: Perspectives from Urban Africa. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
IRIN (IRINnews.org). 2006. IRAQ: Food Prices Rise after Reduction of Monthly Rations. New York: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, April 2.Google Scholar
Koolhaas, Rem, et al. 2000. Mutations. Barcelona: ACTAR.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1945. The Dynamics of Culture Change: An Inquiry into Race Relations in Africa. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mattisonn, Heidi, and Seekings, Jeremy. 2003. The Politics of a Basic Income Grant in South Africa, 1996–2002. In Guy Standing and Samson, Michael, eds., A Basic Income Grant for South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timmothy. 1988. Colonizing Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Møller, Valerie, and Ferreira, Monica. 2003. “Getting By… Benefits of Non-contributory Pension Income for Older South African Households.” Grahamstown and Cape Town: University of Cape Town Institute of Ageing in Africa. Non-contributory Pensions and Poverty Study, http://idpm.man.ac.uk/ncpps.Google Scholar
Oversold: The World Bank Changes Its Tune on Latin America's Privatized Pensions.” 2004. The Economist, September 23.Google Scholar
Platzky, Laurine, and Walker, Cherryl. 1985. The Surplus People: Forced Removals in South Africa. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political andEconomic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Republic of South Africa. 2005. Labour Force Survey, September 2005. Statistics South Africa. Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sagner, Andreas. 2000. “Ageing and Social Policy in South Africa: Historical Perspectives with Particular Reference to the Easter Cape.” Journal of Southern African Studies 26 (3): 523–33.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Seekings, Jeremy, and Nattrass, Nicoli. 2005. Class, Race, and Inequality in South Africa. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing, Guy, and Samson, Michael, eds. 2003. A Basic Income Grant for South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
Terreblanche, Sampie. 2003. History of Inequality in South Africa 1652–2002. Durban: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
Tilton, Doug. 2005. BIG Fact Sheet #1. Capetown: BIG Coalition. www.big.org.za/index.php?option=ardcles&task=viewarticle&artid=5.Google Scholar
van der Waal, Kees, and Sharp, John. 1988. “The Informal Sector: A New Resource.” In Boonzaier, Emile and Sharp, John, eds., South African Keywords: The Uses and Abuses of Political Concepts. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar