Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:52:46.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Experiences. Opinions, and Attitudes of Yoruba Repatriates of the Former Eastern (Iboland) Region Aspects of the Pre-Crisis Interethnic Contacts and Relations in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

J. A. Sofola*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Extract

One important element in the definition and understanding of the dynamics of interethnic or intergroup relations generally is the attitude which prevails among the particular ethnic groups who are in a contact situation. Attitude formation is a function of the experiences acquired and the opinions formed by the parties to the social contact. For the latter two by their nature are a necessary precondition of the former. Put another way, experience in a social situation and the judgement arrived at as being true and derivable from that experience either intellectually or otherwise (for this essentially is what constitutes opinion) must take place before attitude occurs. Attitude essentially is an acquired, or learned, and established tendency of an individual to react toward or against something or somebody. It does not, we must warn, refer to any one specific act or response of an individual, but is an abstraction from a large number of consistent, related acts or responses of the person to an object or people (Green 1954, p. 336).

An attitude may be characteristic of a person (and as such relate to the given person) or to other persons or to social groups or to society. It may even be social in the sense that is characteristic of a homogeneous group of persons. The place of attitude in intergroup dynamics cannot be overemphasised. For it determines whether or not group members accept one another and a condition of harmony, integration, intergroup wholesome or unwholesome competition or rivalry exist among them. It also determines whether a condition of stability or instability obtains in the overall society in which the contacting groups are active participants in the socioeconomic lives. A group characterised by favourable attitudes toward another group would most probably accept the members of that group. And if acceptance is achieved, an important milestone is reached in the harmonious relations between the groups and in a condition of stability characterised by a minimum of antagonism. And man, it is said, functions fully, effectively under a condition of stability when his potentials are maximised and are fully released or expressed and utilised because of the existing security.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Akinyede, Chief. “The Emergence of Two Military Rulers in the Western State Is the Finest Thing That Has Ever Happened to the Ekitis.” Daily Times (October 22, 1969), p. 8.Google Scholar
Benedek, T.Personality Development.” In Alexander, F. and Ross, H., eds. Dynamic Psychiatry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Green, Bert E.Attitude Measurement.” In Lindsey, G., ed. Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 1. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1954.Google Scholar
Seibel, H. Dieter. “Some Aspects of Inter-Ethnic Relations in Nigeria: The Experiences of the Ibos Among the Yorubas.” Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. IX, No. 2 (July 1967).Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Class, Status, Party.” In Bendix, Reinhard and Lipset, Martin, eds. Class, Status and Power. Chicago: Free Press of Glencoe, 1953.Google Scholar