Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:29:12.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grand Designs: Assessing the African Energy Security Implications of the Grand Inga Dam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2015

Nathaniel Green ,
Benjamin K. Sovacool  and
Kathleen Hancock
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In May 2013 the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) announced that construction of the world’s largest hydroelectric project will begin in October 2015. Upon completion, according to the DRC, the project will bring electricity to half the African continent. With funding from South Africa, the World Bank, the African Development Bank, and others, the U.S.$80 billion Grand Inga Hydroelectric project will construct a 44,000 megawatt (MW) dam anchored to a new transmission network able to distribute electricity to all four of sub-Saharan Africa’s regional electricity power pools. While the dam promises to bring electricity to many millions of Africans who currently lack access, the project also poses risks to the citizens and environment of the DRC. To assess the complex tradeoffs, this article evaluates four dimensions that are part of an energy security framework: availability, affordability, efficiency, and stewardship. In doing so, it explores some of the governance challenges that arise in managing such a “mega-project.” The analysis also reveals tensions between national and regional energy security. It presents evidence that, under certain assumptions, the pursuit of enhanced security at the regional level may result in a net security loss for the DRC. Finally, the article provides suggestions for enhancing the decision-making process of those designing related national and regional energy strategies.

Résumé:

En mai 2013, la République démocratique du Congo (RDC) a annoncé que la construction du plus grand projet hydroélectrique du monde débutera en octobre 2015. Une fois terminé, selon la RDC, le projet apportera de l'électricité à la moitié du continent africain. Grâce au financement de l'Afrique du Sud, la Banque mondiale, la Banque africaine de développement et d'autres, le projet hydroélectrique du Grand Inga, évalué à 80 milliards de dollars, construira un barrage qui produira 44000 mégawatts (MW) et qui sera ancré à un nouveau réseau en mesure de distribuer de l'électricité aux quatre pôles régionaux électriques de l'Afrique subsaharienne. Bien que le barrage promette d'apporter de l'électricité à des millions d'Africains qui n’y ont pas actuellement accès, le projet pose aussi des risques pour les citoyens de la RDC et pour l’environnement. Pour évaluer les compromis complexes en jeu, nous analysons quatre dimensions du projet qui font partie du cadre de la sécurité énergétique: disponibilité, accessibilité, efficacité, et intendance. Ce faisant, nous explorons aussi quelques uns des défis de gouvernance qui se posent dans la gestion d’un tel “méga projet.” Notre analyse révèle également des tensions entre la sécurité énergétique nationale et régionale. Nous constatons que, sous certaines hypothèses, la poursuite de l’amélioration de la sécurité énergétique au niveau régional pourrait aboutir à une perte nette de sécurité au niveau national pour la RDC. En conclusion, l’article offre des suggestions à prendre en compte dans le processus de prise de décision de ceux qui conçoivent les stratégies énergétiques connexes au niveau national et régional.

Keywords

Hydroelectricityenergy and developmentenergy securityDemocratic Republic of Congo
Type
ARTICLES
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 133 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W. M., and Hughes, F. M. R.. 1986. “The Environmental Effects of Dam Construction in Tropical Africa: Impacts and Planning Procedures.” Geoforum 17 (3–4): 403–10.Google Scholar
Ansar, Atif, et al. 2014. “Should We Build More Large Dams? The Actual Costs of Hydropower Megaproject Development.” Energy Policy 69: 43–56.Google Scholar
Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). 2007. A Quest for Energy Security in the 21st Century: Resources and Constraints. Tokyo: APERC.Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank. 2007. Energy for All: Addressing the Energy, Environment, and Poverty Nexus in Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Bazilian, M. Nussbaumer, et al. 2012. “Energy Access Scenarios to 2030 for the Power Sector in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Utilities Policy 20 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
BBC World News. 2012. “DR Congo Inga Three Dam: BHP Billiton Withdraws Custom.” February 16.Google Scholar
Biswas, Asit. 2008. “Compensation and Benefit Sharing: Why Resettlement Policies and Practices Must Be Reformed.” Water Science and Engineering 1: 89–120.Google Scholar
Biswas, Asit. 2012. “Impacts of Large Dams: Opportunities and Constraints.” In Impacts of Large Dams: A Global Assessment, edited by Tortajada, Cecilia, Biswas, Asit K., and Altinbilek, Dogan, 1–18. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Brismar, Anna. 2004. “Attention to Impact Pathways in EISs of Large Dam Projects.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24: 59–87.Google Scholar
Brown, M. A., and Sovacool, B. K.. 2011. Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cernea, Michael M. 1997. “Hydropower Dams and Social Impacts: A Sociological Perspective.” Social Assessment Series.Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Cable News Network (CNN). 2013. “Fate of U.S. Hostages in Algeria.” January 18.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul. 2008. The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, C., and Mukend, A.. 1994. “Involuntary Resettlement in Bank-Financed Projects: Lessons from Experience in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Involuntary Resettlement in Africa, edited by Cook, C., 33–47. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Davis, T. C. 2007–8. “Breaking Ground Without Lifting a Shovel: Ecuador’s Plan to Leave Its Oil in the Ground.” Houston Journal of International Law 30: 243–45.Google Scholar
Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). 2013. Inga Project Press Release. May 18. www.inga-hsavirtualpressroom.com.Google Scholar
Dubash, Navroz K., et al. 2001. A Watershed in Global Governance? An Independent Assesssment of the World Commission on Dams. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2013. “Business in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Murky Minerals.” May 18.Google Scholar
Fall, Latsoucabe. 2010. “Harnessing the Hydropower Potential in Africa: What Should Be the Place and Role of Grand Inga Hydropower Project?” Paper presented at 21st World Energy Congress, Montreal, Canada. www.worldenergy.org.Google Scholar
Fujikura, Ryo, Nakayama, Mikiyasu, and Takesada, Naruhiko. 2009. “Lessons from Resettlement Caused by Large Dam Projects: Case Studies from Japan, Indonesia and Sri Lanka.” International Journal of Water Resources Development 25 (3): 407–18.Google Scholar
Gaylord, S., and Hancock, K. J.. 2013. “Developing World: National Energy Strategies.” In The International Handbook of Energy Security, edited by Dyer, Hugh and Julia Trombetta, Maria, 206–38. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M., Sachs, J. D. and Stiglitz, J. E., eds. 2007. Escaping the Resource Curse. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2011. “Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation.” Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
International Consortium for Africa (ICA). 2008. “Power Supply Situation for Africa.” Background paper prepared for the ICA Annual Meeting, March 13–14.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2012. World Energy Outlook 2012. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2013. Global Status of Modern Energy Access. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation (IFC). 2011. “Lighting Africa.” Policy Report Note. Washington, D.C.: IFC.Google Scholar
International Rivers Network (IRN). 2011. Congo’s Energy Divide: Hydropower for Mines and Export, Not the Poor. www.internationalrivers.org.Google Scholar
International Rivers Network (IRN). “Grand Inga Dam: DR Congo” 2014. www.internationalrivers.org.Google Scholar
Jullien, Maud. 2013. “Can DR Congo’s Inga Dam Project Power Africa?” BBC World News Africa, November 14.Google Scholar
Karl, T. L. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Michael J. 2013. “U.S. Considers Funding Part of Congo’s $12 Billion Inga Dam.” Washington Post, December 16.Google Scholar
Kemenes, Alexandre, Forsberg, Bruce R., and Melack, John M.. 2011. “CO2 Emissions from a Tropical Hydroelectric Reservoir (Balbina, Brazil).” Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 116 (G3).Google Scholar
Klare, Michael T. 2007. “The Futile Pursuit of Energy Security by Military Force.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 13 (2):139–53.Google Scholar
Knox-Hayes, J., et al. 2013. “Understanding Attitudes toward Energy Security: Results of a Cross-National Survey.” Global Environmental Change 23 (3): 609–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacher, W., and Kumetat, D.. 2011. “The Security of Energy Infrastructure and Supply in North Africa: Hydrocarbons and Renewable Energies in Comparative Perspective.” Energy Policy 39 (8): 4466–78.Google Scholar
Lange, S. 2011. “Gold and Governance: Legal Injustices and Lost Opportunities in Tanzania.” African Affairs 110 (439): 233–52.Google Scholar
Larrea, C., and Warnars, L.. 2009. “Ecuador’s Yasuní-ITT Initiative: Avoiding Emissions by Keeping Petroleum Underground.” Energy for Sustainable Development 13: 219–23.Google Scholar
Le Billon, P. 2004. “Geopolitical Economy of Resource Wars.” Geopolitics 9 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Lederman, D., and Maloney, William F.. 2007. Natural Resources: Neither Curse Nor Destiny. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lerer, Leonard B., and Scudder, Thayer. 1999. “Health Impacts of Large Dams.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19 (2): 113–23.Google Scholar
Luft, Gal, and Korin, Anne, ed. 2009. Energy Security Challenges for the 21st Century: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praegar.Google Scholar
Luong, Pauline Jones, and Weinthal, Erika. 2010. Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manyari, Waleska Valença, and Carvalho, Osmar Abilio de Jr. 2007. “Environmental Considerations in Energy Planning for the Amazon Region: Downstream Effects of Dams.” Energy Policy 35 (12): 6526–34.Google Scholar
Mining Journal. 2012. “DRC: Tackling the Issues.” August 17. www.nortonrosefulbright.com.Google Scholar
Ministre des Ressources Hydrauliques et Electricité (DRC). 2013. “Grand Inga Aménagement hydroélectrique en RDC.”Google Scholar
Naidoo, P. 2009. “New Strategies for Harvesting Large-Scale Bulk Energy from the Congo River without a Conventional Dam.” Paper presented at meeting of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Power and Energy Society (IEEE PES), Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
Nossiter, Adam, and Sayare, Scott. 2013. “Militants Seize Americans and Other Hostages in Algeria.” New York Times, January 16.Google Scholar
Panzu, Vika di. 2013. “Grand Inga Feasibility Study–Hydro 2013.” Addis Ababa: Democratic Republic of Congo, Societe Nationale d’Electricite.Google Scholar
Pegg, S. 2006. “Can Policy Intervention Beat the Resource Curse? Evidence from the Chad–Cameroon Pipeline Project.” African Affairs 105 (418): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosnes, Orvikaand, and Vennemo, Haakon. 2012. “The Cost of Providing Electricity to Africa.” Energy Economics 34 (5): 1318–28.Google Scholar
Ross, M. L. 2012. The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, S. Baidya, Walsh, P. D., and Lichstein, J. W.. 2005. “Can Logging in Equatorial Africa Affect Adjacent Parks?” Ecology and Society 10 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Southern African Development Community (SADC). 2013. “Infrastructure and Services Workshop.” April 11. www.sadc.int.Google Scholar
Sawin, J. L., et al. 2012. “Renewables 2012: Global Status Report.” Paris: REN21 Secretariat.Google Scholar
Scudder, Thayer. 2006. The Future of Large Dams: Dealing with Social, Environmental, Institutional and Political Costs. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scudder, Thayer, and Gay, John. 2006. “A Comparative Survey of Dam-Induced Resettlement in 50 Cases.” In The Future of Large Dams: Dealing with Social, Environmental. Institutional and Political Costs, edited by Scudder, Thayer, 56–86. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Sebitosi, A. B. 2008. “Energy Efficiency, Security of Supply and the Environment in South Africa: Moving beyond the Strategy Documents.” Energy 33 (11): 1591–96.Google Scholar
Sebitosi, A. B., and Okou, R.. 2010. “Re-thinking the Power Transmission Model for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy 38 (3): 1448–54.Google Scholar
Shih, Toh Han. 2014. “US Mulling Partnership with China in Congo Inga 3 Dam Project.” South China Morning Post, January 20.Google Scholar
Showers, Kate B. 2009. “Congo River’s Grand Inga Hydroelectricity Scheme: Linking Environmental History, Policy and Impact.”Water History 1 (1): 31–58.Google Scholar
Showers, Kate B. 2011. “Beyond Mega on a Mega Continent: Grand Inga on Central Africa’s Congo River.” In Engineering the Earth: The Impacts of Megaengineering Projects, edited by Brunn, Stanley D., 1651–79. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Southern African Development Community (SADC). 2012. “Regional Infrastructure Development Master Plan (RIDMP) Executive Summary.” www.sadc.int.Google Scholar
Southern African Power Pool (SAPP). 2014. “SAPP Statistics 2014.”http://www.sapp.co.zw.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K. 2010. “The Political Economy of Oil and Gas in Southeast Asia: Heading Towards the Natural Resource Curse?” Pacific Review 23 (2): 225–59.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K. 2013. “An International Assessment of Energy Security Performance.” Ecological Economics 88: 148–58.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., and Mukherjee, I.. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Energy Security: A Synthesized Approach.” Energy 36 (8): 5343–55.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., and Bulan, L. C.. 2011. “Behind an Ambitious Megaproject in Asia: The History and Implications of the Bakun Hydroelectric Dam in Borneo.” Energy Policy 39 (9): 4842–59.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., and Cooper, C. J.. 2013. The Governance of Energy Megaprojects: Politics, Hubris, and Energy Security. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., Nugent, D., and Gilbert, A.. 2014. “Construction Cost Overruns and Electricity Infrastructure: An Unavoidable Risk?” Electricity Journal 47 (4): 112–20.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., et al. 2011. “Evaluating Energy Security Performance from 1990 to 2010 for Eighteen Countries.” Energy 36 (10): 5846–53.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K. 2012. “Exploring Propositions about Perceptions of Energy Security: An International Survey.” Environmental Science and Policy 16 (1): 44–64.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., ed. 2011. The Routledge Handbook of Energy Security. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
St-Pierre, Stephane. 2013. “Grand Inga Feasibility Study.” AECOM-RSW International, EDF.Google Scholar
Steinhurst, William, Knight, Patrick, and Schultz, Melissa. 2012. “Hydropower Greenhouse Gas Emissions: State of the Research.” Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. http://www.cusli.org.Google Scholar
Tilt, Bryan, Braun, Yvonne, and He, Daming. 2009. “Social Impacts of Large Dam Projects: A Comparison of International Case Studies and Implications for Best Practice.” Journal of Environmental Management 90 (Supplement 3): S249–57.Google Scholar
Titeca, K., and de Herdt, T.. 2011. “Real Governance behind the ‘Failed State’: Negotiating Education in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.” African Affairs 110 (439): 213–31.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2013. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. Human Development Report 2013. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme, Asia-Pacific Regional Centre (UNDP APRC) 2013. Achieving Sustainable Energy for All in the Asia-Pacific. Bangkok: UNDP APRC.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. G., et al. 2012. “Environmental Impact Post-Assessment of Dam and Reservoir Projects: A Review.” Procedia Environmental Sciences 13: 1439–43.Google Scholar
Wang, Pu, et al. 2013. “A Framework for Social Impact Analysis of Large Dams: A Case Study of Cascading Dams on the Upper-Mekong River, China.” Journal of Environmental Management 117 (15): 131–40.Google Scholar
Welsch, M., et al. 2013. “Smart and Just Grids for Sub-Saharan Africa: Exploring Options.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 20 (April): 336–52.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, Brooke, Webber, Michael, and Duan, Yuefang. 2011. “Development for Whom? Rural to Urban Resettlement at the Three Gorges Dam, China.” Asian Studies Review 35 (1): 21–42.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1996. “Resettlement and Development.” The Bankwide Review of Projects Involving Involuntary Resettlement, 1986–1993. Paper No. 032, Environment Department Papers. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. “Eskom Power Investment Support Project Fact Sheet.”Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2013. “Worldwide Governance Indicators.”Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Commission on Dams. 2000. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
World Energy Council (WEC). 2010. “Information on the Inga Projects.”www.worldenergy.org.Google Scholar
Xu, Chester Lynne. 2010. “Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit Its Polysemic Nature.” Energy Policy 38: 887–95.Google Scholar
Yamba, Francis Davison, et al. 2011. “Climate Change/Variability Implications on Hydroelectricity Generation in the Zambezi River Basin.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 16 (6): 617–28.Google Scholar
Yergin, D. 2006. “Ensuring Energy Security.” Foreign Affairs 85 (2): 69–82.Google Scholar
Yukhananov, Anna. 2014. “World Bank Approves Funds to Study Congo’s Inga Dam.” Reuters, March 20.www.reuters.com.Google Scholar