Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:47:07.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concessions Scramble and Land Alienation in British Southern Ghana, 1885-19151

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Charles U. Ilegbune
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A curious state of uncertainty existed, still exists, and may never be wholly removed, as to the extent of land alienated by the chiefs of the Gold Coast during the concessions scramble which occurred during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The degree of uncertainty is at once brought out by the following two views on the matter. On the one hand, it is said (Belfield's Report, 1912: paras. 38-50) that the area of land alienated was only a fractional proportion of the total area of the Gold Coast, amounting to no more than one twenty-seventh of the area. On the other hand, it is said (WALC Draft Report, 1916: paras. 157 and 161) that the chiefs of the Gold Coast alienated an area which actually exceeded the total area of the territory itself. The objects of this article are three: first, to describe the nature and character of the concessions scramble which occurred in the Gold Coast during the period under consideration; secondly, to examine critically the opposing views as to the extent of land alienated and show where the truth is likely to be; and thirdly, to describe the interesting social and economic problems which resulted from indiscriminate alienation of land in the Gold Coast during the period, and the reaction of British officials to such problems.

During the second half of the nineteenth century, the Gold Coast received great publicity in Europe as a great producer of gold. Prospectors and concession hunters flocked to the area. They entered negotiations with the chiefs and elders, who were induced by offers of “big money” to execute documents granting mining and other rights over vast territories of stool land, in which all the stool subjects had an interest.

Type
Research Article
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , December 1976 , pp. 17 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

This article is based on material embodied in the writer's thesis entitled “British Concessions Policy and Legislation in Southern Ghana, 1874-1915,” which was presented to, and was accepted by, the University of London for the Ph.D. degree in June 1974.

References

REFERENCES

Allott, A.N. (1954) “Akan Law of Property.” Ph.D. thesis: University of London.Google Scholar
Belfield, H.C. (1912) Report on the Legislation Governing the Alienation of Native Lands in the Gold Coast and Ashanti, Cd. 6278. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (hereafter HMSO).Google Scholar
British Parliament. (1911) Correspondence Relating to the Alienation of Tribal Lands, Cd. 5743. LONDON: HMSO.Google Scholar
Buell, R.L. (1928) The Native Problem in Africa. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Busia, K.A. (1951) The Position of the Chief in the Modern Political System of Ashanti. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ashanta Company Limited v. Sekondi Literage and Hotel Company Limited (1906). Unreported judgment of Justice Pennington, 30 April 1906. Sekondi Civil Records, Accra: Ghana National Archives.Google Scholar
Asamangkese Akim Abuakwa Arbitration (1929). Reported and published in Selected Judgments of the Divisional Court of the Gold Coast from 1926 to 1929, p. 20 (usually cited as D. Ct. '26-'29, 220). Accra: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Atta v. Effrim (1905). Unreported judgment of Justice Purcell, 18 September. Accra Civil Records, Accra: Ghana National Archives.Google Scholar
Concession Inquiry Nos. 446 (Axim) and 800 (Cape Coast) (1905). Reported and published in Renner's Reports and Notes of Cases, 1861-1914, p. 271 (usually cited as Ren.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaibu v. Ntah (1912). Unreported judgment of Justice Watson, 24 October. Accra Civil Records, Accra: Ghana National Archives.Google Scholar
Kufuor v. Taibill (1909). Ren., p. 230.Google Scholar
Quarm v. Yankah (1930). Reported and published in Selected Judgments of the West African Court of Appeal, vol. 1, p. 80 (usually cited as W.A.C.A.). Lagos: Federal Government Printer.Google Scholar
Tamaklae v. Basel Trading Company Limited (1940). W.A.C.A., p. 231.Google Scholar
Wassaw Exploring Syndicate Limited v. African Rubber Company Limited (1914). Reported and published in Privy Council Judgments, 1874 to 1928, p. 22 (usually cited as P.C. '74-'28, 22). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Crowther, F. (1914) “Report of the Commissioner appointed to Inquire into Native Affairs in the Wassaw Divisions, 9 January 1914.” Enclosure 1 in confidential dispatch from Hugh Clifford to L. Harcourt, 13 January 1914: CO/96/527. London: Public Record Office (hereafter PRO). Also enclosure 1 in WALC “Correspondence and Papers,” no. 38, p. 115; PRO.Google Scholar
Danquah, J.B. (1928) Akan Laws and Customs and the Akim Abuakwa Constitution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dickson, K.B. (1969) A Historical Geography of Ghana. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gold Coast Government. (1914) “Executive Council Papers,” 17 March 1914. Ghana National Archives.Google Scholar
Gold Coast Government. (1894–1900) Government Gazette; Government Gazette (Extraordinary), CO/99/9 & 11. London: PRO.Google Scholar
SirGriffith, W.B., (1910) “Memorandum on Complaints as to Treatment of Natives under the Concessions Ordinance, 22 November 1910.” Unpublished; printed as no. 21 in African (West), no. 977. London: PRO.Google Scholar
SirGriffith, W.B., (1913) “Should the Concessions Ordinance be Repealed?” 25 June 1913; a memorandum; unpublished; printed in WALC “Minutes of Evidence,” p. 498. London: PRO.Google Scholar
Hailey, Lord William M. (1951) Native Administration in the British African Territories, part III. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hailey, Lord William M. (1957) An African Survey. Revised edition. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvers, C.R. (1945) sole commissioner. Report of Commission of Inquiry into Expenses incurred by Litigants in the Courts of the Gold Coast and the Indebtedness caused thereby. Accra: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Hill, Polly. (1963) The Migrant Cocoa Farmer of Southern Ghana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilton, T.E. (1960) Ghana Population Atlas. London: Nelson and Sons Limited.Google Scholar
Ilegbune, C.U. (1974) “British Concessions Policy and Legislation in Southern Ghana, 1874-1915.” Ph.D. thesis: University of London.Google Scholar
Kinmble, D. (1963). A Political History of Ghana. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lees, E.F.W. (1913) “Memorandum on the Application of the Concessions Ordinances in the Gold Coast and Ashanti, 10 April 1913.” Printed and enclosed in dispatch no. 2 in CO/96/530. London: PRO.Google Scholar
Lugard, F.D. (1922) The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa. London: W. Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Morel, E.D. (1916) “Memorandum on the Occupation and Usage of Land by Native Communities in West Africa.” Printed in WALC “Draft Report,” appendix D, p. 156. London: PRO.Google Scholar
Rattray, R.S. (1929) Ashanti Law and Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West African Lands Committee (WALC). (1912–1914) “Correspondence and Papers.” Printed as African (West) no. 1048. London: PRO.Google Scholar
West African Lands Committee (WALC). (1912–1914b) “Minutes of Evidence.” Printed as African (West) no. 1047. London: PRO.Google Scholar
West African Lands Committee (WALC). (1916) “Draft Report.” Printed as African (West) no. 1046. London: PRO.Google Scholar