Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:18:03.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selected Arguments Against United States' Economic Disengagement from South Africa and some Alternative Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2019

Extract

There is very wide agreement, with which I fully concur, regarding the abhorrent and unacceptable character of apartheid and regarding the inevitable demise of minority rule in South Africa. There is, however, honest disagreement regarding the best way for Americans and others to assist in effecting change. Differing motives for recommending disengagement may also sometimes confuse the issue. Disengagement can reflect such diverse policies as neutralism, non-cooperation, dissociation, intervention, or withdrawal. It can reflect a desire to induce change by positive steps or an acceptance that little can be done, but that the disengager will at least not be implicated or involved in a detested situation. To some it is the isolation of the disengager that is the goal; others appear to be propounding as-full-as-possible isolation of South Africa.

Type
Economic Relations Between South Africa and the United States
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1973 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* See United Nations Association of the United States of America, Southern Africa: Proposals for Americans, New York, December, 1971.

Hance, William A., ed., Southern Africa and the United States, New York, USA, Columbia University Press, 1968, p. 110.Google Scholar