No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Limits of Electoralism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2021
Extract
With the declaration of former military ruler, General Olusegun Obasanjo, as the president-elect, the long process of choosing Nigeria’s next civilian leadership finally brought to an end what had been a veritable “transition without end.” Although the elections have been successfully concluded, serious doubts remain concerning the survival and stability of the incoming civil order. It is one thing to hold elections, but establishing an enduring democratic order is a totally different and more challenging task.
On at least two grounds, the ongoing transition differed from earlier attempts. First, unlike General Ibrahim Babangida’s model of “guided transition”—in which the government formed the two political parties, wrote their manifestos, provided their funding, and appointed their officials—the current political parties were formed entirely by the political elite through the coalescence and structuring of the different political tendencies that survived General Sani Abacha’s reign of terror.
- Type
- Part 1
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © African Studies Association 1999
References
Notes
1. Toyo, Eskor, “The National Question in Nigeria,” The Guardian (Lagos), November 15, 1998 Google Scholar.
2. Niboro, Ina, “A Spanner in the Works,” Tell (Lagos) (August 17, 1998): 21 Google Scholar, and Akerele, Max Francis, “To Our Tents of Reconstruction,” The Guardian (Lagos) (January 27, 1999): 49 Google Scholar.
3. The Guardian, February 18, 1999, 7.
4. Interview, Africa Today (London) 4, no. 10 (October 1998): 13 Google Scholar.
5. Tell (Lagos) no. 39 (September 29, 1998): 7 and 16.
6. Obadina, Tunde, “Nigeria Unveils New Privatization Plan,” Africa Recovery 12, no. 3 (December 1998): 6–17 Google Scholar.
7. Joseph, Richard, “Africa, 1990-1997: From Abertura to Closure,” Journal of Democracy 9, no. 2 (April 1998): 3–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8. Ibid.