Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:20:42.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dichotomy of Politics and Corruption in a Neopatrimonial State: Evidence from Sierra Leone, 1968-1993

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

Gerald H. Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The scholarly studies on political corruption in Africa are not conclusive, given the lack of knowledge of how neopatrimonialism contributes to state corruption. This is an important omission. There are obvious relationships between regime types and the likelihood, nature, and extent of political corruption. The analysis of political corruption in Sierra Leone has important implications for our understanding of the relationship between neopatrimonialism and state corruption.

Type
Research Article
Information
African Issues , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 1997 , pp. 58 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Gerald H. Smith teaches Political Science and International Studies at Bowie State University, Maryland. He received his Doctoral degree in International Development at Howard University. He is co-author of the book, Political Behavior (University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, 1996).

References

Notes

1. Michael, Bratton and Walle, Nicholas Van De, “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa,” World Politics, vol. 46, no. 4 July, 1994 Google Scholar.

2. Gerald Caiden, “Dealing with Administrative Corruption,” Unpublished Paper, 1992.

3. Samuel, Eisenstadt, Traditional Patrimonialism and Modern Neopatrimonialism, London: Sage Publishing, 1992 Google Scholar.

4. Robert, Jackson and Carl, Rosberg, Personal Rule in Black Africa: Prince, Autocrat, Prophet, Tyrant. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982 Google Scholar.

5. Sahr, Kpundeh, “Corruption in Africa: Prospect in Contemporary Sierra Leone,” Corruption and Reform vol. 7, no. 3, 1993, 93 Google Scholar.

6. Luke, D. F. and Riley, S. P., “Economic Decline and the New Reform Agenda in Africa,” I.D.P.M. Discussion paper no. 28, University of Manchester, 1991 Google Scholar.

7. “The Politics of Economic Decline in Sierra Leone,” Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 27, no.1, 1989.

8. Lucien, Pye and Sidney, Verba, Political Culture and Political Development, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1966 Google Scholar.

9. Stephen Riley, “Reducing Administrative Corruption in Africa: Post-Independence Strategies on Limiting Administrative Corruption in the Democratizing of African States,” 1992.

10. Sierra Leone Government (GSL. 1994a). White Paper on the Report of the Justice Beccles-Davies Commission of Inquiry. Vol. 3, February, 1994 Google Scholar.

11. (GSL 1994b) White Paper on the Report of the Beccles-Davies Commission of Inquiry. Vol 4, March, 1994 Google Scholar.

12. (GSL 1993a) White Paper on the Report of Mrs. Justice Laura Marcus-Jones Commission of Inquiry. January, 1993.

13. (GSL 1993b) White Paper on the Report of the Justice Beccles-Davies Commission of Inquiry. Vol. 1, August, 1993 Google Scholar.

14 (GSL 1993c) White Paper on the Report of the Justice Beccles-Davies Commission of Inquiry. Vol. 2, October, 1993 Google Scholar.

15. A.B. Zack-Williams, “A Reflection on the Class Basis of Corruption in Sierra Leone and its Implication on Development,” Sierra Leone Studies at Birmingham, 1985.

16. See GSL 1993a.

17. See GSL 1993b.