Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:46:35.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conservative Africanists and African Studies: A Reply to Gann’s Reponse to Ralston

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Insight: Africanists and Conservatives
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Gann, L. H., “The State of Scholarship. African Studies: A Dissident’s View,” Academic Questions 2, 2, Spring 1989, p. 85 Google Scholar.

2. Particularly Gann, L. H. and Duignan, Peter, eds., Colonialism in Africa 1870-1960, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1969-75, 5 volumesGoogle Scholar; Gann, L.H. and Duignan, Peter, eds., African Proconsuls: European Governors of Africa, New York, Free Press, 1978 Google Scholar; and their jointly written The Ruhrs of German Africa 1870-1914, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1978; The Rulers of Belgian Africa, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1979; and The Rulers of British Africa, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1975.

3. For example, Gann, L.H., Neo-colonialism, Imperialist and the “New Class,” Menlo Park, California, Institute for Humane Studies, 1975 Google Scholar; Gann, L. H. and Duignan, Peter, South Africa: War, Revolution, or Peace?, Stanford, Hoover Institution Press, 1978 Google Scholar; Africa South of the Sahara: The Challenge to Western Security, Stanford, Hoover Institution Press, 1981; and Africa between East and West,> Cape Town, Tafelberg Publishers, 1983.