Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:46:13.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Black Studies, White Studies, and Afrocentrism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

Extract

It is with the continued advances in the discipline of African American (Black) Studies that this essay comes to life. Recent articles by Bunzel and Grossman take dubious aim at Black Studies, its instructors, and its organizing principles. Grossman is even so obtuse as to use Lefkowitz’s Not Out of Africa, a book with virtually no grounding in reality as it relates to African Studies, to help prove her misguided thoughts. The authors are not concerned with Black Studies so much as they are with the fear of losing the privileged position White studies maintains. They use their articles as a poor attempt to discredit or otherwise slander a discipline that they simply do not understand or even attempt to understand. Articles such as “Tales from the Black Studies Ghetto” and “Black Studies Revisited” are clear evidence of the fear and ignorance Eurocentric thinkers are gripped by when dealing with an Afrocentric paradigm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Paul T. Miller is an instructor in the Black Studies Department at San Francisco State University. His research interests concern culturally consistent education, theories of African personality, and traditional African philosophy as it relates to the 21st century

References

Notes

1. John H., Bunzel and Anita, Grossman, “Black Studies Revisited,” The Public Interest, Spring, vol. 127, 1997, 7180 Google Scholar.

2. Anita, Grossman, “Tales from the Black Studies Ghetto,” Heterodoxy, vol. 5, #2, 1997, 7-10Google Scholar.

3. Bunzel, 79.

4. See Ani’s Yurugu for a thorough discussion on this topic.

5. Bunzel, 79.

6. Ibid, 80.