Article contents
Group Conflict and Human Rights in the Horn of Africa
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2021
Extract
Africa’s receptiveness to Western fashionable concepts and theories appears to have suffered little from repeated demonstration of inappropriateness. The list of inapt imports is long and quite familiar to the older generation of Africanist academics who had a hand in fashioning and disseminating them. It began with the imperative of the “nation-state” that was to be forged in the process of national integration and institution building. Economic development was to come via industrialization, “import substitution” and diversification of exports, and social modernization would follow the passing of traditional society. Political development had a complex formula: “constitutionalism” and “rational legitimacy,” “interest articulation, aggregation and representation,” “functionally specific” bureaucratic institutions, and “prescriptive” as opposed to “ascriptive” recruitment.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © African Studies Association 1994
Footnotes
John Markakis is Professor of African Studies in the Department of History/Archaeology and the Program of Oriental and African Studies at the University of Crete, Greece.
References
Note
1. Burr, M., Quantifying Genocide in the Southern Sudan: 1983-1993, United States Committee for Refugees, 1993.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by