Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:17:00.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gorbachev’s ‘New Thinking’ and the Options for President Bush on Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2021

Donald Rothchild
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Upon taking office, a new administration has a unique opportunity to set its own goals and priorities. President Bush, although somewhat constrained by his links to the Reagan past as well as by his cold war (i.e., “globalist”) perceptions of the external world and by his self-imposed austerity measures, nonetheless retains a sometimes unrecognized room for maneuver. Taking into account the limitations in public economic resources that he faces, what policy options are open to his administration in its dealing with contemporary Africa?

Type
Focus: Issues in U.S. Policy Toward Africa, A New Administration in an Age of Transition
Information
African Issues , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Winter 1989 , pp. 10 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. For a fuller discussion, see Rothchild, Donald and Ravenhill, John, “Subordinating African Issues to Global Logic: Reagan Confronts Political Complexity,” in Oye, Kenneth A., Lieber, Robert J., and Rothchild, Donald (eds.), Eagle Resurgent? The Reagan Era in American Foreign Policy, Boston, Little, Brown, 1987, pp. 393–429 Google Scholar.

2. Legum, Colin, “United States: Why George Bush May Be Good News” Third World Reports, London, K.R/1 November 16, 1988, p. 1 Google Scholar.

3. New York Times, October 6, 1988, p. 1, and December 8, 1988, p. 6.

4. Kühne, Winrich, “Moscow scorns the ‘Comrades’ in S. Africa’s black townships,” Africa Analysis, December 12, 1986, p. 1 Google Scholar.

5. Kühne, Winrich, “A 1988 Update on Soviet Relations with Pretoria, the ANC, and the SACP,” CSIS Africa Notes, No. 89, September 1, 1988, p. 4 Google Scholar.

6. New York Times, March 16, 1989, pp. 1, 6.

7. See Tikhomirov, V. I., “South Africa: Is a Political Settlement Possible?” Issue: A Journal of Opinion, 27, 1, Winter 1988, p. 13 Google Scholar.

8. Primakov, Yevgeni, “USSR Policy on Regional Conflicts,” International Affairs, 6, 1988, p. 3 Google Scholar.

9. Fituni, Leonid L., “Thoughts on an Angolan-Namibian Settlement,” Issue: A Journal of Opinion, 27, 1, Winter 1988, p. 20 Google Scholar.

10. Keller, Bill, “Moscow Wants to Expedite a Settlement of Angola War,” New York Times, June 6, 1988, p. 4 Google Scholar.

11. Pick, Hella, “Namibia Independence Pact Signed,” Manchester Guardian Weekly, 140, 1, January 1, 1989, p. 8 Google Scholar.

12. U.S. Department of State, Southwestern Africa: Regional Brief, Washington D.C., Bureau of Public Affairs, Dec. 1988, p. 3.