No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2021
With fanfare befitting the arrival of a god of the Western material world, U.S. President Bill Clinton toured Southern Africa imparting “words of wisdom” along the way. His aim, we were told, was to see that the United States becomes Africa’s “true partner.” The reason being, according to Clinton, “[a]s Africa grows strong, America grows stronger ... Yes, Africa needs the world, but more than ever it is equally true that the world needs Africa.” To this end, the United States would pursue a mix of political and economic policies that included the African Crisis Response Initiative and the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act, both designed to foster “stability” and “prosperity” on the continent. Lofty goals, to be sure, but ends whose means are badly in need of interrogation. This article does just that: To wit, does Clinton, on behalf of U.S. policymakers, mean what he says? If so, in naming “peace” and “prosperity,” can he make them? Put differently, does the Clinton administration have the power to introduce order where there was chaos? Or will it only compound existing problems and visit new ones upon those who had few to begin with?
1. Vale, Peter and Maseko, Sipho, “South Africa and the African Renaissance,” International Affairs 74, no. 2 (1998): 273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2. On the potential role of “pivotal states” in U.S. foreign policy, see Chase, Robert, Hill, Emily, and Kennedy, Paul, “Pivotal States and U.S. Strategy,” Foreign Affairs 75, no.l (1996): 33–51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3. USAID/RCSA, Regional Integration Through Partnership and Participation: RCSA Strategic Plan 1997–2003 (Gaborone, August 1997)Google Scholar, 5 (hereafter cited as RCSA StrategicPlan 1997–2003).
4. Farber, Henry S. and Gowa, Joanne, “Polities and Peace,” International Security 20, no. 2 (1995): 123–146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5. William D. Graf, “Democratization ‘for’ the Third World: Critique of a Hegemonic Project,” Canadian Journal of Development Studies (special issue entitled “Governance, Democracy and Human Rights,” edited by Nasir Islam and David R. Morrison, 1996), 42–43.
6. For an analysis of the Botswana case in light of Clinton’s visit, see Swatuk, Larry A., “Botswana: What Clinton Didn’t See,” Southern Africa Report 13, no. 3 (1998): 11–14 Google Scholar.
7. Fukuyama, Francis, “The End of History?” The National Interest 16 (1989): 3–18 Google Scholar.
8. RCSA Strategic Plan 1997–2003, p. 16.
9. See in particular Stallings, Barbara, ed., Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10. Hettne, Bjorn, “Development, Security and World Order: A Regionalist Approach,” The European Journal of Development Research 9, no.l (1997): 83–106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hettne, Bjorn, “The New Regionalism: Implications for Development and Peace,” in Hettne, Bjorn and Inotai, Andras, eds., The New Regionalism: Implications for Global Development and International Security (Forssan Kirjapaino Oy: UNU/WIDER: 1994), 1–50 Google Scholar.
11. RCSA Strategic Plan 1997–2003, p. 2.
12. Swatuk, Larry A. and Black, David R., eds., Bridging the Rift: The New South Africa in Africa (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press 1997)Google Scholar.
13. RCSA Strategic Plan 1997–2003, pp. 76-77.
14. Business Day, October 19, 1998.
15. For example, see Good, Kenneth, “Development and Democracies: Liberal Versus Popular,” Africa Insight 27, no. 4 (1997): 253 Google Scholar.
16. World Bank, World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World (Washington, D.C.: Oxford University Press 1997), 35 Google Scholar.
17. Graf, “Democratization ‘for’ the Third World,” p. 51.
18. Mmegi, September 25–October 1, 1998.
19. See Sandbrook, Richard, “Transitions Without Consolidation: Democratization in Six African Cases,” Third World Quarterly 17, no. 1 (1996): 69–87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20. Kaunda, Jonathan Mayuyuka, “The State and Society in Malawi,” Commonwealth and Comparative Studies 36, no. 1 (1998): 66 Google Scholar.
21. Rousseau, Jean Jacques, in The Great Political Theorists (vol. 2), ed. Curtis, Michael (Harmondsworth: Penguin 1981), 32 Google Scholar.
22. Bienefeld, Manfred, “Structural Adjustment and the Prospects for Democracy in Southern Africa,” in Debating Development Discourse: Institutional and Popular Perspectives, eds. Moore, David and Schmitz, Gerry (London: Macmillan: 1986), 91 Google Scholar.