Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:08:08.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trees and farm boundaries: farm forestry, land tenure and reform in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Peter A. Dewees
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tree cultivation and management are a common form of land use in high-potential areas of Kenya. While some of these practices are related to economic considerations, such as markets and prices for specific tree products, others were derived from or developed in parallel with customary practices. This article traces the origins of contemporary demarcation practices in Kikuyu areas of Kenya, involving the planting of trees in hedges and windrows, from their customary antecedents. Customary law prescribed clear mechanisms for demarcating land to which rights of use had been acquired. These mechanisms, characterised principally by the planting of particular trees on the boundaries of land holdings, were given limited recognition by the colonial administration, and were subsequently incorporated (without any clear awareness of their customary role) in the contemporary body of land law which emerged as a result of the land reforms of the early 1960s. Land reforms tended to obscure customary distinctions between rights of control to trees and rights of use and access, by equating rights of control with rights of ownership. The result has been that rights of use and access, which had been guaranteed to the landless under customary law, were, for the most part, eliminated.

Résumé

La culture et l'exploitation des arbres sont des formes courantes d'usage de la terre dans les endroits du Kenya qui ont un fort potentiel. Tandis que certaines de ces pratiques sont liées à des considérations économiques, tel que les marchés et les prix pour des produits arboricoles spécifiques, d'autres ont été dérivés de ou développés en parallèle avec des pratiqués coutumieres. Cet article fait remonter les origines des pratiques de démarcations contemporaines dans les endroits Kikuyu du Kenya, entrainant la plantation d'arbres dans des haies, à leurs antécédents coutumiers. La loi coutumière a present des mécanismes clairs pout démarquer la terre pour laquelle les droits d'usage avaient ete acquis.

Ces mecanismes, caractérisés principalement par la plantation de certains arbres sur les limites des exploitations, ont été reconnus avec restriction par l'administration coloniale et ont été par la suite incorporés (sans une conscience bien claire de leur rôle coutumier) dans le corps des lois agraires contemporaines qui a emergé à la suite des réformes agraires du début des années 60. Les reformes agraires avaient tendance a obscurcir les distinctions coutumieres entre les droits de contrôle sur les arbres et les droits d'usage et d'accés, en égalant les droits de contrôle avec les droits de propriété. Le résultat en a été que les droits d'usage et d'accés, qui avaient été garanti à ceux sans terres sous la loi coutumiére, ont ete, pour la plupart, éliminés.

Type
Making a living in rural Kenya
Information
Africa , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 217 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernard, F. E. 1993. ‘Increasing variability in agricultural production: Meru District, Kenya, in the twentieth century’, in Turner, B. L. IIHyden, G. and Kates, R. (eds.). Population Growth and Agricultural Change in Africa, pp. 80–113. Gainesville, Fla.: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, P. N. 1991. Woodfuel, Women and Woodlots. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brokensha, D. W., Riley, B., and Castro, A. P. 1983. Fuelwood Use in Rural Kenya. Binghamton N.J.: Institute for Development Anthropology.Google Scholar
Castro, A. P. 1991a. ‘Indigenous Kikuyu agroforestry: a case study of Kirinyaga, Kenya’, Human Ecology 19 (1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, A. P. 1991b. ‘The southern Mount Kenya forest since independence: a social analysis of resource competition’, World Development 19(12), 1695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, M. P. 1978. ‘Capital and Household Production: the case of wattle in Kenya's Central Province, 1903-64’. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dewees, P. A. 1993. Trees, Land and Labour. Environment Department Paper No. 4. Washington D. C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Ecosystems. 1984. Unpublished land use inventory data base. Nairobi: Ecosystems Ltd.Google Scholar
Homan, F. D. 1963. ‘Succession to registered land in the African areas of Kenya’, Journal of Local Administration Overseas 2 (1), 49–54.Google Scholar
Kanogo, T. 1987. Squatters and the Roots of Mau Mau. Nairobi: James Currey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenya, Colony and Protectorate of. 1928. Forest Department Annual Report, 1928. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kanogo, T. 1929. Native Land Tenure in Kikuyu Province: Report of Committee. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kanogo, T. 1930. Forest Department Annual Report, 1930. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kanogo, T. 1932. Forest Department Annual Report, 1932. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kanogo, T. 1933. Forest Department Annual Report, 1933. Nariobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kanogo, T. 1944. Forest Department Annual Report, 1944. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kanogo, T. 1958. Fort Hall Annual Report, 1958. Nairobi.Google Scholar
Kitching, G. 1980. Class and Economic Change in Kenya. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leakey, L. S. B. 1977. The Southern Kikuyu before 1903 (three volumes). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, F. 1989. ‘Land and territory: the interface between two systems of land tenure, Murang'a District, Kenya’, Africa 59 (1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, F. 1990. ‘Gender and land rights in Murang'a District, Kenya’, Journal of Peasant Studies 17 (4), 609–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muriuki, G. 1974. A History of the Kikuyu, 1500-1900. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okoth-Ogendo, H. W. O. 1987. ‘Tenure of trees or tenure of lands’, in Raintree, J. B. (ed.), Land, Trees and Tenure: proceedings of an international workshop on Tenure Issues in Agroforestry, Nairobi, May 27-31, 1985: Nairobi and Madison, Wis.: International Council for Research in Agroforestry and the Land Tenure Centre.Google Scholar
Onalo, P. L. 1986. Land Law and Conveyancing in Kenya. Nairobi: Heineman.Google Scholar
Place, F., and Hazell, P. 1993. ‘Productivity effects of indigenous land tenure systems in sub-Saharan Africa’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (1), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, B. W., and Brokensha, D. W. 1988. The Mbeere in Kenya (two volumes). Lanham, Md: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Routledge, W. S. and K. 1910. With a Prehistoric People: the Akikuyu of British East Africa. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Shepherd, G. 1989. ‘Assessing Farmers' Tree Use and Tree-planting Priorities’. Unpublished report for the government of Kenya and the Overseas Development Administration. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Simmance, A. J. F. 1961. ‘Land redemption among the Fort Hall Kikuyu’, Journal of African Law 5 (2), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorrenson, M. P. K. 1967. Land Reform in Kikuyu Country: a study in government policy. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swynnerton, R. J. M. 1954. A Plan to Intensify the Development of African Agriculture in Kenya. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Throup, D. 1987. Economic and Social Origins of Mau Mau. Nairobi: James Currey.Google Scholar
Tiffen, M., Mortimore, M., and Gichuki, F. 1994. More People, Less Erosion: environment recovery in Kenya. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, Government of the. 1934. Kenya Land Commission: Evidence and Memorandum (three volumes). No. 91. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Tiffen, M. 1955. East Africa Royal Commission, 1953-55: report. Cmd. 9475. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Von Pischke, J. D. 1977. ‘The Political Economy of Farm Credit in Kenya’. Ph.D. dissertation, Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Wamagunda, B. 1989. ‘Effective forestry extension in support of agroforestry development’, in Kilewe, A. M.Kealey, K. M. and Kebaara, K. K. (eds.). Agro-forestry Development in Kenya: proceedings of the second Kenya National Seminar on Agroforestry, 7-16 November 1988, pp. 147–53. Nairobi: International Council for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar
Wright, J. W. 1956. ‘Reference marks in land settlement’, Journal of Administration VIII (1), 38–45.Google Scholar