Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:31:17.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Through the prism of a local tragedy: political liberalisation, regionalism and elite struggles for power in Cameroon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Dickson Eyoh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A prominent feature of political liberalisation in Cameroon (as elsewhere in Africa) is the increasing resort by elites to idioms of community (regional, religious and ethnic) and neo-traditional institutions like chieftaincy as a means of mobilising political support and reasserting control of local populations. Focusing on the anglophone part of Cameroon this study examines the historical roots of the salience of these phenomena in current struggles for power. It uses the circumstances surrounding the death of a chief in the South West Province to explain the ways in which elite reliance on these phenomena facilitates the linkage of locally specific, culturally encoded political conflict with competition for power at the national level, and provokes local populations into resisting state power, often through the reinvention of traditions of their own. The study concludes that popular scepticism about whether current political struggles will lead to fundamental changes in state–society relations is rooted in the ways in which elite politics are played out in local and regional spaces.

Résumé

Au Cameroun comme dans le reste de l’Afrique, la libéralisation politique est marquée par le fait que les élites ont de plus en recours aux idiomes communautaires (régionaux, religieux et ethniques) at aux institutions néotraditionnelles (comme l’autorité d’un chef) comme moyen de mobilisation du soutien politique et de réaffirmation du contrôile des populations locales. Cette étude examine les racines historiques de 1’importance de ces phénomènes dans les luttes de pouvoir qui s’opèrent actuellement dans la région anglophone du Cameroun. A partir des circonstances qui ont marqué le décès d’un chef de la Province du Sud-Ouest, cette étude tente d’expliquer comment les élites utilisent ces phénomènes pour faciliter le rapprochement entre les conflits politiques locaux enracinés dans la culture et la lutte pour le pouvoir au niveau national, et pour inciter les populations locales à s’opposer au pouvoir d’état, souvent en réinventant leurs traditions. L’étude en conclut que le scepticisme populaire quant à la capacité des conflits politiques actuels à changer fondamentalement les rapports entre l’état et la société est enraciné dans le jeu politique élitaire au niveau local et régional.

Type
The competitive regionalism of elites
Information
Africa , Volume 68 , Issue 3: The Politics of Primary Patriotism , July 1998 , pp. 338 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anglophone National Council. 1993a. The Buea Declaration. Limbe:Navi Group.Google Scholar
Anglophone National Council. 1993b. Draft Constitution of the Federal Republic of Cameroon. Limbe:Navi Group.Google Scholar
Ardener, E. 1970. ‘Witchcraft, economies and continuity of belief’, in M., Douglas (ed.), Witchcraft Confessions and Accusations, pp. 141–60. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Ardener, S. 1975. ‘Sexual insult and female militancy’, in S., Ardener (ed.), Perceiving Women. pp. 29–54. London: Malaby Press.Google Scholar
Ashforth, A. 1995. ‘Of Secrecy and the Commonplace: witchcraft and power in Soweto’ (mimeo). New York: Baruch College, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Austen, R. 1993. ‘The moral economy of witchcraft: an essay in comparative history’, in J., Comaroff and J., Comaroff (eds), Modernity and its Malcontents, pp. 89–110. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
d’Azevedo, M. 1995. ‘Ethnicity and democratization: Cameroon and Gabon’, in H., Glickman (ed.), Ethnic Conflict and Democratization in Africa, pp. 255–88. Atlanta, Ga.: African Studies Association Press.Google Scholar
Bayart, J-F. 1979. L’Etat au Cameroun. Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.Google Scholar
Bayart, J-F. 1993. The State in Africa: the politics of the belly London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Collectif, ‘Changer Cameroun’ (C3). 1992. Le Cameroun éclaté? Anthologie commentée des revendications ethniques. Yanounde: Editions C3.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J., and Comaroff, J. 1993. ‘Introduction’, in J., Comaroff and J., Comaroff (eds), Modernity and its Malcontents: ritual and power in postcolonial Africa, pp. xi–xxxvii. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Derrick, J. 1992. ‘Cameroon: one party, many parties and the state’, Africa Insight 22 (3), 165–78.Google Scholar
Eyoh, D. 1998. ‘Conflicting narratives of anglophone protest and the politics of identity in Cameroon’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies 16(2).Google Scholar
Fisiy, C. 1992. Power and Privilege in the Administration of Law: land reform and social differentiation in Cameroon. Research Report No. 48, Leiden: African Studies Centre.Google Scholar
Fisiy, C. 1995a. ‘Chieftaincy in the modern state: an institution at the crossroads of democratic change’, Paideuma 41, 49–62.Google Scholar
Fisiy, C. 1995b. ‘Power and the Quest for Recognition: pseudo-traditional titles among the new elite of Nso, north-west Cameroon’. Paper presented at the thirty-seventh annual conference of the (US) African Studies Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Fisiy, C, and Geschiere, P. 1991. ‘Sorcery, witchcraft and accumulation: regional variations in southwest Cameroon,’ Critique of Anthropology 11 (3), 251–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschiere, P. 1993. ‘Chiefs and colonial rule in Cameroon: inventing chieftaincy, French and British style’, Africa 63 (2), 151–75.Google Scholar
Geschiere, P., with Fisiy, C., 1994. ‘Domesticating personal violence: witchcraft, courts and confessions in Cameroon’, Africa 64 (3), 323–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jua, N. 1993. “The Production/Consumption of the Politics of Ethnicity and the Democratic Discourse in the Cameroonian Electoral Process’. Paper presented at the thirty-sixth annual conference of the (US) African Studies Association, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Jua, N. 1995. ‘Indirect rule in colonial and postcolonial Cameroon’, Paideuma 41, 39–47.Google Scholar
Kofele-Kale, N. 1985. ‘Ethnicity, regionalism and political power: a post-mortem on Ahidjo’s Cameroon’, in M., Schatzberg and I., Zartman (eds), The Political Economy of Cameroon pp. 53–82. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Konings, P. 1993. Labour Resistance in Cameroon: managerial strategies and labour resistance in the agro-industrial plantations of the Cameroon Development Corporation. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Konings, P. 1996. ‘Le “problème anglophone” au Cameroun dans les années 1990’, Politique africaine 62, 25–34.Google Scholar
Konings, P., and Nyamnjoh, F. B. 1997. ‘The anglophone problem in Cameroon’, Journal of Modern African Studies 35 (2), 207–29.Google Scholar
Krieger, M. 1994. ‘Cameroon’s democratic crossroads, 1990–94’, Journal of Modern African Studies 32 (4), 605–28.Google Scholar
Logo, P., and Menthong, H-L. 1996. ‘Crise de légitime et évidence de la continuité politique’, Politique africaine 62, 15–24.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. 1992. ‘Provisional notes on the postcolony’, Africa 62 (1), 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, P. J. 1991. ‘“Uneasy lies the head”: politics, economics and continuity of belief among the Yoruba in Nigeria’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 33 (1), 56–85.Google Scholar
Nkoum-ne-Ntseny, L-M. 1997. ‘Les “anglophones” et le processus d’élaboration de la constitution du 18 Janvier 1996’, in S., Meloneet al. (eds), La Reformè constitutionelle du 18 Janvier 1996 au Cameroun, pp. 200–29. Yaoundé: Fondation Friedrich Ebert au Cameroun et Association africaine de science politique.Google Scholar
Nyamnjoh, F. 1997. ‘Media, tribalism and democracy in Cameroon’, in Democracy in the Throes of Tribalism, pp. 45–64. Yaounde: Friedrich Ebert Foundation and Gerddes Cameroun.Google Scholar
Republique, Du Cameroon. 1993. Rapport général du deuxième recensement de la population et de l’habitat II, Yaounde: SOPECAM.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M., and Warmer, J-P. 1988. ‘Sorcery, power and the modern state in Cameroon’, Man 23 (1), 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Schatzberg. 1993. ‘Power, legitimacy and “democratisation” in Africa’, Africa 63 (4), 445–61.Google Scholar
Schilder, K. 1997. ‘Regional imbalance in northern Cameroon’, in Nkwi, P. and Nyamnjoh, F. (eds), Regional Balance and National Integration in Cameroon: lessons learned and the uncertain future, pp. 177–192. Yaounde: ASC/ ICASSRT.Google Scholar
Sindjoun, L. 1996. ‘Le champ social camerounais: désordre inventif, mythes simplifacateurs et stabilité hégémonique de l’état’, Politique africaine 62, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takougang, J. 1993. ‘The demise of Biya’s New Deal in Cameroon, 1982–92’, Africa Insight 23 (1), 91–101.Google Scholar
Takougang, J. 1997. ‘Cameroon: Biya and incremental reform’, in Clark, J. and Gardinier, D. (eds), Political Reform in Francophone Africa. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar