Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T16:13:48.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology overrule: pre-literate Akan orality and the musket

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

Gamel O. Wiredu Open the ORCID record for Gamel O. Wiredu [Opens in a new window]
Gamel O. Wiredu*
Affiliation:
Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration, Accra, Ghana / Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies, Wa, Ghana
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The history of the human–technology relation points to binary (positive and negative) evaluations of technology’s role. One reason for this binary is the limited view of technology in terms of physical and tangible devices. Another is an extreme global view of the relationship, which neglects global diversity. However, technology includes non-physical devices such as speech. Moreover, people hold different intellectual, historical and philological assumptions as the bases for their rule over technology. This article emphasizes the importance of language and global diversity as crucial dimensions of the human–technology relation. It is through language that humans are able to rule over technology, rather than being dominated by it. Taking language as a focal point, I expose the neglect of pre-literate orality as a way of engaging with technology and I espouse an orality perspective on our rule over technology. This perspective foregrounds human mindfulness as a basis for oral engagement with technology. It is developed based on analysis of historical data on oral language use by pre-literate Akan people of Ghana to rule over the musket. The article characterizes technology overrule according to a four-stage process: image recognition, technology reduction, technology reposition and image reproduction.

Résumé

Résumé

L’histoire de la relation entre l’homme et la technologie pointe des évaluations (positives et négatives) binaires du rôle de la technologie. Une raison de ce binaire est la vue limitée de la technologie en termes de dispositifs physiques et tangibles. Une autre raison est une vue globale extrême de la relation, qui néglige la diversité globale. Cependant, la technologie inclut des dispositifs non physiques comme la parole. De plus, les gens basent leur domination de la technologie sur différents axiomes intellectuels, historiques et philologiques. Cet article souligne l’importance du langage et de la diversité globale en tant que dimensions cruciales de la relation entre l’homme et la technologie. C’est à travers le langage que l’homme domine la technologie, au lieu d’être dominé par elle. Prenant comme point central le langage, l’auteur expose l’inattention portée à l’oralité d’avant l’écriture comme moyen d’aborder la technologie, et soutient une perspective d’oralité sur notre domination de la technologie. Cette perspective met en avant la pleine conscience humaine comme base d’approche orale de la technologie. Elle repose sur l’analyse de données historiques sur l’utilisation du langage oral par le peuple akan d’avant l’écriture au Ghana pour dominer le mousquet. L’article caractérise la domination de la technologie selon un processus en quatre étapes : reconnaissance de l’image, réduction de la technologie, repositionnement de la technologie et reproduction de l’image.

Resumo

Resumo

A história da relação entre o homem e a tecnologia aponta para avaliações binárias (positivas e negativas) do papel da tecnologia. Uma das razões para este binarismo é a visão limitada da tecnologia em termos de dispositivos físicos e tangíveis. Outra é uma visão global extrema da relação, que negligencia a diversidade global. No entanto, a tecnologia inclui dispositivos não físicos, como o discurso. Além disso, as pessoas têm diferentes pressupostos intelectuais, históricos e filológicos como base do seu domínio sobre a tecnologia. Este artigo sublinha a importância da linguagem e da diversidade global como dimensões cruciais da relação homem-tecnologia. É através da linguagem que os seres humanos são capazes de dominar a tecnologia, em vez de serem dominados por ela. Tomando a linguagem como ponto focal, exponho a negligência da oralidade pré-alfabetizada como forma de nos envolvermos com a tecnologia e defendo uma perspectiva de oralidade sobre o nosso domínio da tecnologia. Esta perspectiva coloca em primeiro plano a atenção humana como base para o envolvimento oral com a tecnologia. É desenvolvida com base na análise de dados históricos sobre a utilização da linguagem oral pelo povo Akan pré-alfabetizado do Gana para dominar o mosquete. O artigo caracteriza o domínio da tecnologia de acordo com um processo em quatro fases: reconhecimento da imagem, redução da tecnologia, reposicionamento da tecnologia e reprodução da imagem.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , August 2023 , pp. 414 - 434
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International African Institute

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adu Boahen, A. (1966) Topics in West African History. Schools edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Agyekum, K. (2022) Akan Kasadwini. Accra: University of Ghana Press.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. (2000) Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, P., Appiah, K. A. and Agyeman-Duah, I. (2007) Bu Me Bϵ: proverbs of the Akans. Banbury: Ayebia Clarke.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arhin, K. (1967) ‘The financing of the Ashanti expansion (1700–1820)’, Africa 37 (3): 283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle (2014) ‘On “technē” and “epistēmē”’ in Scharff, R. C. and Dusek, V. (eds), Philosophy of Technology: the technological condition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (2009) The Nature of Technology: what it is and how it evolves. New York NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1975) How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, G. (2022) ‘Sign language as a technology: existential and instrumental perspectives of Ugandan sign language’, Africa 92 (4): 430–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, A. G. A. (2006) ‘Some methodological controversies in African philosophy’ in Wiredu, K. (ed.), A Companion to African Philosophy. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Christaller, J. G. (1879) Twi Mmebusϵm Mpensa Ahansia Mmoano [Collection of Three Thousand Six Hundred Twi Proverbs]. Basel: Basel Evangelical Missionary Society.Google Scholar
Dove, G. (2018) ‘Language as a disruptive technology: abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 327 (1752): 20170135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, R. B. (1995) The Fall of the Asante Empire: the hundred-year war for Africa’s Gold Coast. New York NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. (1976) Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldblat, J. (2020) Agreements for Arms Control: a critical survey. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. (1977) The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gyekye, K. (1995) An Essay on African Philosophical Thought: the Akan conceptual scheme. Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hallen, B. (2000) The Good, the Bad, and the Beautiful: discourse about values in Yoruba culture. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, K. (1985) ‘The social anthropology of West Africa’, Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 243–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1977) The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hountondji, P. J. (1997) ‘African philosophy, myth and reality’ in Grinker, R. R. and Steiner, C. B. (eds), Perspectives on Africa. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kallinikos, J. (2012) ‘Form, function, and matter: crossing the border of materiality’ in Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. M. and Kallinikos, J. (eds), Materiality and Organizing: social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2000) ‘When things strike back: a possible contribution of “science studies” to the social sciences’, British Journal of Sociology 51 (1): 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (1962) A Sociology of Monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. M. and Kallinikos, J. (2012) Materiality and Organizing: social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likavčan, L. and Scholz-Wäckerle, M. (2018) ‘Technology appropriation in a de-growing economy’, Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 1666–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1976) ‘The German ideology’ in Collected Works. Volume 5. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (2001) On the Postcolony. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McCaskie, T. C. (2000) Asante Identities: history and modernity in an African village 1850–1950. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McCaskie, T. C. (2008) ‘Gun culture in Kumasi’, Africa 78 (3): 433–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1964) Understanding Media: the extensions of man. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, L. (1967) The Myth of the Machine I: technics and human development. New York NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J. (1982) Orality and Literacy: the technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, W. J. (2000) The Presence of the Word: some prolegomena for cultural and religious history. New York NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1994) Exploring the Black Box: technology, economics, and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech Acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. New York NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, T. W. (2017) ‘Telepresence and trust: a speech-act theory of mediated communication’, Philosophy and Technology 30: 443–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strate, L. (2017) Media Ecology: an approach to understanding the human condition. New York NY: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. Jr (1962) Medieval Technology and Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilks, I. (1993) Forests of Gold: essays on the Akan and the Kingdom of Asante. Athens OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Wiredu, K. (2006) ‘Introduction: African philosophy in our time’ in Wiredu, K. (ed.), A Companion to African Philosophy. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar