Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:16:23.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex Roles among the Nharo Bushmen of Botswana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Alan Barnard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Nharo are a Khoe- (‘Hottentot-’) speaking hunting and gathering people of the central-western Kalahari. Linguistically they are closely related to the G/wikhwe and G//anakhwe of the Central Kalahari Game Reserve and to several other, lesser-known, central Kalahari and Okavango Bushman peoples of Botswana. They are more distantly related to the extinct Khoekhoe (‘Hottentot’) herding peoples of the Cape Province of South Africa, and more distantly still, to the Nama Khoekhoe of Namibia. Lexicostatistical, cultural and genetic evidence suggests that the Khoe hunter-gatherers in general have lived independently from their herding relatives for some 2000 years, and that the Nharo in particular have lived in close contact with the !Kung and possibly also the !Kõ (both non-Khoe-speaking Bushman peoples) for a considerable part of that time. The primary purpose of this article is to present a description of selected Nharo institutions and customs, with reference to sex differentiation; but first a brief look at the Nharo settlement pattern is necessary.

Résumé

Sex roles among the Nharo Bushmen of Botswana

Les Nharo du Botswana sont une population boschiman de langue khoe, établie au centre du Kalahari occidental. Le présent article examine certaines de leurs institutions sociales et de leurs coutumes par rapport à la différenciation sexuelle. Cette étude porte particuliérement sur les Nharo du centre, ceux du groupe appelé N//wa//xe.

Les Nharo vivent en bandes peu iportantes, à proximité chacune d'une mare. Les hommes chassent le gros et le petit gibier, tandis que les femmes procèdent à la collecte des végétaux comestibles et du bois de chauffage, vont chercher l'eau et font la cuisine. Les garçons Nharo du Centre apprennent les techniques de la chasse dès leur jeune âge, mais ils ne sont pas soumis à une cérémonie d'initiation complète à l'âge de la puberté, contrairement aux garçons d'autres groupes boschimans; ils ne sont pas obligés d'avoir une “medecine” de chasse. Par contre, les jeunes filles Nharo subissent une cérémonie d'initiation minutieuse au moment de leurs premières règies. Au cours de cette cérémonie, un homme, “l'élan mâle”, se livre en dansant à une poursuite symbolique des femmes de la bande, autour de la hutte qù sont enfermèes les initiées. Les deux cérémonies soulignent les aspects différents des rôles masculins et féminins.

Les rôles des sexes sont particulièrement importants en ce qui concerne la parenté. Les Nharo classent chaque membre de la société en membre d'une catégorie de parenté, et ceci détermine en partie le comportement que l'on attend des individus. Comme parmi d'autres populations d'Afrique australe, la relation frère/soeur est importante, bien que les siblings de sexe opposé aient une relation qui leur impose de “s'éviter” ou de se respecter. Contrairement à d'autres populations boschimans, les Nharo n'offrent pas de prestations en nature au moment du mariage; par contre, le mariage et la naissance du premier enfant donnent lieu à l'échange de toute une série de cadeaux. Il existe parmi les Nharo une égalité sexuelle relative, et le divorce est facile pour les deux sexes.

Enfin, il y a une circonstance où les rôles des femmes et des hommes sont particulièrement distincts : la danse des guérisseurs. Les femmes soutiennent les hommes en tapant des mains et en chantant, tandis que les hommes dansent, et ceux des hommes quie sont guérisseurs entrent en transe afin de guérir diverses maladies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 115 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, A. J. 1976. Nharo Bushman Kinship and the Transformation of Khoi Kin Categories. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Barnard, A. J. 1978. ‘Universal systems of kin categorization,’ African Studies 37(1):69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, A. J. 1979a. ‘Kalahari Bushman settlement patterns,’ in Burnham, P. and Ellen, R. F. (eds.) Social and Ecological Systems (ASA Monographs 18). London: Academic Press. 131–44.Google Scholar
Barnard, A. J. 1979b. ‘Nharo Bushman medicine and medicine men,’ Africa 49(1):68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleek, D. F. 1928. The Naron: A Bushman Tribe of the Central Kalahari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Draper, P. 1975. ‘IKung women: contrasts in sexual egalitarianism in foraging and sedentary contexts,’ in Reiter, R. P. (ed.) Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York and London: Monthly Review Press. 77–109.Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, J. A. 1936. The Korana: An Account of Their Customs and Their History, with Texts. Cape Town: Maskew Miller.Google Scholar
Guenther, M. G. 1975. ‘San acculturation and incorporation in the ranching areas of the Ghanzi district: some urgent anthropological issues,’ Botswana Notes and Records 7:167–70.Google Scholar
Guenther, M. G. 1977. ‘Bushman hunters as farm labourers,’ Canadian Journal of African Studies 11(2): 195–203.Google Scholar
Hahn, T. 1881. Tsuni-//goam: The Supreme Being of the Khoi-khoi. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Heinz, H. J. 1966. The Social Organisation of the !ko Bushmen. M.A. thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Heinz, H. J. 1978. ‘The male initiation of the !ko Bushmen and its acculturative changes.’ Paper read at the International Conference on Hunter-Gatherers, Paris.Google Scholar
Hoernle, A. W. 1918. ‘Certain rites of transition and the conception of !nau among the Hottentots,’ Harvard African Studies 2: 65–82.Google Scholar
Hoernle, A. W. 1925. ‘The social organization of the Nama Hottentots of Southwest Africa,’ American Anthropologist 27(1):l–24.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, H. 1910. ‘Die =Auin. Ein Beitrag zur Buschmannforschung,’ Mitteilungen aus den deutschen Schutzgebieten 23(3): 135–60.Google Scholar
Krige, E. J. 1964. ‘Property, cross-cousin marriage, and the family cycle among the Lobedu,’ in Gray, R. F. and Gulliver, P. H. (eds.) The Family Estate in Africa. London: Routledge & KeganPaul. 155–95.Google Scholar
Krige, E. J. 1975. ‘Asymmetrical matrilateral cross-cousin marriage: the Lovedu case,’ African Studies 34(4):231–57.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1970. ‘The Kalagari and the jural consequences of marriage,’ Man (n.s.) 5(3):466–82.Google Scholar
Krige, E. J. 1975. ‘The social structure of the Sotho-speaking peoples of southern Africa,’ Africa 45(1):67–81; (2): 139-49.Google Scholar
Lee, R. B. 1974. ‘Male-female residence arrangements and political power in human huntergatherers,’ Archives of Sexual Behavior 3(2): 167–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, L. 1957. ‘The kin terminology system of the !Kung Bushmen,’ Africa 27(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, L. 1961. ‘Sharing, talking and giving: relief of social tensions among !Kung Bushmen, Africa 31(3):231–49.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. 1969. ‘The medicine dance of the !Kung Bushmen,’ Africa 39(4):347–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, L. 1976. The !Kung of Nyae Nyae. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passarge, S. 1907. Die Buschmänner der Kalahari. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. 1930. The Khoisan Peoples of South Africa: Bushmen and Hottentots. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Silberbauer, G. B. 1963. ‘Marriage and the girl's puberty ceremony of the G/wi Bushmen,’ Africa 33(4): 12–24.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. 1965. Report to the Government of Bechuanaland on the Bushman Survey. Gaberones: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. W. 1977. Hxaro: A Regional System of Reciprocity for Reducing Risk among the IKung San. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. (Two volumes).Google Scholar