Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T20:56:22.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population, economy and domestic groups – the Kitui case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Michael O'Leary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Major factors which influence the pace of change in rural districts of Kenya relate to the nature of the local environment and traditional economy, population density and the degree of integration with the national economy and polity. In general change takes place more rapidly in the better watered high potential areas than in the semi-arid or arid areas. Kitui is a district in the semi-arid zone of the Eastern Province, Kenya. Traditionally its residents – the Kitui Akamba – were agro-pastoralists. With the establishment of British rule they expanded cultivation into former rangelands, and grazed their animals‘cattle and small stock – in areas once the preserve of wild life. This generated a resurgence in the local economy mirrored in the fact that the young men adamantly resisted administrative pressure to induce them to become labour migrants.

Résumé

Population, économie et groupes domestiques – Le cas Kitui

L'article décrit l'impact de la croissance de la population et de la migration de la main-d'oeuvre sur la grandeur et la forme des families Akamba au Kitui, un district semi-désertique dans la Province Est du Kenya. Les matériaux tirent leur origine de deux communités voisines, la première Ngangani, située dans les plaines, et la seconde Syoyua située sur un plateau, toutes deux ayant des densités de population et des économies constrastantes. Les frères qui travaillent en dehors du district tendent à placer leurs femmes dans une commune agricole où réside de préférence un frère resté sur le territoire pouvant être responsable de toutes les femmes et superviser leurs travaux agricoles et la garde des troupeaux. Cet arrangement permet aussi aux femmes de partager les tâches domestiques ainsi que la supervision des enfants. Les travailleurs émigrants des pauvres families du Ngangani essayent de fonder des foyers loin de leurs pères afin de minimiser leur ingérence. Manque de confiance entre frères et accusations de sorcellerie entre femmes précipitent aussi la rupture des communautés agricoles. Au Syoyua où il y a une insuffisance de terre, les homines tendent à construire sur les parcelles de leurs pères, plutôt que de s'établir dans des fermes indépendantes, ce qui a engendré des ménages de quatre générations. Traditionnellement un homme jouit d'un certain prestige s'il possède beaucoup de femmes et d'enfants; de nos jours cependant la grande ferine communautaire comme signe de rang social élevé laisse place aux nouveaux symboles de prestige tel que le nombre d'enfants éduqués, les conditions d'habitat améliorées et la possession d'un magasin local.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 64 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asad, T. 1970. The Kababish Arabs: Power, Authority and Consent in a Nomadic Tribe, London: C. Hurst.Google Scholar
Bauer, Dan F. 1977. Household and Society in Ethiopia. Michigan: African Studies Centre, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Dundas, Charles C. 1913. ‘History of Kitui’, JRAI 43. 480–549.Google Scholar
Dundas, Charles C. 1915. ‘The organisation and laws of some Bantu tribes in East Africa,’ JRAI 45. 234–306.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. 1967. ‘A sociological analysis of witch beliefs in a Mysore village’, in Middleton, J. (ed.), Magic, Witchcraft and Curing. Austin and London: University of Texas Press. 135–54. Reprinted from The Eastern Anthropologist 12(4) 1959. 234–51.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1951. Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. 1958. ‘Introduction’ in Goody, Jack (ed.) The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–14.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max 1950. ‘Kinship and marriage among the Lozi of Northern Rhodesia and the Zulu of Natal,’ in (eds.) Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, C. D.African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gulliver, P. 1964. ‘The Arusha family,’ in (ed.) Gray, R. F. and Gulliver, P. H.The Family Estate in Africa. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hart, J. K. 1971. ‘Migration and tribal identity among the Frafra of Ghana,’ Journal of Asian and African Studies VI(1). 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, G. 1969. The Akamba (2nd ed., first published in 1920). New York: Negro Universities Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, J. and Kershaw, G. (eds.). 1965. The Central Tribes of the North-eastern Bantu (revised edition). London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
Ndeti, K. 1972. Elements of Akamba Life. Nairobi: East African Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ojany, Francis F., and Ogendo, Reuben B. 1973. Kenya: a Study in Physical and Human Geography, Nairobi: Longman.Google Scholar
O'Leary, M. F. 1980a. ‘Responses to drought in Kitui District, Kenya,’ Disasters 4(3). 315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Leary, M. F. 1980b. ‘The growth and decline of household herds in eastern Kitui’, Ethnos 8(3–4). 211–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Leary, M. F. (forthcoming) From Livestock to Wages: Change in the Economy and Society of the Kitui Akamba.Google Scholar
Rheubottom, David B. 1976. ‘Time and form: contemporary Macedonian households and the zadruga controversy’, in Byrnes, Robert F. (ed.) Communal Families in the Balkans. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Watson, W. 1958. Tribal Cohesion in a Money Economy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar