Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:49:10.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Bridewealth and Meaning among the Rukuba, Plateau State, Nigeria1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2012

Jean-Claude Muller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Much ink has been spilled over the problem of bridewealth, its meaning and its functions. As Gray (1960) has summarized it, the debate first focused on refuting the idea that bridewealth was a kind of payment for the purchase of a wife, and this question still lingers on without having been quite solved. Others have seen in bridewealth a transference of rights and duties over a woman from the woman's group to the husband's group. Leaving aside the economic aspect of the transaction, this view seems particularly valid with regard to societies in which different amounts of bridewealth may be given to obtain different sets of rights and duties over spouses and their offspring (Bohannan 1949; Horton 1969; Williamson 1962). These ideas about bridewealth as a regulator of rights and duties over spouses and children are now generally agreed upon so that Goody (1973: 3), one of the acknowledged experts in these matters, can write that: ‘the relative size of payment is in a general sense linked with the quantum of rights transferred.’ Thus, generally, in societies having several kinds of marriages with a concomitant variation in bridewealth between the kinds of marriages, the rights over the woman and her children will also vary according to the amount paid, more rights being conveyed with a more expensive payment (Goody 1973: 16-17).

Résumé

SUR LE PRIX DE LA FIANCEÉ ET SA SIGNIFICATION CHEZ LES RUKUBA, PLATEAU-STATE, NIGÉRIA

Cet article examine les différents types de manages que lón trouve chez les Rukuba ainsi que les diverses prestations, ou les absences de prestations, qui les accompagnent. Cette dialectique entre prestations et non prestations est un métalangage qui contredit les opinions reçues qui veulent que la quantité de droits transférés varie en proportion directe du prix de la fiancée dans les sociétés qui ont plusieurs formes de mariage car, chez les Rukuba, ce sont les mariages sans prix de la fiancée qui sont investis des droits les plus importants. Le système rukuba est ensuite analysé comme l'actualisation la plus compliquée d'un groupe de transformations combinant un certain nombre de solutions simples—mariage par échange de soeurs sans prix de la fiancée, échange généralisé sans prix de la fiancée, échange généralisé avec prix de la fiancée qu'on trouve dans les sociétés ‘classiques’ africaines ainsi que les mariages secondaires—solutions qui sont employées seules par les sociétés bordant les Rukuba. Ceux-ci ont combiné les diverses formes que l'on trouve à leurs frontières pour leur donner une signification personnelle et sui generis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 161 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ames, G. C. 1934 Gazetteer of Plateau Province. Jos: Niger Press for Native Administration. (Reprinted 1972, London: Frank Cass.)Google Scholar
Baker, T. M. 1954 The Social Organisation of the Birom. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University College, London.Google Scholar
Bohannan, L. 1949 ‘Dahomean marriage: a revaluation,’ Africa 19: 273–87.Google Scholar
de Dampierre, E. 1967 Un ancien royaume Bandia du Haut-Oubangui. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. 1967 ‘The Anaguta of Nigeria: suburban primitives,’ in Steward, J. (ed.) Contemporary Changes in Traditional Societies (Vol. 1, Introduction and African Tribes). urbana University Press. 360–505.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 1975 Tribes, states, and transformations, in Bloch, M. (ed.) Marxist Analyses and Social Anthropology. (ASA Studies 13.) London: Malaby Press. 161–202.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1973 ‘Bridewealth and dowry in Africa and Eurasia,’ in Goody, J. and Tambiah, S. J. (eds) Bridewealth and Dowry. Cambridge University Press. 1–58.Google Scholar
Gray, R. F. 1960 ‘Sonjo bride-price and the question of African “wife-purchase,’ American Anthropologist 62 (1): 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, H. D. 1953 Peoples of the Plateau Area of Northern Nigeria. London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
Horton, R. 1969 ‘From fishing village to city-state. A social history of New Calabar,’ in Douglas, M. and Kaberry, P. M. (eds) Man in Africa. London: Tavistock Publications. 37–58.Google Scholar
Hurault, J. 1956 Notes sur la structure sociale des Bamiléké. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1975 ‘The social structure of the Sotho-speaking peoples of Southern Africa,’ Africa 45(1): 67–81; (2): 139–149.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. 1949 Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: P.U.F. (Second edition: Paris: Mouton, 1967.)Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, c. 1966 ‘The future of kinship studies. The Huxley Memorial Lecture 1965,’ in Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland for 1965. 13–22.Google Scholar
Mexsek, C. K. 1931 Tribal Studies in Northern Nigeria. Vol. II. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Meek, C. K. 1936 ‘Marriage by exchange in Nigeria. A disappearing institution,’ Africa IX (1): 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. C. 1969 ‘Preferential marriage among the Rukuba of Benue-Plateau State, Nigeria,’ American Anthropologist 71 (6): 1057–61.Google Scholar
Muller, J. C. 1972 ‘Ritual marriage, symbolic fatherhood and initiation among the Rukuba (Benue-Plateau State, Nigeria),’ Man (n.s.) 7 (2): 283–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. C. 1973a ‘De l'importance d'avoir deux maris,’ in Sauter, G. (ed.) L'Homme, hier et aujourd'hui. Recueil d'études en hommage à Leroi-Gourhan. Paris: Cujas. 445–56.Google Scholar
Muller, J. C. 1973b ‘On preferential/prescriptive marriage and the function of kinship systems. The Rukuba case (Benue-Plateau State, Nigeria),’ American Anthropologist 75 (5): 1563–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. C. 1975 ‘La royaute divine chez les Rukuba, Benue-Plateau State, Nigeria,’ LéHomme XV (1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. C. 1976 Parenté et mariage chez les Rukuba (Etat Benue-Plateau, Nigeria). Coll. ‘Les Cahiers de l'Homme’. Paris; La Haye: Mouton et Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. C. and Sangree, W. H. 1973 ‘Irigwe and Rukuba marriage: A comparison,’ Canadian Journal of African Studies VII (1): 27–57.Google Scholar
Rehfisch, F. 1960 ‘The dynamics of multilineality on the Mambila Plateau,’ Africa 30: 246–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangree, W. H. 1969 ‘Going home to mother: traditional marriage among the Irigwe of Benue-Plateau State, Nigeria,’ American Anthropologist 71: 1046–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, E. P. 1960 ‘The Mossi Pogsioure,’ Man 60: 20–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedley, A. 1967 Kinship and Social Organization among the Birom of Northern Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Smedley, A. 1974 ‘Women of Udu: survival in a harsh land,’ in Matthiasson, G. J. (ed.) Many Sisters: Women in Cross-CulturalPerspective. New York: The Free Press. 205–28.Google Scholar
Tardits, C. 1960 Les Bamiléké de l'ouest Cameroun. Paris: Berger-Levrault.Google Scholar
Tardits, C. 1970 ‘Femmes à crédit,’ in Pouillon, J. et Maranda, P. (eds) Echanges et Communications. La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tardits, C. 1974 ‘Prix de la femme et mariage entre cousins croisés. Le cas des Bemba d'Afrique Centrale,’ L'Homme XIV (2): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willamson, K. 1962 ‘Changes in the marriage system of the Okrika Ijo,’ Africa 32: 53–60.Google Scholar