Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:59:16.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The myth of the Zulu homestead: archaeology and ethnography1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Martin Hall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To those outside the anthropological disciplines, the Zulu are probably the best known chiefdom of southern Africa. Zulu military prowess acted as a sharp break on the process of colonial expansion in the nineteenth century and led to a series of battles which have been immortalized on celluloid and in the more popular historical accounts of the era. Despite this, the Zulu have prompted a comparatively sparse ethnography that is based largely on the work of nineteenth-century observers and is less comprehensive than the literature on some other southern African communities.

Résumé

Le mythe de la ferme Zoulou: archéologie et ethnographie

On présume généralement que le village Zoulou se conforme à un type standard défini par une série de cercles concentriques. On peut cependant soutenir, que ce modèle ne repose que sur une base d'observation étroite, spécifique dans le temps et dans l'espace, et que l'evidence archéologique suggère une variété considerable dans la forme d'installation de la région connue sous le nom vague de ‘Zululand’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 65 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryant, A. T. 1929. Olden times in Zululand and Natal. London: Longman, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. T. 1949. The Zulu people. Pietermaritzburg: Shuter and Shooter.Google Scholar
Davies, O. 1971. ‘Excavations at Blackburn’, S.Afr.archaeol.Bull. (26). 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jager, E. J. 1964. ‘Settlement types of the Nguni and Sotho tribes’, Fort Hare Papers (3). 19–30.Google Scholar
Guy, J. 1980. ‘Ecological factors in the rise of Shaka and the Zulu Kingdom’, in Marks, S. and Atmore, A. (eds.), Economy and society in pre-industrial South Africa. London: Longman. 102–19.Google Scholar
Hal, M. 1981. Settlement patterns in the Iron Age of Zululand: An Ecobgical Interpretation. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Hall, M. and Mack, K. 1983. ‘The outline of an eighteenth-century economic system in south-east Africa’, Ann.S.Afr.Mus. 91(2). 163–94.Google Scholar
Hall, M. and Maggs, T. 1979. ‘Nqabeni: A later Iron Age site in Zululand.’, S.Afr.archaeol.Soc.Goodwin Series (3). 159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M, 1969. The rise of anthropological theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hedges, D. W. 1978. Trade and politics in southern Mozambique and Zululand in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. School of Oriental and African Studies, London, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Holleman, J. F. 1940. ‘Die twee-eenheidsbeginsel in die sosiale en politieke samelewing van die Zulu’, Bantu Studies (14). 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krige, E. J. 1936. The social system of the Zulus. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1980. ‘Symbolic dimensions of the Southern Bantu homestead’, Africa 50(1). 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, A. 1982. Wives for cattle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Maggs, T. 1976. Iron Age communities of the southern Highveld. Pietermaritzburg: Natal Museum.Google Scholar
Maggs, T. 1980. ‘The Iron Age sequence south of the Vaal and Pongola Rivers: some historical implications’, J.Afr.Hist. 22(1). 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston-Whyte, E. and Sibisi, H. 1975. ‘Ethnographic oddity or ecological sense? Nyuswa-Zulu descent groups and land allocation’, African Studies 34(4). 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sansom, B. 1974. ‘Traditional economic systems.’, in Hammond-Tooke, W. D. (ed) The Bantu-Speaking peoples of southern Africa. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 135–76.Google Scholar
Schrire, C. 1980. ‘An analysis of human behaviour and animal extinctions in South Africa and Australia in later Pleistocene times’, S.Afr.archaeol.Bull. 35. 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M. 1974. ‘Material culture’, in Hammond-Tooke, W. D. (ed) The Bantu-Speaking peoples of southern Africa. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 85–134.Google Scholar
Slater, H. 1976. Transitions in the political economy of south-east Africa before 1840. University of Sussex, Brighton, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1970. The struggle for control of southern Mozambique, 1720–1835. University of.California, Los Angeles, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Van Warmelo, N. J. 1935. A preliminary survey of the Bantu tribes of South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Walton, J. 1956. African Village. Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
Webb, C. de B. and Wright, J. B. 1976. The James Stuart Archive 1. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
Webb, C. de B. 1979. The James Stuart Archive 2. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
Webb, C. de B. 1982. The James Stuart Archive 3. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1978. ‘Pre-Shakan age-group formation among the northern Nguni’, Natalia 8. 22–30.Google Scholar