Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:03:49.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mozambican National Resistance Movement (RENAMO): a study in the destruction of an African country

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Margaret Hall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

RENAMO is a shadowy movement and ill-understood, save for its well-established genesis as a military artefact of the Rhodesians, then its transition in 1980 to South African patronage. Lacking all the features we have come to associate with successful insurgencies in Africa, such as a charismatic leadership or easily identifiable ideology, it has failed to develop a political identity commensurate with its military strength. It has no clearly defined regional base, relies on widespread forced recruitment, and behaves with notorious brutality towards the civilian population. Yet it operates throughout the length and breadth of Mozambique, and holds the state in virtual paralysis. Since it lacks rear bases and therefore depends upon local provisioning, it must be able to obtain compliance over large areas of rural Mozambique. That also implies effective organisation.

Résumé

Le Mouvement National de Résistance au Mozambique (RENAMO): une étude de la destruction d'un pays africain

Cet article fait la synthèse de matériels provenant de diverses sources traitant de l'organisation et des opérations internes du Mouvement National de Résistance au Mozambique (RENAMO). Il étudie comment une organisation ayant si peu à offrir qu'elle doit compter sur un vaste recrutement forcé peut atteindre un tel succès contre l'état du Mozambique. Bien que l'article affirme que RENAMO a effectivement pris racine localement, malgré ses origines externes et que de ce fait, il a pu se développer grâce au mécontement paysan vis à vis des politiques économiques FRELIMO, les constatations suggèrent que les faiblesses structurelles de l'état du Mozambique et le degré de coercition violente employée par RENAMO contre la population civile représentent les facteurs les plus importants.

La première partie de cet article relate principalement des faits. La seconde partie souligne en particulier les processus internes engendrés par la déstabilisation. Elle conclut que ce mouvement est capable de détruire davantage le Mozambique. Ainsi, il n'existe pas d'autre alternative pratique pour s'accommoder de la situation que la violente brutalité du mouvement et le manque de ressemblance à ce qui est normalement considéré comme parti politique en tant que tel, ce qui pose d'importants problèmes pour la forme qu'un réglement politique de la guerre au Mozambique pourrait prendre.

Type
Attacking the State
Information
Africa , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 39 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, R. L., and Atkinson, R. C. 1985. Introduction to Psychology, 9th edn. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.-F. 1986. ‘Civil society in Africa’, in Chabal, P. (ed.), Political Domination in Africa, pp. 109–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Bragança, A., and Depelchin, J. 1988. ‘From the idealization of Frelimo to the understanding of Mozambique recent history’, Review 11: 95–117.Google Scholar
Bourdillon, M. F. C. 1984–1985. ‘Religious symbols and political change’, Zambezia 12: 39–54.Google Scholar
Chabal, P. (ed.). 1986. Political Domination in Africa: reflections on the limits of power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, African Studies Series 50.Google Scholar
Cilliers, J. K. 1985. Counter-insurgency in Rhodesia. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Clarence-Smith, G. 1989. ‘The roots of the Mozambican counter-revolution’, Southern African Review of Books, April/May, 7–10.Google Scholar
Dempster, C., and Tomkins, D. 1978. Firepower. London: Corgi Books.Google Scholar
Dodge, C. P., and Raundalen, M. (eds.). 1987. War, Violence, and Children in Uganda. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Duarte, R. T. 1987. ‘Contribuição para o estudo dos grupos populacionais em Moçambique’, Trabalhos de arqueologia e antropologia 4, 31–45. Maputo: Universidade de Eduardo Mondlane.Google Scholar
Fauvet, P./Clarence-Smith, W. 1989. Correspondence in Southern African Review of Books, August/September, pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
Finnegan, W. 1989 a. ‘A reporter at large’, Part I, New Yorker, 22 May, 43–76.Google Scholar
Finnegan, W. 1989 b. ‘A reporter at large’, Part II, New Yorker, 29 May, 69–96.Google Scholar
Flower, K. 1987. Serving Secretly. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Geffray, C., and Pedersen, M. 1988. ‘Nampula en guerre’, Politique Africaine 29, special edition Mozambique: guerre et nationalismes, 18–40.Google Scholar
Gunn, G. 1987. ‘Post-Nkomati Mozambique’, in Kitchen, H. (ed.), Angola, Mozambique and the West, pp. 83–104. Washington: Washington Papers no. 130.Google Scholar
Gunn, G. 1989. ‘The Glissano era—Mozambique comes to terms with itself’, Africa Insight 19 (1): 16–20.Google Scholar
Hanlon, J. 1984. Mozambique: the revolution under fire. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Henriksen, T. H. 1983. Revolution and Counterrevolution: Mozambique's war of independence 1964–1974. London: Rex Collings.Google Scholar
Heimele, K. 1988. Land Struggles and Social Differentiation in Southern Mozambique: acase study of Chokwe, Limpopo 1950–1987. Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies, Research Report 82.Google Scholar
Hodza, H., and Fortune, G. 1979. Shona Praise Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Honwana, R. 1988. The Life History of Raúl Honwana: an insider view of Mozambique from colonialism to independence, 1905–1975, edited by Isaacman, A. F.. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, H., and Ottaway, M. 1987. ‘State power consolidation in Mozambique’, in Keller, E. J. and Rothchild, D. (eds.), Afro-Marxist Regimes: ideology and public policy, pp. 43–55. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Isaacson, A. F. 1976. The Tradition of Resistance in Mozambique: anti-colonial activity in the Zambesi Valley 1850–1921. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Johnson, P., and Martin, D. 1986. ‘Mozambique: to Nkomati and beyond’, in Johnson, P., and Martin, D. (eds.), Destructive Engagement: Southern Africa at war, pp. 1–41. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.Google Scholar
Johnson, P., 1989. Apartheid Terrorism: the de-stabilisation report. A report on the devastation of the frontline states prepared for the Commonwealth Committee of Foreign Ministers on South Africa. London: Commonwealth Secretariat in association with James Currey (London) and Indiana University Press (Bloomington and Indianapolis).Google Scholar
Junod, H. A. 1962. The Life of a South African Tribe. New York: University Books.Google Scholar
Lan, D. 1985. Guns and Rain: guerrillas and spirit-mediums in Zimbabwe. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Magaia, L. 1988. Dumba Nengue, Run for Your Life: peasant tales of tragedy in Mozambique. New Jersey: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
May, R. 1989. ‘Internai Dimensions of Warfare in Chad’, paper presented to an African Studies Association of the United Kingdom (ASAUK) symposium in Cambridge, May 1989.Google Scholar
Minter, W./Clarence-Smith, G. 1989. Correspondence in Southern African Review of Books, June/July, 22–3.Google Scholar
Moorcraft, P. 1987. ‘Mozambique's long civil war: RENAMO—puppets or patriots?’, International Defense Review, 10/1987, 1, 313–16.Google Scholar
Mozambique Country Report, Courier, no. 114, March-April 1989.Google Scholar
Newitt, M. 1974. ‘Towards a history of modern Moçambique’, Rhodesian History 7 (5), 33–7.Google Scholar
Ranger, T. O. 1985. Peasant Consciousness and Guerrilla War in Zimbabwe. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Reynolds, P. 1986. ‘Some concepts of childhood drawn from the ideas and practices of traditional healers’, Zambezia 13(1): 1986, 1–10.Google Scholar
Riches, D. (ed.). 1986. The Anthropology of Violence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roesch, O. 1988. ‘Rural Mozambique in the Baixo Limpopo’, Review of African Political Economy 41: 73–91.Google Scholar
Rudebeck, L. 1988. ‘Kandjadja, Guinea-Bissau 1976–1986’, Review of African Political Economy 41: 17–29.Google Scholar
Rudebeck, L. 1988/1989. ‘Conditions of People's Development in Postcolonial Africa’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Saul, J. S. 1987. ‘Development and counterdevelopment strategies in Mozambique’, in Keller, E. J. and Rothchild, D. (eds.), Afro-Marxist Regimes: ideology and public policy, pp. 109–53. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinley, L. 1979. Drawn from the Plains: life in the wilds of Southern Africa. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. R. 1989. ‘South Africa's war in Mozambique’, Armed Forces, June, 255–9.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J. 1985. ‘From Rovuma to Maputo: Mozambique's guerrilla war’, Reason, December, 31–8.Google Scholar
Gersony, R. 1988. Summary ofMozambican Refugee Accounts of Principally Conflict-related Experience in Mozambique. Washington: Bureau for Refugee Programs, Department of State.Google Scholar
Minter, W. 1989. The Mozambican National Resistance (RENAMO) as Described by Ex-participants. Washington: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Mozambican National Resistance Movement. 1981. Manifest and Program, RENAMO Department of Information (no address given, but probably Cascais).Google Scholar
Dhlakama, Afonso, in International Herald Tribune, 14 September 1983; Welt, 6 January 1989; O Secuto, 9 June 1989.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Evo, in Defense and Diplomacy 3 (9), September 1985, 45–9.Google Scholar
João, Chivaca, in Tempo, 11 December 1988, 6–8.Google Scholar
Magaia, Lina, in Race and Class 30 (4), 1989, 26.Google Scholar
Reis, Constantino, in a special supplement to the Mozambique news agency (AIM) Bulletin, no. 102, January 1985; and in Domingo, 16 December 1984.Google Scholar
Wells, Melissa (US Ambassador), in Africa Report, March-April 1989, 20.Google Scholar
Mozambique: Tempo, 22 September 1985, 27 October 1985, 4 December 1988; Domingo, 16 December 1984; 23 October 1985; Noticias, 13 July 1988, 29 October-2 November 1985; Mozambiquefile, January 1989.Google Scholar
Other African: Rand Daily Mail, 7 November 1979; Sunday Mail, 30 August 1981,4 October 1987, Herald, 2 August 1989, 6 September 1989 (Zimbabwe); Malawi News, 27 May-2 June 1989.Google Scholar
UK: Independent, 29 May 1989,10 August 1989; Guardian, 14 February 1989; Sunday Telegraph, 18 December 1988; New African, May 1989; Southscan 4 (34), 15 September 1989.Google Scholar
Other: Der Spiegel, no. 47/87.Google Scholar