Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:44:01.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MONEY-GO-ROUND: PERSONAL ECONOMIES OF WEALTH, ASPIRATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2012

Deborah James
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Considerable attempts to create a single economy of credit, in part through regularizing microlenders (especially the much-demonized loansharks or mashonisas), have been made by the South African government, notably through the National Credit Act. This article explores how borrowing and indebtedness are seen from the point of view of consumers and of those who aim to protect them. It suggests that we should speak of moneylending rather than moneylenders; that lending is often done by groups rather than by individuals (in a variant of the well-known stokvel); and that it may represent a response to so-called ‘formalization’ (Guyer 2004) of financial arrangements by those who have considerable experience of this, rather than being a bulwark against it. Based on research in Gauteng and Mpumalanga, the article critically explores prevalent stereotypes of the ‘overindebted consumer’ and the ‘black diamond’, seeking evidence both in support and in refutation of them. It discusses those factors which are conducive to and those which obstruct the achieving of the status of upwardly mobile – and simultaneously overindebted – person; demonstrates that aspiration and upward mobility, and the problems of credit or debt that accompany these, have much longer histories; and that these matters can give us insights into the contradictory character of the South African state. Its ‘neo-liberal’ dimension allows and encourages free engagement with the market and advocates the freedom to spend, even to become excessively acquisitive of material wealth. But it simultaneously attempts to regulate this in the interests of those unable to participate in this dream of conspicuous consumption. Informalization intensifies as all manner of means are devised to tap into state resources. Neo-liberal means are used to ensure the wide spread of redistribution.

Résumé

Le gouvernement sud-africain a tenté à de nombreuses reprises de créer une économie de crédit unique, à travers notamment la loi nationale sur le crédit (National Credit Act) et la régularisation des microprêteurs (notamment les tant diabolisés usuriers ou mashonisas). Cet article étudie le thème de l'emprunt et de l'endettement du point de vue des consommateurs et de ceux qui cherchent à les protéger. Il suggère que l'on devrait parler de prêt plutôt que de prêteurs, que le prêt est souvent le fait de groupes plutôt que de personnes (variante du bien connu stokvel) et qu'il peut représenter une réponse à la prétendue « formalisation » (Guyer 2004) du système financier de la part de ceux qui en ont une grande expérience, plutôt qu'un rempart. Basé sur des recherches menées dans le Gauteng et le Mpumalanga, l'article présente une étude critique des stéréotypes répandus du « consommateur surendetté » et du « diamant noir », en recherchant des éléments permettant de les justifier ou de les réfuter. Il traite des facteurs qui prédisposent une personne à accéder à l'ascension sociale (et dans le même temps à l'endettement) ou l'en empêchent ; il démontre que l'aspiration et l'ascension sociale, ainsi que les problèmes de crédit ou de dette qui les accompagnent, remontent à bien plus longtemps ; enfin, il affirme que ces éléments peuvent nous apporter des éclairages sur le caractère contradictoire de l’État sud-africain. Sa dimension « néolibérale » permet et encourage à participer librement au marché et prône la liberté de dépenser, voire de devenir excessivement attaché à la richesse matérielle. Or, dans le même temps, il tente de réguler cet aspect dans l'intérêt de ceux qui ne peuvent pas participer au rêve de posséder des signes extérieurs de richesse. L'informalisation s'intensifie alors que l'on imagine toutes sortes de moyens pour exploiter les ressources de l’État. Une large redistribution est assurée à l'aide de moyens néolibéraux.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 82 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Popular Economies in South Africa , February 2012 , pp. 20 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ardener, S. (2010) ‘Microcredit, money transfers, women and the Cameroon diaspora’, Afrika Focus 23 (2): 11–24.Google Scholar
Bähre, E. (2007) Money and Violence: financial self-help groups in a South African township. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bähre, E. (2011) ‘Liberation and redistribution: social grants, commercial insurance, and religious riches in South Africa’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 53 (2): 371–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M. and Parry, J. (1989) ‘Introduction: money and the morality of exchange’ in Parry, J. and Bloch, M. (eds), Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, K. (2010) ‘The world's first biometric money: Ghana's E-Zwich and the contemporary influence of South African biometrics’, Africa 80 (4): 642–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, R. (2004) ‘Financial intermediation, regulation and the formal microcredit sector in South Africa’, Development Southern Africa 21 (5): 831–49.Google Scholar
Dent, G. R. and Nyembezi, C. L. S. (1969) Scholar's Zulu Dictionary. Cape Town: Shuter and Shooter.Google Scholar
du Plessis, M. A. (2007) ‘The National Credit Act: debt counselling may prove to be a risky enterprise’, Journal for Juridical Science 32 (2): 76–94.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (2007) ‘Formalities of poverty: thinking about social assistance in neoliberal South Africa’, African Studies Review 50 (2): 71–86.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (2009) ‘The uses of neoliberalism’, Antipode 41 (s1): 166–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. (2010) ‘Declarations of dependence: labour, personhood and welfare’, paper presented at Anthropology Department Seminar, LSE, London.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. (2008) The Ascent of Money. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
GTZ (2008) The Incidence of and the Undesirable Practices Relating to Garnishee Orders in South Africa. Pretoria: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit.Google Scholar
Guerin, I., Morvant-Roux, S. and Servet, J.-M. (2010) ‘Understanding the diversity and complexity of demand for microfinance services: lessons from informal finance’ in Armendariz, B. and Labie, M. (eds), The Handbook of Microfinance. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Guyer, J. I. (1993) ‘Wealth in people and self-realization in equatorial Africa’, Man (New Series) 28 (2): 243–65.Google Scholar
Guyer, J. I. (2004) Marginal Gains: monetary transactions in Atlantic Africa. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, J. I. and Stiansen, E. (eds) (1999) Credit, Currencies and Culture: African financial institutions in historical perspective. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
Hart, K. (2000) The Memory Bank: money in an unequal world. London: Texere.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1994) Age of Extremes: the short twentieth century, 1914–1991. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
James, D. (2011) ‘The return of the broker: consensus, hierarchy, and choice in South African land reform’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (New Series) 17 (2): 318–38.Google Scholar
Krige, D. (2009) ‘Black diamonds are not forever: neo-liberal explanations of social change and the South African “black middle class” ', paper presented at Third AEGIS European Conference on African Studies, Leipzig, June.Google Scholar
Krige, D. (2011) ‘Power, Identity and Agency at Work in the Popular Economies of Soweto and Black Johannesburg’. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, available online at <http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/10143>..>Google Scholar
Krige, E. J. and Krige, J. D. (1943) The Realm of a Rain Queen. London: International African Institute and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosotho, M. (1998) The Tikieline Yuppie. Johannesburg: Vivlia.Google Scholar
Niehaus, I. (2001) Witchcraft, Power and Politics: exploring the occult in the South African Lowveld. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Porteous, D. and Hazelhurst, E. (2004) Banking on Change: democratising finance in South Africa, 1994–2004 and beyond. Cape Town: Double Storey Books.Google Scholar
Posel, D. (2010) ‘Races to consume: revisiting South Africa's history of race, consumption and the struggle for freedom’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 23 (2): 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitman, J. (2003) ‘Unsanctioned wealth, or the productivity of debt in Northern Cameroon’, Public Culture 15 (2): 211–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, J. (2004) ‘Spoilt for Choice: financial services in an African township’. PhD thesis, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Schlemmer, L. (2005) ‘Lost in transformation? South Africa's emerging African middle class’, Occasional Paper 8, Centre for Development and Enterprise, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Seekings, J. and Nattrass, N. (2006) Class, Race and Inequality in South Africa. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shipton, P. (2007) The Nature of Entrustment: intimacy, exchange and the sacred in Africa. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shipton, P. (2009) Mortgaging the Ancestors: ideologies of attachment in Africa. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyongwana, P. (2004) ‘Informal moneylenders in the Limpopo, Gauteng and Eastern Cape provinces of South Africa’, Development Southern Africa 21 (5): 851–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar