Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:39:14.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Land Inalienable? Historical and Current Debates on Land Transfers in Northern Ghana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Carola Lentz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article traces the history of debates on land transfers in northern Ghana and discusses the ways in which African and European views on land tenure influenced and instrumentalized each other. Using the case of Nandom in the Upper West Region, I analyse how an expansionist group of Dagara farmers gained access to and legitimized control over land previously held by a group of Sisala hunters and farmers claiming to be the ‘first-comers’ to the area. Both groups acknowledge that the Sisala eventually transferred land to the Dagara immigrants, symbolically effected by the transmission of an earth-shrine stone. However, the Sisala interpret this historical event in terms of a ‘gift’, invoking the language of kinship and continued dependency, while the Dagara construe it in terms of a ‘purchase’, implicating exchange, equality and autonomy. These different perspectives, as well as colonial officials' ideas that land ownership was ultimately vested in the ancestors of the first-comer lineage and therefore ‘inalienable’, have shaped early disputes about the Nandom earth shrine and Dagara property rights. Competing conceptions of pre-colonial African land tenure continue to provide powerful arguments in current land conflicts, and shrinking land reserves as well as the political implications of landed property, in the context of decentralization policies, have exacerbated the debate on the ‘inalienability’ of land.

L'article retrace l'historique des débats sur les transferts de terres dans le Nord du Ghana et traite de la manière dont les perspectives africaines et européennes sur la question foncière se sont mutuellement influencées et instrumentalisées. À partir du cas de Nandom dans l'Upper West Region, l'article analyse la manière dont un groupe expansionniste d'agriculteurs dagara a obtenu l'accès et la légitimité du contrôle de terres ayant appartenu à un groupe de chasseurs et d'agriculteurs sisala revendiquant leur statut de « premiers arrivants » dans la région. Les deux groupes reconnaissent le transfert des terres par les Sisala aux immigrants dagara, transfert symboliquement effectué par la transmission d'une pierre de sanctuaire en terre. En revanche, les Sisala interprètent cet événement historique en termes de « cadeau », invoquant le langage de parenté et la dépendance continue, tandis que les Dagara l'interprètent en termes d'« achat », impliquant l'échange, l'égalité et l'autonomie. Ces perspectives divergentes, ainsi que les idées des officiels coloniaux selon lesquelles la propriété foncière revenait essentiellement aux ancêtres des premiers arrivants et était donc « inaliénable », ont façonné les premiers désaccords portant sur le sanctuaire en terre de Nandom et les droits fonciers des Dagara. Les conceptions divergentes du foncier africain précolonial continuent de fournir des arguments puissants dans les conflits de terres actuels ; de plus, l'amenuisement des réserves de terres et les implications politiques de la propriété foncière, dans le contexte des politiques de décentralisation, ont exacerbé le débat sur l'« inaliénabilité » de la terre.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Africa , Volume 80 , Special Issue 1: Interpreting Land Markets in Africa , February 2010 , pp. 56 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alhassan, et al. (1978) ‘Report by the Committee on Ownership of Lands and Position of Tenants in the Northern and Upper Regions’. Unpublished report, Accra.Google Scholar
Amanor, K. (2006) ‘Customary land, mobile labor and alienation in the Eastern Region of Ghana’ in Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (eds), Land and the Politics of Belonging in West Africa. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bachelet, M. (1982) ‘Titulaires de droits fonciers coutumiers’ in Encyclopédie Juridique de l'Afrique, Volume 5. Abidjan: Les nouvelles éditions africaines.Google Scholar
Bening, R. B. (1995) ‘Land policy and administration in northern Ghana’, Transactions of the Historical Society of Ghana 16: 227–66.Google Scholar
Berry, S. (2001) Chiefs Know Their Boundaries: essays on property, power and the past in Asante, 1896–1996. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
Biebuyck, D. (ed.) (1963) African Agrarian Systems. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blum, C. (1995) ‘Of women and land: legitimizing husbandry’ in Brewer, J. and Staves, S. (eds), Early Modern Conceptions of Property. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bohannan, P. (1963) ‘“Land”, “tenure” and “land-tenure”’ in Biebuyck, D. (ed.), African Agrarian Systems. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boni, S. (2006) ‘Indigenous blood and foreign labor: the ancestralization of land rights in Sefwi (Ghana)’ in Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (eds), Land and the Politics of Belonging in West Africa. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cardinall, A. W. (1920) The Natives of the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanock, M. (1985) Law, Custom and Social Order: the colonial experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chanock, M. (1991) ‘Paradigms, policies and property: a review of the customary law of land tenure’ in Mann, K. and Roberts, R. (eds), Law in Colonial Africa. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. (2000) ‘Question foncière et construction national en Côte d'Ivoire’, Politique Africaine 78: 94–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. (2006) ‘How does an institution evolve? Land, politics, intergenerational relations and the institution of the tutorat amongst autochthones and immigrants (Gban region, Côte d'Ivoire)’ in Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (eds), Land and the Politics of Belonging in West Africa. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. and Bobo, K. S. (2003) ‘La situation de guerre dans l'arène villageoise: un exemple dans le Centre-Ouest ivoirien’, Politique Africaine 89: 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colson, E. (1971) ‘The impact of the colonial period on the definition of land rights’ in Turner, V. (ed.), Colonialism in Africa, 1870–1960, Volume 3, Profiles of Change: African society and colonial rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Der, B. (1975) ‘Colonial land policy in the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast, 1900–1957’, Universitas 4: 127–42.Google Scholar
Droz, Y. (1999) Migrations kikuyus. Des pratiques sociales à l'imaginaire. Neuchâtel: Editions de l'Institut d'ethnologie.Google Scholar
Eyre-Smith, R. (1933) A Brief Review of the History and Social Organisation of the Peoples of the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast. Accra: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Firmin-Sellers, K. (1996) The Transformation of Property Rights in the Gold Coast. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. (1956) The Social Organisation of the LoWiili. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (1957) ‘Fields of social control among the LoDagaba’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 87: 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, S. (2002) Writing and Colonialism in Northern Ghana: the encounter between the LoDagaa and ‘the world on paper’. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hébert, P. J. (1976) Esquisse d'une monographie historique du pays Dagara. Par un groupe de Dagara en collaboration avec le père Hébert. Diébougou: Diocèse de Diébougou.Google Scholar
Jacob, J.-P. (2002) La tradition du pluralisme institutionnel dans les conflits fonciers entre autochtones. Le cas du Gwendégué (Centre Burkina Faso). Document de travail de l'Unité de Recherche 095 Nr. 3, Montpellier, IRD/GRET.Google Scholar
Jacob, J.-P. (2003) ‘Imposer son tutorat foncier: usages autochtones de l'immigration et tradition pluraliste dans le Gwendégué (centre-ouest Burkina)’ in Kuba, R., Lentz, C. and Somda, C. N. (eds), Histoire du peuplement et relations interethniques au Burkina Faso. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Kasanga, K. (1995) ‘Land tenure and regional investment prospects: the case of the tenurial systems of northern Ghana’, Property Management 13: 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimble, D. (1963) A Political History of Ghana. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, (ed.) (1996) ‘Decentralisation, land tenure and land administration in the Northern Region of Ghana’, seminar report, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Accra.Google Scholar
Kouassigan, G. A. (1982) ‘La nature juridique des droits fonciers coutumiers’ in Encyclopédie Juridique de l'Afrique, Volume 5. Abidjan: Les nouvelles éditions africaines.Google Scholar
Kuba, R. (2003) ‘Comment devenir Pougouli? Stratégies d'inclusion au sudouest du Burkina Faso’ in Kuba, R., Lentz, C. and Somda, C. N. (eds), Histoire du peuplement et relations interethniques au Burkina Faso. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (2002) ‘Arrows and earth shrines: towards a history of Dagara expansion in southern Burkina Faso’, Journal of African History 43: 377–406.Google Scholar
Kuba, R., Lentz, C. and Werthmann, K. (eds) (2001) ‘Les Dagara et leurs voisins: histoire de peuplement et relations interethniques au sud-ouest du Burkina Faso’, Sonderforschungsbereich 268, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Kuba, R., A. Reikat, A. Wenzek and K. Werthmann (2004) ‘Erdherren und Einwanderer: Bodenrecht in Burkina Faso’ in Albert, K.-D. et al. (eds), Mensch und Natur in Westafrika: Ergebnisse aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich 268. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
Kunbuor, B. (2000) ‘“Traditional” and state law in land conflicts: case studies from the Upper West Region of Ghana’, Working Papers on African Societies 43 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Kunbuor, B. (2003) ‘Multiple layers of land rights and multiple owners: the case of land disputes in the Upper West Region of Ghana’ in Kröger, F. and Meier, B. (eds), Ghana's North: research on culture, religion and politics in northern Ghanaian societies. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lentz, C. (2000) ‘Of hunters, goats and earth-shrines: settlement histories and the politics of oral tradition in northern Ghana’, History in Africa 27: 193–214.Google Scholar
Lentz, C. (2001) ‘Ouessa: débats sur l'histoire du peuplement’ in Kuba, R., Lentz, C. and Werthmann, K. (eds), ‘Les Dagara et leurs voisins: histoire de peuplement et relations interethniques au sud-ouest du Burkina Faso’, Sonderforschungsbereich 268, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Lentz, C. (2003) ‘“Premiers arrivés” et “nouveaux-venus”: discours sur l'autochtonie dans la savane ouest-africaine’ in Kuba, R., Lentz, C. and Somda, C. N. (eds), Histoire du peuplement et relations interethniques au Burkina Faso. Paris, Karthala.Google Scholar
Lentz, C. (2006a) Ethnicity and theMaking of History in Northern Ghana. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lentz, C. (2006b) ‘Land rights and the politics of belonging in Africa: an introduction’ in Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (eds), Land and the Politics of Belonging in West Africa. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lentz, C. (2006c) ‘First-comers and late-comers: indigenous theories of land ownership in the West African savanna’ in Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (eds), Land and the Politics of Belonging in West Africa. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lentz, C. (2009) ‘Constructing ritual protection on an expanding settlement frontier: earth shrines in the Black Volta region’ in Dawson, A. C. (ed.), Shrines in Africa: history, politics, and society. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Lentz, C. and Sturm, H.-J. (2001) ‘Of trees and earth shrines: an interdisciplinary approach to settlement histories in the West African savannah’, History in Africa 28: 139–68.Google Scholar
Le Roy, É. (1982) ‘Caractères des droits fonciers coutumiers’ in Encyclopédie Juridique de l'Afrique, Volume 5. Abidjan: Les nouvelles éditions africaines.Google Scholar
Lévy, J.-P. (1972) Histoire de la propriété. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lund, C. (2006) ‘Who owns Bolgatanga? A story of inconclusive encounters’ in Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (eds), Land and the Politics of Belonging in West Africa. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lund, C. (2008) Local Politics and the Dynamics of Property in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninsin, K. (1989) ‘The land question since the 1950s’ in Hansen, E., , E. and Ninsin, K. (eds), The State: development and politics in Ghana. London: Codesria Book Series.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (1989) The Enigma of Colonialism: British policy in West Africa. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Pogucki, R. J. H. (1951) ‘Report on Land Tenure in Native Customary Law of the Protectorate of the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast’, Part II. Accra: Lands Department.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M. (1994) Property and Persuasion: essays on the history, theory and rhetoric of ownership. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tengan, E. (1991) The Land as Being and Cosmos: the institution of the earth cult among the Sisala of north-western Ghana. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Woodman, G. R. (1996) Customary Land Law in the Ghanaian Courts. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar
Zwernemann, J. (1968) Die Erde in Vorstellungswelt und Kulturpraktiken der Sudanischen Völker. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar