Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:09:51.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forever Gained:1 Resettlement and Land Policy in the Context of National Development in Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

B. H. Kinsey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In September 1980 the Government of Zimbabwe embarked upon a programme of agricultural resettlement which is modest in terms of the extent of the problems which it seeks to mitigate, but ambitious in terms of the capacity of a new administration to implement it. The target rates of resettlement designed into the original programme have subsequently been multiplied some ninefold by the addition of a second, parallel programme, which makes resettlement now and in the foreseeable future the major rural development activity in Zimbabwe; indeed, it is currently the only sustained public sector programme with the potential to affect fairly immediately and significantly the economic welfare of large numbers of rural dwellers.

Résumé

Acquise à jamais: Repeuplement et Politique d'Allocation de la Terre dans le contexte du développement national au Zimbabwe

En 1980, le Zimbabwe s'est embarque dans d'ambitieux programmes visant à réinstaller avant 1985 quelque 170,000 families des régions surpeuplées communales (préalablement ‘Tribal Trust Lands’) sur la terre acquise des fermiers européens. Les programmes demandent beaucoup en termes de personnel et de ressources, et la réinstallation de la population est virtuellement la seule activite de développement rural national opérant en 1982. Ces programmes semblent être motivés par une forte croyance que la terre est le problème central à résoudre dans un Zimbabwe indépendant. Des plans d'installation sont à l'heure actuelle en train d'être élaborés et mis en oeuvre sous une pression de temps considérable et avec une étroite insistance sur les aspects techniques à courts termes plutôt que sur les problèmes économiques et sociaux à longs termes. A vrai dire, beaucoup du contenu et du mode d'implantation des programmes existants semble inconsistant par rapport aux buts à longs termes du gouvernement. Si, toutefois, les nombres d'immigrants et d'hectares de terre sont la seule mesure de performance, les accomplissements dans une très courte période sont indéniables. Ce qui demeure cependant en doute est si le repeuplement dans sa forme existante est un instrument politique largement effectif pour atteindre les buts de croissance et d'équité du gouvernement. Car, bien que la réinstallation ait crée une période de grâce, celle ci ne sera que de courte durée; dans les cinq années seulement qui verront l'achèvement du programme projeté, l'arithmétique de la croissance de la population augmentera le nombre des habitants dans les régions communales au-dessus des niveaux de crise de 1980. Le Gouvernement doit encore confronter le challenge beaucoup plus ingrat d'accomplir une transformation agraire dans les régions communales, où il sera difficile d'échapper à la conclusion que le problème central à résoudre n'est pas la terre mais la population.

Type
Past and Present in Zimbabwe
Information
Africa , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 1982 , pp. 92 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brand, C. M. 1981. ‘Land tenure and land hunger in two Zimbabwean peasant communities’. Paper presented to the Zimbabwe Economic Society Conference on Planning Rural Development in Zimbabwe in the 1980s. Salisbury, 8–10 June 1981. (Cited with permission.)Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael. 1979. ‘Settler state, guerrilla war, and rural underdevelopment in Rhodesia’ Rural Africana 4–5: 115–29.Google Scholar
Cheater, A. P. 1982. ‘Formal and informal rights to land in Zimbabwe's black freehold areas’ Africa 52(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commercial Farmers Union 1982. ‘Potential for growth in agriculture’. Salisbury (mimeo).Google Scholar
Cross, E. G. 1981. ‘Zimbabwe: strategy for economic development. Agriculture: development and equity’. Salisbury: Conex Training Branch Forum (mimeo).Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1981a. Annual Economic Review of Zimbabwe. Salisbury: Ministry of Economic Planning and Development.Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1981b. Growth with Equity: An Economic Policy Statement. Salisbury: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1981c. Resettlement Programme: Policies and Procedures. Salisbury: Ministry of Lands, Resettlement and Rural Development.Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1981d. Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Incomes, Prices and Conditions of Service. Salisbury: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1981e. ‘Zimbabwe intensive resettlement: standardised farm management report’. Salisbury: Agricultural and Rural Development Authority (mimeo).Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1982a. ‘Intensive resettlement programme March 1982’. Salisbury: Department of Agricultural Technical and Extension Services (mimeo).Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1982b. ‘Nyamusizi resettlement scheme’. Salisbury: Ministry of Lands, Resettlement and Rural Development (manuscript).Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1982c. ‘The Sengezi resettlement scheme’. Salisbury: Ministry of Lands, Resettlement and Rural Development (manuscript).Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe 1982d. ‘Soti Source background information’. Salisbury: Ministry of Lands, Resettlement and Rural Development (manuscript).Google Scholar
Harbeson, John W. 1981. ‘Land and rural development in independent Zimbabwe: a preliminary assessment’. Washington: Office of Rural Development and Development Administration, U.S. Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Hazlewood, Arthur. 1979. The Economy of Kenya: the Kenyatta Era. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
The Herald. Salisbury (various dates).Google Scholar
Hume, I. M. 1978. ‘A preliminary essay on land reform in Zimbabwe/Rhodesia’. Salisbury: Whitsun Foundation (mimeo).Google Scholar
Kinsey, B. H. (ed.) 1980. Zimbabwe: Food and Agriculture Sector, Country Development Brief.. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. A. 1958. ‘Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour’, in Agarwala, A. and Singh, S. (eds.) The Economics of Underdevelopment. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muir, K. A., Blackie, M. J., Kinsey, B. H. and de Swardt, M. L. A. 1982. ‘The employment effects of 1980 wage and price policy in the Zimbabwe maize and tobacco industries’. African Affairs: January.Google Scholar
Munslow, Barry and Cliffe, Lionel 1980. ‘The prospects for Zimbabwe’, Review of African Political Economy 18 (May–August): 1–6.Google Scholar
Mupawose, R. M, and Chengu, E. T. 1982. ‘Determination of land policy in Zimbabwe’. Paper presented at the Workshop on Land Policy and Agricultural Production. Gaberone, Botswana, 14–20 February 1982.Google Scholar
Riddell, Roger, n.d. The Land Question. London: Catholic Institute for International Relations.Google Scholar
Riddell, Roger, 1978. The Land Problem in Rhodesia: Alternatives for the Future. Mambo Socioeconomic Series No. 11. London: Catholic Institute for International Relations, and Gwelo: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
Riddell, Roger, 1979. ‘Prospects for land reform in Zimbabwe’, Rural Africana 4–5: 17–31.Google Scholar
Riddell, Roger, 1980. ‘Zimbabwe's land problem: the central issue’, in Morris-Jones, W. H. (ed.) From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe: Behind and Beyond Lancaster House. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Samkange, Stanlake 1978. Year of the Uprising. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Stoneman, Colin. 1981. ‘Agriculture’, in Colin, Stoneman (ed.) Zimbabwe's Inheritance. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
The Sunday Times. London, 13 September 1981.Google Scholar
‘Yates, Peter’. 1980. ‘The prospects for socialist transition in Zimbabwe’, Review of African Political Economy 18 (May-August): 68–88Google Scholar