Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:49:43.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EVERYDAY POLITICS AND COLLECTIVE MOBILIZATION AGAINST FOREIGNERS IN A SOUTH AFRICAN SHACK SETTLEMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract

In contrast to the tolerant and largely peaceful ‘living politics' of informal settlements, as embodied by the social movement Abahlali baseMjondolo, this article considers a darker side of squatter politics: ‘xenophobic’ mobilization. I show how the historical stratification of citizenship in South Africa remains spatially embedded in longstanding informal settlements, where distinctive repertoires of collective action have been shaped by a (still unfinished) history of struggle for inclusion. Using archival research and interviews conducted in the informal settlements of Atteridgeville, Gauteng, I show how the continuing struggle for equal citizenship draws on shared experiences of mundane hardship and collective labour, giving rise to social distance between established local squatters and politically indifferent foreign newcomers. At times of protest, this polarity is concentrated by and converges with familiar practices of insurgent citizenship, creating a context for mobilization against foreigners. In this sense, ‘xenophobic’ mobilization may be seen to articulate a claim for inclusion by structurally excluded ‘citizens', rather than an exclusionary claim by those who already belong. The article provides a useful counterpoint to readings of ‘xenophobic’ violence that focus on the role of elite discourses, instrumental leaders or crude racial identities in shaping such mobilization.

Résumé

La littérature actuelle sur les habitants des baraques (shacks) « politique de vie » insiste sur une politique pacifique et ouverte des zones informelles qu'incarne un mouvement social comme Abahlali baseMjondolo. Cet article informe plutôt la dimension exclusive des mobilisations « xenophobes » de la politique des squatters. Il montre comment la stratification historique de la citoyenneté en Afrique du Sud s'enracine dans des zones informelles anciennes au sein desquelles des répertoires distinctifs d'action collective ont été façonnés par une histoire (inachevée) de lutte pour l'inclusion. S'appuyant sur des archives et des entretiens menés dans les zones informelles d'Atteridgeville, dans le Gauteng, l'article montre comment la lutte pour une citoyenneté égale se nourrit d'expériences partagées de difficulté du quotidien et de participation à l'action collective, provoquant une distance sociale entre les squatters locaux engagés dans la lutte politique et les nouveaux venus étrangers qui y sont indifférents. Il explore les contestations collectives, au cours desquelles ces subjectivités se polarisent, créant un contexte favorable à la mobilisation contre les étrangers. Dans ce sens, on peut voir la mobilisation « xenophobe » comme l'articulation d'une revendication d'inclusion par des « citoyens » structurellement exclus, plutôt que d'une revendication d'exclusion par ceux qui se sentent déjà appartenir. L'article offre un contrepoint utile aux lectures de la violence « xenophobe » qui se concentrent sur le rôle des discours des élites, des dirigeants clés ou des identités raciales sommaires dans la fabrique de cette mobilisation.

Type
The politics of exclusion and inclusion in Africa
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Africa Research Bulletin (2011) ‘South Africa – Zimbabwe: xenophobic violence resurfaces’, Africa Research Bulletin: Political, Social and Cultural Series 48 (10): 9008.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. (2001) ‘Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics’, Environment and Urbanization 13 (2): 2343.Google Scholar
Arrighi, G., Aschoff, N. and Scully, B. (2010) ‘Accumulation by dispossession and its limits: the Southern Africa paradigm revisited’, Studies in Comparative International Development 45 (4): 410–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, A. (1995) ‘Why local riots are not simply local: collective violence and the state in Bijnor, India 1988–1993’, Theory and Society 24: 3578.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (2007) ‘Critique of violence’ in Lawrence, B. B. and Karim, A. (eds), On Violence: a reader. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bøås, M. (2009) ‘“New” nationalism and autochthony – tales of origin as political cleavage’, Africa Spectrum 44 (1): 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, P. (1990) ‘The politics of black squatter movements on the Rand, 1944–1952’, Radical History Review 4647: 89115.Google Scholar
Booth, D. and Biyela, M. (1988) ‘Exploring the spatial dimensions of black resistance and political violence in South Africa: the case of Durban’, Urban Geography 9 (6): 629–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chance, K. R. (2011) ‘Living politics: practices and protests of “the poor” in democratic South Africa’. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Chauke, G. (2008) ‘Residents protest against planned relocation’, Tshwane Sun Atteridgeville, March.Google Scholar
Commey, P. (2013) ‘Xenophobia: South Africa's lingering timebomb’, New African 530: 1619.Google Scholar
Dunn, K. (2009) ‘“Sons of the soil” and contemporary state making: autochthony, uncertainty and political violence in Africa’, Third World Quarterly 30 (1): 113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidelberg, P. (1997) ‘South African apartheid: the homeland–township nexus, 1948–1986’, South African Historical Journal 36 (1): 88112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, N. and Scotson, J. L. (1965) The Established and the Outsiders: a sociological enquiry into community problems. London: Frank Cass & Co.Google Scholar
Espeland, R. H. (2011) ‘Autochthony, rumor dynamics, and communal violence in Western Uganda’, Social Analysis 55 (3): 1834.Google Scholar
Fauvelle-Aymar, C. and Kabwe-Segatti, A. Wa (2012) ‘People, space and politics: an exploration of factors explaining the 2008 anti-foreigner violence in South Africa’ in Landau, L. B. (ed.), Exorcising the Demons Within: xenophobia, violence and statecraft in contemporary South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Fourie, C. (1995) ‘Atteridgeville kort minstens 10 000 huise, lui verslag’, Beeld, 31 March.Google Scholar
Geffen, N. (2008) ‘Shattered myths: the xenophobic violence in South Africa’, Treatment Action Campaign website, 16 June, <http://www.tac.org.za/community/node/2350>..>Google Scholar
Gelderblom, D. and Kok, P. (1994) Urbanisation: South Africa's challenge. Volume 1: Dynamics. Pretoria: HSRC.Google Scholar
Geschiere, P. (2009) The Perils of Belonging: autochthony, citizenship, and exclusion in Africa and Europe. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, N. C. (2008) ‘Upright and free: Fanon in South Africa, from Biko to the shackdwellers’ movement (Abahlali baseMjondolo)’, Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture 14 (6): 683715.Google Scholar
Gqola, P. (2008) ‘Brutal inheritances: echoes, negrophobia and masculinist violence’ in Hassim, S., Kupe, T. and Worby, E. (eds), Go Home or Die Here: violence, xenophobia and the reinvention of difference in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Harms, E. (2013) ‘Eviction time in the New Saigon: temporalities of displacement in the rubble of development’, Cultural Anthropology 28 (2): 344–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayem, J. (2013) ‘From May 2008 to 2011: xenophobic violence and national subjectivity in South Africa’, Journal of Southern African Studies 39 (1): 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogenstijn, M., Van Middelkoop, D. and Terlouw, K. (2008) ‘The established, the outsiders and scale strategies: studying local power conflicts’, Sociological Review 56 (1): 144–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holston, J. (2008) Insurgent Citizenship: disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holston, J. (2009) ‘Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries’, City and Society 21 (2): 245–67.Google Scholar
Huchzermeyer, M. (2003) ‘A legacy of control? The capital subsidy for housing, and informal settlement intervention in South Africa’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (3): 591612.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, S. N. (2009) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, P. and Durrheim, K. (2013) ‘The dilemma of anti-xenophobia discourse in the aftermath of violence in De Doorns’, Journal of Southern African Studies 39 (3): 577–96.Google Scholar
Leadership (2013) ‘Consulate condemns xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in SA’, Leadership, 30 May, <http://www.safpi.org/news/article/2013/consulate-condemns-xenophobic-attacks-nigerians-sa>..>Google Scholar
Makhulu, A.-M. (2010) ‘The “dialectics of toil”: reflections on the politics of space after apartheid’, Anthropological Quarterly 83 (3): 551–80.Google Scholar
Mamdani, M. (2001) When Victims Become Killers: colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall-Fratani, R. (2006) ‘The war of “who is who”: autochthony, nationalism, and citizenship in the Ivoirian crisis’, African Studies Review 49 (2): 943.Google Scholar
Matsinhe, D. M. (2009) ‘Cleaning the nation: anti-African patriotism and xenophobia in South Africa’. DPhil thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Matsinhe, D. M. (2012) ‘Africa's fear of itself: the ideology of makwerekwere in South Africa’, Third World Quarterly 32 (2): 295313.Google Scholar
Maylam, P. (1995) ‘Explaining the apartheid city: 20 years of South African urban historiography’, Journal of Southern African Studies 21 (1): 1938.Google Scholar
Misago, J.-P. (2012) ‘Disorder in a changing society: authority and the micro-politics of violence’ in Landau, L. B. (ed.), Exorcising the Demons Within: xenophobia, violence and statecraft in contemporary South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Misago, J.-P., Landau, L. B. and Monson, T. (2009) Towards Tolerance, Law, and Dignity: addressing violence against foreign nationals in South Africa. Johannesburg: International Organization for Migration (IOM).Google Scholar
Mngxitama, A. (2008) ‘We are not all like that: race, class and nation after apartheid’ in Hassim, S., Kupe, T. and Worby, E. (eds), Go Home or Die Here: violence, xenophobia and the reinvention of difference in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Monson, T. (2012) ‘Making the law; breaking the law; taking the law into our own hands: sovereignty and territorial control in three South African settlements’ in Landau, L. B. (ed.), Exorcising the Demons Within: xenophobia, violence and statecraft in contemporary South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Mosselson, A. (2010) ‘“There is no difference between citizens and non-citizens anymore”: violent xenophobia, citizenship and the politics of belonging in post-apartheid South Africa’, Journal of Southern African Studies 36 (3): 642–55.Google Scholar
Neocosmos, M. (2008) ‘The politics of fear and the fear of politics: reflections on xenophobic violence in South Africa’, Journal of Asian and African Studies 43 (6): 586–94.Google Scholar
Nieftagodien, N. (ed.) (2011) Xenophobia's Local Genesis: historical constructions of insiders and the politics of exclusion in Alexandra township. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Pithouse, R. (2008) ‘A politics of the poor: shack dwellers’ struggles in Durban’, Journal of Asian and African Studies 43 (1): 6394.Google Scholar
Platzky, L. and Walker, C. (1985) The Surplus People: forced removals in South Africa. Cape Town: Galvin and Sales.Google Scholar
Posel, D. (1991) The Making of Apartheid 1948–1961: conflict and compromise. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Roy, A. (2009) ‘Strangely familiar: planning and the worlds of insurgence and informality’, Planning Theory 8 (7): 711.Google Scholar
Selmeczi, A. (2012) ‘Abahlali's vocal politics of proximity: speaking, suffering and political subjectivization’, Journal of Asian and African Studies 47 (5): 498515.Google Scholar
Stadler, A. W. (1979) ‘Birds in the cornfield: squatter movements in Johannesburg, 1944–1947’, Journal of Southern African Studies 6 (1): 93123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tafira, K. (2011) ‘Is xenophobia racism?’, Anthropology Southern Africa 34 (3&4): 114–21.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2008) ‘Xenophobic attacks drive hundreds from homes in South African suburb’, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) website, 28 March, <http://www.unhcr.org/47ecf41c4.html>..>Google Scholar
UNHCR (2012) UNHCR Global Trends 2012 – displacement: the new 20th century challenge. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).Google Scholar
Von Holdt, K. (2013) ‘The violence of order, orders of violence: between Fanon and Bourdieu’, Current Sociology 61 (2): 112–31.Google Scholar
Von Holdt, K., Langa, M., Molapo, S., Mogapi, N., Ngubeni, K., Dlamini, J. and Kirsten, A. (2011) The Smoke that Calls: insurgent citizenship, collective violence and the struggle for a place in the new South Africa. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR), University of the Witwatersrand, Society Work and Development Institute (SWOP).Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2002) ‘Politics as a vocation’ in Besteman, C. (ed.), Violence: a reader. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zikode, S. B. (2006) ‘The third force’, Journal of Asian and African Studies 41 (1/2): 185–9.Google Scholar