Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:28:16.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnicity and Fertility: Implications for Population Programs in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2012

Remi Clignet  and
Joyce A. Sween
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Whether public policies concerning family planning involve legislative or educational programs, their impact depends upon an analysis of patterns of family formation. But to merely identify the direction and the magnitude of overall aggregate trends in this regard is insufficient. While programs of family planning aim at satisfying the requirements of a national and hence uniform policy, their success depends upon a problematic lack of variability in the relevant behaviours across the various social and ethnic groups located within a particular nation. Accordingly the thrust of the present paper is not only to identify the determinants of child-bearing activities, but also to assess the variability of these determinants along ethnic lines.

Résumé

L'ETHNICITÉ ET LA FERTILITÉ: CONSÉQUENCES POUR LA PLANIFICATION DÉMOGRAPHIQUE EN AFRIQUE

Le présent article cherche à démontrer que si les variations de fécondité reflètent l'importance relative attachée à la quantité et à la qualité des enfants souhaités par les femmes et leurs conjoints, cette importance n'est pas définie de la même manière au sein de divers groupes ethniques africains. Portant sur le recensement de l'Ouest Cameroun (1964), l'analyse soulignel'importance des variations inter-ethniques tant dans la moyenne que dans la variance de la distribution des fécondités totales et courantes des femmes de la classe d'âge 21–25 ans, originaires de divers groupes ethniques de l'Ouest Cameroun. De plus, il existe des variations inter-ethniques significatives dans le pourcentage des variances expliquées comme dans la nature et l'importance des variables individuelles et contextuelles contribuant aux équations correspondantes. Dans la mesure où ces contrastes peuvent être expliqués aussi bien en termes de différences réelles d'attitudes et de comportements qu'en termes de biais ethnocentriques présents dans tout recensement, l'analyse débouche sur deux conclusions distinctes. D'une part, une politique nationale de planning familial n'est possible qu'au terme d'une politique sociale et économique d'intégration des divers groupes ethniques locaux. D'autre part, une analyse de la fécondité en milieu africain demande une identification plus précise des éléments culturellement spécifiques entrant dans la définition de la 'quantite’ et de la ‘qualité’ des enfants souhaités par les individus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 1978 , pp. 47 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, Janet 1969 ‘Testing the theory of social area analysis: the ecology of Cairo, Egypt,’ American Sociological Review 34: 198–211.Google Scholar
Ardener, Edwin 1955 Coastal Bantu of the Cameroun.London:International African Institute.Google Scholar
Ardener, Edwin 1969 La Population du Cameroun Occidental (Vol. 1, Definition of ethnic groups).Paris: Ministère de la Coopération.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary 1960 ‘An economic analysis of fertility,’ in Demographic and Economic Change in Developing Countries. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Rae and Winch, R. 1972 ‘Societal complexity and familial complexity,’American Journal of Sociology 77: 898–920.Google Scholar
Boudon, Raymond 1974 Education Opportunity and Social Inequality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brass, William and Coale, A. 1968 ‘Methods of analysis and estimation,’ in Brass, W.(ed.) The Demography of Tropical Africa. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald and Fiske, D. 1959 ‘Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait multimethod matrix,’ Psychological Bulletin 55: 81–105.Google Scholar
Chilver, Edwin and Kaberry, P. M. 1967 Traditional Bamenda Precolonial History and Ethnography of the Bamenda Grassfields. Buea: Ministry of Primary Education and Social Welfare.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron 1974 Theory and Method in a Study of Argentine Fertility. New York:Wiley.Google Scholar
Clignet, Remi 1974 Liberty and Equality in the Educational Process. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clignet, Remi 1975 ‘Distributions et fonctions de la polygamie en milieu Africain,’ Psychopathologie Africaine 11: 157–77.Google Scholar
Clignet, Remi and Sween, Joyce 1969 ‘Social change and type of marriage,’ American Journal of Sociology 75:123–45.Google Scholar
Clignet, Remi and Sween, 1974 ‘Urbanization, plural marriage and family size,’ The American Ethnologist 1: 221–41.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack 1971 ‘Class and marriage in Africa and Eurasia,’ American Journal of Sociology 76: 585–603.Google Scholar
Habbakuk, Henri 1955 ‘Family structure and economic change in XIXth century Europe,’ Journal of Economic History 15: 1–13.Google Scholar
Hurault, Jean 1962 La structure sociale des Bamileke. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kofele Kale, Ndeva 1974 The political culture of anglophone Cameroun. Evanston: Northwestern University unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Legesse, A. 1975 Ecological stress and pastoralism in Africa. Evanston: Northwestern University, mimeo.Google Scholar
Lesthaege, R. and Page, H. J. 1976 Relating individual fertility to other variables: common problems and pitfalls. Paper read at the XVth International Seminar on Family Research.Google Scholar
Murdock, George Peter 1957 ‘World ethnographic sample’,American Anthropologist 20: 664–87.Google Scholar
Nag, Moni 1962 Factors Affecting Human Fertility in Non-industrial Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Namboodiri, N. Krishnan 1972 ‘Some observations of the economic framework for fertility analysis,’ Population Studies 26: 185–206.Google Scholar
Nimkoff, Morris and Middleton, H. 1960 ‘Types of family and types of economy,’ American Journal of Sociology 66: 215–25.Google Scholar
Osmond, Mary 1965 ‘Correlates of type of marriage,’ Social Forces 44: 8–16.Google Scholar
Paden, John 1975 ‘Dimensions of national integration in Africa,’ in Abu-Lughod, I. (ed.) African Themes. Evanston: Northwestern University Program of African Studies. 175–93.Google Scholar
Ritzenthaler, Robert and Ritzenthaler, F. 1962 Cameroon Villages: An Ethnography of the Befut. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Public Museum Publications in Ethnography.Google Scholar
Robinson, Warren and Horlacher, D. E. 1971 ‘Population growth and economic welfare,’ Reports on Population/Family Planning 6: 1–39.Google Scholar
Schnaiberg, Allan and Goldenberg, S. 1974 Closing the circle–the impact of children on parental status. Evanston: Northwestern University, mimeo.Google Scholar
Schnaiberg, Allan and Reed, D. 1975 ‘Risk uncertainty and family formation: the social context of poverty groups,’ Population Studies 28: 513–33.Google Scholar
Schultz, Theodore 1973 ‘The value of children: an economic perspective,’ Supplement to the Journal of Political Economy 81: 2–13.Google Scholar
Sween, Joyce and Clignet, R. 1974 ‘Type of marriage and residential choices in an African city,’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 36: 780–93.Google Scholar
Sween, Joyce and Clignet, R. 1975 The role of plural marriage in family planing policy. Paper read as the American Sociological Association meeting, San Francisco, August, 1975. Chicago: DePaul University, mimeo.Google Scholar
Sween, Joyce and Clignet, R. forthcoming ‘Female matrimonial roles and fertility in Africa,’ in Changing African Family Series. (Proceedings of the XVth International Seminar on Family Research, Lome, Togo, 1976.)Google Scholar