Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T11:24:46.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dissolution of Freetown City Council in 1926: a negative example of political apprenticeship in colonial Sierra Leone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Akintola J. G. Wyse
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Freetown City Council, established in 1893, was the victim of a colonial government which concentrated authority in white hands and resented the survival of a municipality run by Africans. Successive governors regularly presented it as a scapegoat, along with the whole Krio community, for disturbances in Freetown, notably the 1919 anti-Syrian riots and the 1926 railway strike. In 1925 financial malpractices in the council were disclosed and some officials were prosecuted. The following year the Mayor, Cornelius May, editor of the leading newspaper, the Sierra Leone Weekly News, and a highly respected public figure, was charged with conspiracy to defraud, along with the Town Clerk and the City Treasurer, and was given a nine-month prison sentence. Then, on the recommendation of a Commission of Inquiry, the City Council was dissolved and replaced by a Municipal Board.

Résumé

La dissolution du Conseil Municipal de Freetown en 1926: un exemple négatif d'apprentissage politique au Sierra Leone colonial

Libreville fut la première ville en Afrique occidentale coloniale britannique à obtenir une corporation municipale, en 1893. Cette institution était destinée à être «un élément important d'éducation et de culture»—un terrain d'apprentissage pour les homines politiques africains en herbe où ils pourraient apprendre les rudiments de l'art de gouverner. Cependant, la réalité fut tout à fait différente de la théorie.

Par exemple, le Conseil Municipal souffrit d'un certain nombre de faiblesses structurales qui étaient liées à une base de financement inadéquate et aux pouvoirs restraints que lui permettait le gouvernement central. De plus, on apprécia fort peu les efforts des conseillers qui essayaient de concrétiser cet «apprentissage» en se faisant les critiques de l'administration coloniale, soit en tant que membres du conseil législatif ou en tant que citoyens ordinaires, exprimant les craintes des électeurs. Le conseil fut bientôt considéré comme «un nid de démagogues». Une forte désapprobation pour des raisons politiques vint s'ajouter au mécontentement causé par les défauts du conseil. Ces puissants courants qui se manifestèrent durant une période de trouble dans les relations anglo-krio, entraînèrent l'ouverture d'une enquête concernant le conseil et sa dissolution en 1926.

Type
History and politics
Information
Africa , Volume 57 , Issue 4: Sierra Leone, 1787-1987 , October 1987 , pp. 422 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1CO 267/617/FX6906, Affairs of the Freetown Municipality (1926–1927); fact sheet supplied by the Freetown City Council entitled Facts about the City Council of Freetown (n.d.), mimeo. 14 pp.; Goddard, T. N., The Handbook of Sierra Leone (London, 1925); R. Buell, The Native Problem in Africa (London, 1928), I, 874–90; J. D. Hargreaves, A Life of Sir Samuel Lewis (London, 1958); C. Fyfe, A History of Sierra Leone (London, 1962); Arthur Porter, Creoledom (London, 1963); C. Fyfe and E. D. Jones (eds.), Freetown: a Symposium (London, 1968); Ronald Wraith, Local Administration in West Africa (London, 1972), second edition; Keturay Turay, ‘The Administration of the Freetown City Council’, B.A. dissertation, University of Sierra Leone, 1976. A promising master's thesis by a Fourah Bay College student on ‘The History of the Freetown City Council, 1893–1948: an assessment of the institutional role of African politicians in the first half of the twentieth century’, has unfortunately been discontinued. See also J. D. Hargreaves, The End of Colonial Rule in West Africa (London, 1979), pp. 52–4.Google Scholar
2Wraith, Local Administration, 147; Sierra Leone Weekly News (hereafter S.L.W.N., 1900–1926.Google Scholar
3Wraith, Local Administration, 147; Turay, diss., cited; Buell, op. cit.Google Scholar
4Quoted in Fyfe, C., ‘The life and times of John Ezzidio’, Sierra Leone Studies (hereafter S.L.S.), n.s., 4 (1955), 213–23. Bankole-Bright complained to Ormsby-Gore in 1925 that ‘government appears to set out on the policy of embarrassing our corporation in that it tries to cripple its finances by bolting the door against all financial income’. CO 267/612/44387, Bankole-Bright to Ormsby-Gore, 28 September 1925, forwarding résumé of their meeting. Much later the famous British professor, H. Laski, wrote, ‘There is evidence of definite hostility in the service to the normal British ideas of Civil Liberty.’ See his ‘The colonial civil service’, Political Quarterly, IX, 1–4 (1938), 541–51.Google Scholar
5CO 267/616, City Council Affairs, minute by Dawe, A. J., 8 February 1926; CO 267/609/37560, Slater to Amery, 25 July 1925. Colonial Office Minutes.Google Scholar
6See Turay, diss. cited, for these submissions; Wraith, op. cit., 147–8.Google Scholar
7Note 1; for Blyden's view on the Seventeen Nations see Fyfe, A History of Sierra Leone, 497–8. The rooted dislike which the Nova Scotians had towards the idea of paying tax can be gauged from a look at Walker, J. W. St George, The Black Loyalists: the search for a promised land in Nova Scotia and Sierra Leone, 1785–1870 (London, 1976) and Ellen Gibson Wilson, The Loyal Blacks (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
8Pratt, S. A. J., ‘The government of Freetown’, in Fyfe and Jones, Freetown, 154–65. Although it deals more with the later development of the institution, it has some useful information on the earlier part. But see also Goddard, op. cit.; Buell, op. cit., 882–3.Google Scholar
9Buell, 882–3.Google Scholar
10Goddard, op. cit., appendices IX and X. Information on Lemberg is in Colony and Provincial Reporter (C.P.R.), 13 July 1912.Google Scholar
11Turay, diss. cited.Google Scholar
12City Council Fact Sheet 1; Buell, 883–5.Google Scholar
13Buell, op. cit., 883, q.v. 833–7, ibid.Google Scholar
14S.L. W.N., 22 November 1919; Wraith, op. cit., 22.Google Scholar
15CO 267/617, file XF6906, Slater to Amery, 17 December 1926; S.L.W.N., 3 and 10 February 1923.Google Scholar
16CO 267/539, Mereweather to Harcourt, 2 March 1912; CO 267/601/45676, Furley to Devonshire, 4 September 1923; CO 267/612/44387, Bankole-Bright to Ormsby-Gore, 28 September 1925; CO 267/609/37560, Slater to Amery, 25 July 1925; CO 267/616, Memo on Freetown Municipality enclosed in Slater to Amery, 6 January 1926. For instance, Mereweather refused to grant leave to the City Council to contract out the electrification scheme because the council was inefficient and, in any case, the scheme was ‘both of local and imperial importance’. Bright felt the government did this because it wanted to avoid paying taxes to the council. See documents CO 267/609/37560, CO 267/612/44387, CO 267/596/51411, Slater to Churchill, 27 September 1922.Google Scholar
17CO 267/612/44387, Bankole-Bright to Amery, 28 September 1925; Buell, op. cit., 883; Wraith, op. cit., 147–8.Google Scholar
18CO 267/596/51428, Slater to Churchill, 26 September 1922; CO 267/596/51411, Slater to Churchill, 9 September 1922.Google Scholar
19CO 267/595/8340, Maxwell to Churchill, 2 February 1922; Buell, op. cit., 883.Google Scholar
20CO 267/597/53938, Slater to Churchill, 10 October 1922. Reports about the generally poor financial position of Sierra Leone as a whole in this period are in this despatch, and CO 267/596/28230, Maxwell to Churchill, 30 May 1922, enclosures.Google Scholar
21CO 267/610/43609, Slater to Amery, 15 September 1925; CO 267/597/53938, Slater to Churchill, 12 October 1922; CO 267/616, Memo on Freetown Municipality, enclosed in Slater to Amery, 6 January 1926; S.L.W.N., 27 February 1926.Google Scholar
22CO 267/596/51428, Slater to Churchill, 26 September 1922; C O 267/610/43609, Slater to Amery, 15 September 1925; Buell, op. cit., 883–5.Google Scholar
23CO 267/596/51428, Slater to Churchill, 26 September 1922.Google Scholar
24A discussion of the 1919 railway strike and anti-Syrian riots is in Wyse, A. J. G., ‘The 1919 strike and anti-Syrian riots: a Krio plot?’, Journal of the Historical Society of Sierra Leone, III, 1 and 2 (December 1979), 1–14; see also Martin H. Y. Kaniki, ‘Attitudes and reactions towards the Lebanese in Sierra Leone during the colonial period’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, VIII, 1 (1973), 97–113; H. E. Conway, ‘Labour protest activity in Sierra Leone during the early part of die twentieth century’, Labour History, 15 (November 1968), 49–63, and Buell, op. cit., 875. Documentary evidence is in CO 267/582–8.Google Scholar
25CO 267/596/51428, Slater to Churchill, 26 September 1922; CO 267/595/8340, Maxwell to Churchill, 2 February 1922.Google Scholar
26CO 267/587/58875, Wilkinson to Milner, 13 November 1920.Google Scholar
27Quoted in Buell, op. cit., 886.Google Scholar
28CO 267/610/43609, Slater to Amery, 15 September 1925.Google Scholar
29Ibid.; Buell, op. cit., 883.Google Scholar
30S.L.W.N., 1925–1926.Google Scholar
31S.L.W.N., 5,12 and 26 September 1925; 26 December 1925; 6 March, 17 April, 12 and 19 June 1926. For instance, this last issue confessed its bewilderment over ‘some unpleasant disclosures’, for example the spending of £10 by the Mayor without the approval of Council; the loose way mayors signed documents without scrutinising them; but with particular reference to Mayor May it wondered whether a man like him could risk his good reputation to conspire with men he hardly knew within seven months of assuming the mayoralty. See also S.L.W.N., 26 June, 3 and 10 July 1926.Google Scholar
32City Council Fact Sheet, 3.Google Scholar
33See, for example, J. D. Hargreaves's profile on Samuel Lewis, and Bankole-Bright's speech in the Legislative Council, reported in CO 267/617, file XF6906, Report on affairs of Freetown Municipality, enclosed in Slater to Amery, 17 December 1926.Google Scholar
34S.L.W.N., 7 and 28 September, 12 and 19 October 1918. Even the administration publicly acknowledged this help from Mayor E. H. Cummings.Google Scholar
35, Wyse, ‘The 1919 railway strike …’, J.H.S.S.L., III, 1 and 2 (December 1979), 1–14; S.L.W.N., 2 August, 27 September 1919, etc. CO 267/582/56723, Memorial of Citizens of Freetown to Secretary of State, enclosed in Acting Governor to Secretary of State, 13 September 1919; CO 267/583/58101, Wilkinson to Secretary of State, 25 September 1919; CO 267/585/68973. Wilkinson to Secretary of State, 29 January 1920. Mayor Barlatt, said Wilkinson, displayed indefatigable efforts to maintain peace during the 1919 upheavals.Google Scholar
36S.L.W.N., 9 January 1926.Google Scholar
37S.L.W.N., 30 January 1926; CO 267/615, Slater to Amery, 11 February 1926; Wyse, A. J. G., ‘The 1926 railway strike and Anglo-Krio relations: an interpretation’, International Journal of African Historical Studies, XIV, 1 (1981), 93–123.Google Scholar
38CO 267/617, file XF6906, Report on Affairs of Freetown Municipality, enclosed in Slater to Amery, 17 December 1926, reporting speech by E. S. Beoku-Betts; S.L.W.N., 5, 19 and 25 September 1925, and throughout 1925 and 1926.Google Scholar
39Apparently Fowell Boston had a feud with May, and when he stumbled on some evidence of irregularities in the affairs of the council, instead of consulting with May, who was ill at the time, he ‘beat the gun by going to press’. His paper, the Sierra Leone Guardian, carried stories of an alleged fraud of thirty cases of paraffin, and made certain insinuations suggesting that May did not want to be re-elected Mayor so that he could get out of the mess. The trial judge admitted years later that he was misled into convicting May because he thought it would be a popular move, thus implying that some element of vendetta did come in. However, see S.L.W.N.,5 and 12 September 1925; CO 267/616, Memo on Freetown Municipality, enclosed in Slater to Amery, 6 January 1926; CO 267/638/9850, Cookson to Fiddian, 15 June 1932.Google Scholar
40S.L.W.N., 19 September 1925.Google Scholar
41S.L.W.N., 26 September 1925.Google Scholar
42Note 31. Carney, D. E. and Davies, J. E. were charged with forgery and remanded to appear before the magistrate on 28 September 1925. For reports about Songo-Davies's financial scoops see S.L.W.N., 27 February 1926.Google Scholar
43CO 267/610/43609, Slater to Amery, 15 September 1925.Google Scholar
44CO 267/616, Slater to Amery, 6 January 1926. Other documents showing how disenchanted the Colonial Office had become with the Krio are CO 267/588/58875, Wilkinson to Milner, 13 November 1920; CO 267/596/51428, Slater to Churchill, 26 September 1922; CO 267/610/43609, Slater to Amery, 15 August 1925. On the performance of African politicians in the colonial period see Wyse, ‘The Passing of the “Krio Era”: Dr. H. C. Bankole-Bright and Politics in Colonial Sierra Leone, 1919–1958’ (completed ms).Google Scholar
45On the position of governors in colonial dependencies see Kirk-Greene, A. H. M., ‘On governorship and Governors in British Africa’, in Gann, L. H. and Duignan, P. (eds.), African Pro-consuls: European Governors in Africa (New York, 1978), pp. 209–64.Google Scholar
46CO 267/607/7355, Slater to Amery, 30 January 1925; Sierra Leone Legislative Council Debates (hereafter Debates), 27 February 1925; S.L.W.N., 28 February, 7 March 1925.Google Scholar
47Reported in African World, July 1926.Google Scholar
48S.L.W.N., 5 October 1918,4 January 1919; 17 and 24 January, 6 March 1918. C.P.R., 27 June, 3 and 10 August 1918.Google Scholar
49S.L.W.N., 7 and 28 September, 12 and 19 October 1918; CO 267/578/53257, Wilkinson to Long, 21 October 1918.Google Scholar
50S.L.W.N., 27 April, 4 and 6 May 1918, etc. S.L.G.F.M., 3 May 1918; C.P.R., 4 May, 1 June 1918; see , Wyse, ‘The Sierra Leone branch of the National Congress of British West Africa, 1919–1945’, I.J.A.H.S., XVIII, 4 (1985), 675–98.Google Scholar
51Notes 24 and 37. On the 1926 strike see other views in Best, R. J., A History of the Sierra Leone Railway, 1899–1949 (Freetown, 1949); F. A. N. Lisk, ‘Industrial Relations in Sierra Leone’, M.Sc. Econ. thesis, Belfast (1970), pp. 95–8; cf. Buell, op. cit., 888–9; M. Kilson, Political Change in a West African State (Cambridge, Mass.: 1966).Google Scholar
52Colonial Office minutes in CO 267/615, memo on the strike by Fiddian, including letter from Fiddian to Slater, 15 March 1926; CO 267/616/XF5148, File on Mayor May's Trial, Minutes by Ormsby-Gore, 1926; CO 267/666/32216, Jardine to MacDonald, 28 November 1938, minute by A. J. Dawe.Google Scholar
53CO 267/616, Memo on Freetown Municipality, Slater to Amery, 6 January 1926.Google Scholar
54These, such as the attack on Mayor Cummings by a Lieutenant Gaumont, the Barber-Stocks affair and the Inspector Rabbit question have been discussed fully in references cited in note 44. But see C.P.R., 7 December 1918; S.L.G.F.M., 7 February 1919; S.L.W.N., 12 December 1925, 16 January 1926, etc.; CO 267/550, files 9021, 29526 of 1921.Google Scholar
55Notes 24 and 37.Google Scholar
56For instance, Slater's advisers claimed that the ‘Creole [was] guilty of having engineered it [the 1926 strike] from the start, to range himself definitely on the side of disorder …’ and had ‘fanned racial hatred and defied, so far as [he] dared all discipline, law and order … ‘, and he ‘had made an invidious attempt to stir up disaffection through the nominated Protectorate chiefs’. CO 267/613/4084, Slater to Amery, 20 April 1926.Google Scholar
57Notes 31 and 42; CO 267/610/43609, Slater to Amery, 9 September 1925.Google Scholar
58Minutes on documents cited above; CO 267/616, Minutes by Dawe, A. J. on City Council Affairs, 8 February 1926. O'Brien was appointed in April. An official announcement of the commission dated 30 April 1926 was published in S.L.W.N., 8 May 1926; CO 267/616 (1926).Google Scholar
59CO 267/615, Slater to Amery, 3 March 1926, encl. draft article to The Times.Google Scholar
60Ormsby-Gore, W. G. A., Report on his Visit to West Africa during the Year 1926 (London, 1926), p. 57.Google Scholar
61Note 57.Google Scholar
62CO 267/616, Minutes by Fiddian, 27 March 1926.Google Scholar
63Notes 31 and 42. See West Africa, 16 May 1949, for a report on the commission of inquiry into the City Council report of 1949. The new Municipal Board did not find it easy to raise revenue, either. See CO 270/62, Executive Council Meetings of 21 February 1927 and 13 January 1928.Google Scholar
64CO 267/616, Secretary of State to Governor, 7 May 1926, tel.Google Scholar
65Correspondence on the O'Brien commission is in CO 267/617, file XF6906 (1926). Mayor May was tried in May by Assessors P. L. Birbeck, J. W. Anderson (Europeans) and an African, Josiah Elkanah Wright, merchant, Westmorland Street, presided over by Chief Justice Sir Gilbert K. T. Purcell. May was sentenced on 18 May, though he had not been found guilty by the assessors. Carney and Johnson were found guilty and gaoled for nine months. May was, however, released on 5 August 1926 on the grounds of ill health. He died three years later. S.L.W.N., 14 August 1926; CO 267/616/XF5148, file on Mayor May's trial (1926). Many letters of sympathy from sundry places were sent to Mrs May. Liberian News even had a critical piece about British justice: ‘… in matters relating to lives of African subjects’, claimed the paper, ‘colonial methods must be a travesty of justice’. Mayor May was the honorary consul for Liberia in Freetown. See Smallbone to Secretary of State, Foreign Affairs, 1 June 1920, enclosures, in CO 267/616/XF5148.Google Scholar
66CO 267/617, Slater to Amery, 8 December 1926, forwarding O'Brien's report. Colonial Office Minutes.Google Scholar
67S.L.W.N., issues for 1926, for example 12, 19 and 26 June. This last issue in fact made a point that it did not want to believe that May's conviction was a sequence of the railway strike. See also a letter by H. C. Solomon in the same issue. One of the irregularities was the Attorney General at one point sitting with the Chief Justice, though in an unofficial capacity! The shady role of Boston was also acknowledged in a batch of letters sent to the Colonial Office. But there was a marked cynicism in Harry Luke's letter to Fiddian making comments on the trial and hinting at a petition for redress mounted by Bankole-Bright; but he assured Fiddian, ‘Don't be alarmed at the appearance of our despatch 317 of today. There is no earthly need for anyone in the department to read the notes of evidence enclosed, but it pleases people here to think that they have gone to the CO., and you may be getting a petition in favour of the delinquents' release. Then you may want to refer to these proceedings.’ (Private letter enclosed in CO 267/616/XF5148.) Purcell himself regretted going against the decision of the assessors. See CO 267/638/9850, Cookson to Fiddian, 15 June 1932.Google Scholar
68Note 66; CO 270/62, Executive Council Meetings of 3 and 12 November 1926.Google Scholar
69Ibid.Google Scholar
70The debate was reported in CO 267/617, file XF6906 (1926). The Colonial Office agreed that there should be an official ‘as distinct from merely a nominated majority’, but decided not to make any grant, subject to a recommendation from the temporary board which assumed control of City Council affairs on 28 December 1926. See minutes by Dawe (29 March 1927) and Governor to Secretary of State, 28 December 1926, and CO. to Governor, 13 May 1927. Documents in the volume cited in this note.Google Scholar
71Note 66. Fiddian noted on May's trial: ‘All this is very deplorable, but this sort of thing is not unknown elsewhere. Indeed, I have heard of places inhabited almost if not wholly by white people, where the only reason for the Mayor not being imprisoned was alleged to be that nobody thought it worth while to prosecute! All this proves nothing except that they have been unlucky in their Municipal officials.’ Yet the obvious moral was not drawn when the same official, criticising Chief Justice Tew for wishing to make the judiciary an all-white preserve, allegedly on the grounds of the inefficiency of Africans, waspishly commented that they could not condemn the whole Native Bar in Sierra Leone for corruption ‘because an African holding a post has broken down, morally’. Minutes by Fiddian CO 267/616/XF5148, May's trial; cf. minutes on CO 267/634/9589/8, October 1931. Press reports are in issues of S.L.W.N. for January–December 1926.Google Scholar
72S.L.W.N., 7 August 1926.Google Scholar
73See his comments about foreign peoples adopting British culture, in his Report, 23.Google Scholar
74Buell, Native Problem, 1, 890.Google Scholar
75Minutes by Dawe, A. J. on CO 267/623/X9017; also on CO 267/617/XF6906 (29 March 1927). A temporary Municipal Board consisting of government nominees—H. Mitchell, Edwin Taylor and R. S. Forster, Assistant Auditor, in vice Major J. R. Gwyther, Executive Engineer, P.W.D., held office for a year. And in 1928 a new City Council was established with Mitchell as full-time president. Other officials were the Senior Assistant Treasurer, the Senior Sanitary Officer and the Public Health Engineer, ex-officio, and R. Waterhouse Jones, nominated unofficial member. See CO 270/62, Executive Council Meetings of 23 March 1927 and 4 February 1928.Google Scholar
76Buell, op. cit., 887.Google Scholar
77Pratt, S. A. J., art. cit., in Fyfe and Jones, Freetown, 154; Ormsby-Gore, Report, 22.Google Scholar
78Gilbert, A. Sekgoma, ‘Local government reform in Sierra Leone, 1943–1948’, African Research Bulletin, XII, 3 (1983).Google Scholar
79Buell, op. cit., 833–7.Google Scholar
80Bah, M. A., ‘Dr. Herbert C. Bankole-Bright and his Impact on the Growth of Constitutional Government and the Development of Political Parties in Sierra Leone, 1924–1957’, M.A. thesis, Howard, 1977, pp. 18–19, citing J. Ayodele Langley, Pan-Africanism and Nationalism in West Africa, 1900–1945 (Oxford, 1973), p. 133.Google Scholar