Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:24:25.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development, demarcation and ecological outcomes in Maasailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Résumé

Cet article commence par exposer la position des Maasai, leur territoire et l'organisation sociale à l'avènement de la période coloniale. Il documente l'érosion progressive du territoire et l'imposition de nouvelles frontières sur les Maasai depuis les années 1880 jusquʼau présent. Il utilise les études de l'auteur sur l'usage des terres Maasai à présent et sur le système de production sur les terres tanzaniennes des Maasai, ensemble avec des données comparatives sur les terres Maasai au Kenya, afin de montrer comment les communautés Maasai ont fait face à ces contraintes.

Des données sur la performance de l'élevage, la richesse des exploitations, la structure des fermes, et la situation diététique et alimentaire sont utilisées en tant quʼindicateurs écologiques des effets de la création des frontières. Cet article examine l'effet des réponses des communautés Maasai, soit celle qui à consisté à circonvenir les limites imposées, exploitant et dans certains cas attaquant les ressources que les frontières étaient désignées à protéger, ou celle qui a consisté à développer des stratégies afin d'incorporer et d'utiliser à bon effet les débouchés que les frontières peuvent présenter.

Type
Pastoralisms compared
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arhem, K., Homewood, K., and Rodgers, W. A. 1981. A Pastoral Food System: the Ngorongoro Maasai in Tanzania. BRALUP Research Paper No. 70, Dar es Salaam: University of Dar es Salaam.Google Scholar
Behnke, R. 1993. Natural Resource Management in Pastoral Africa.Proceedings of the UNEP workshop ‘Listening to People: social aspects of dryland management’.Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
Behnke, R. 1984. ‘Fenced and open-range ranching: the commercialization of pastoral land and livestock in Africa’, in Simpson, J. and Evangelou, P. (eds), Livestock Development in sub-Saharan Africa, pp. 261–84. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Behnke, R., Scoones, I., and Kerven, C. (eds.) 1993. Range Ecology at Disequilibrium: new models of natural variability and pastoral adaptation in African savannas. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Borner, M. 1985. ‘The increasing isolation of Tarangire National Park’, Oryx 19 (2), 91–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockington, D., and Homewood, K. Forthcoming. ‘Received wisdom, science and pastoralists: debates concerning Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania’, in Leach, M. and Mearns, R. (eds.), The Lie of the Land: challenging received wisdom in African environmental change and policy. London: James Currey, and Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. 1993. ‘Land as ours, land as mine’, in Spear, T. and Waller, R. (eds.), Being Maasai, pp. 258–72. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Dahl, G., and Hjort, A. 1976. Having Herds: pastoral herd growth and household economy. Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology, Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, P. N., and Wilson, R. T. 1987. ‘Comparative productivity of indigenous cattle under traditional management in sub-Saharan Africa’, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 25, 377–90.Google Scholar
Ellis, J., and Swift, J. 1988. ‘Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: alternative paradigms and implications for development’, Journal of Range Management 41 (6), 458–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelou, P. 1985. Livestock Development in Kenya's Maasailand: pastoralist transition to a market economy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Field, C. R., and Moll, G. 1987. ‘Preliminary Report on Livestock Development in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania’. Ngorongoro Conservation and Development Project, NCAA [typescript, 23 pp.], Nairobi: IUCN Regional Office.Google Scholar
Field, C. R., Moll, G., and Ole Sonkoi, C. 1988. Livestock Development. Technical Report No. 1, Ngorongoro Conservation and Development Project, Nairobi: IUCN Regional Office.Google Scholar
Fratkin, E. 1991. Surviving Drought and Development: Ariaal pastoralists of northern Kenya. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Galaty, J. 1980. ‘The Maasai group ranch: politics and development in an African pastoral society’, in Salzmann, P. (ed.), When Nomads Settle: processes of sedenterization as adaptation and response, pp. 157–72. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Galaty, J. 1993. ‘The Rhetoric of Rights: construing Maasai land claims’. American Anthropological Association meeting, Washington, D.C.1721 November.Google Scholar
Graham, O. 1988. ‘Enclosure of the East African rangelands: recent trends and their impact’, Pastoral Development Network 25a. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Grandin, B. E. 1986. ‘Land tenure, subdivision and residential change on a Maasai group ranch’, Bulletin of the Institute for Development Anthropology 4 (2), 913.Google Scholar
Grandin, B. E. 1988. ‘Wealth and pastoral dairy production: a case study from Maasailand’, Human Ecology 16, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, B. E., and Lembuya, P. 1987. ‘The impact of the 1984 drought at Olkarkar Group Ranch, Kajiado, Kenya’, Pastoral Development Network 23e. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science 162, 1243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, A. G. 1985. Population, Health and Nutrition in the Sahel: issues in the welfare of selected West African communities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoben, A. 1976. ‘Social Soundness of the Masai Livestock and Range Management Project’. Arusha: USAID.Google Scholar
Homewood, K. 1992. ‘Development and the ecology of Maasai food and nutrition’, Ecology of Food and Nutrition 29 (1), 6181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homewood, K. 1994a. ‘Pastoralism, environment and development in African rangelands’, in Zaba, B. and Clarke, J. (eds.), Environment and Population Change. Paris: Ordina.Google Scholar
Homewood, K. 1994b. ‘Conservation with Development in East African Rangelands: Mkomazi, Tanzania’. Report to ESCOR Advisory Committee, London: Overseas Development Administration (mimeo, 22 pp).Google Scholar
Homewood, K., and Rodgers, W. A. 1991. Maasailand Ecology: pastoralist development and wildlife conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homewood, K., Rodgers, W. A., and Arhem, K. 1987. ‘Ecology of pastoralism in Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania’, Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 108, 4772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN. 1987. IUCN Directory of Afrotropical Protected Areas. Gland and Cambridge: IUCN.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. 1978. ‘A Final Report on Development in Tanzania Maasailand: the perspective over twenty years, 1957–77’. Arusha: USAID.Google Scholar
Kerven, C. 1992. Customary Commerce: a historical reassessment of pastoralist live-stock marketing in Africa. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Lamprey, H. 1983. ‘Pastoralism yesterday and today: the overgrazing problem’, in Bourliere, F. (ed.), Tropical Savannas, pp. 643–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lane, C., and Moorehead, R. 1995. ‘New directions in rangeland and resource tenure and policy’, in Scoones, I. (ed.), Living with Uncertainty: new directions in pastoral development in Africa, pp. 116–33. London: IIED.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, K. 1987. ‘Integrating parks and pastoralists: some lessons from Amboseli’, in Anderson, D. and Grove, R. (eds.), Conservation in Africa: people, policies and practice, pp. 149–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Little, P. 1983. ‘Absentee herd owners and part-time pastoralists’, Human Ecology 13 (2), 131–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, J., Schofield, E. G., and Pederson, G. 1989. Food Security and Nutritional Status. Ngorongoro Conservation and Development Project, Technical Report No. 10. Nairobi: IUCN Regional Office.Google Scholar
Moris, J. 1981. ‘A case in rural development: the Maasai range development project’, in Moris, J., Managing Induced Rural Development, pp. 99113.Google Scholar
Ndagala, D. 1982. ‘Operation Imparnati: the sedentarisation of the pastoral Maasai in Tanzania’, Nomadic Peoples 10, 2839.Google Scholar
Ndagala, D. 1990. ‘Pastoral territoriality and land degradation in Tanzania’, in Palsson, G. (ed.), From Water to World-making, pp. 175–88. Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.Google Scholar
Nestel, P. S. 1985. ‘Nutritional Status of Maasai Women and Children in relation to Subsistence Food Production’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Nestel, P. S. 1986. ‘A society in transition: developmental and seasonal influences on the nutrition of Masai women and children’, Food and Nutrition Bulletin 8, 218.Google Scholar
NOPA. 1992. Pastoralists at a Crossroads: survival and development issues in African pastoralism. UNICEF/UNSO project for Nomadic Pastoralists in Africa, November. Nairobi: NOPA.Google Scholar
Norton-Griffiths, M. 1995. ‘The long-term conservation of wildlife on the rangelands of the Serengeti ecosystem’, in Sinclair, A. and Arcese, P. (eds.), Serengeti II: research, management and conservation of an ecosystem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Potkanski, T. 1994. Property Concepts, Herding Patterns and Management of Natural Resources among the Ngorongoro and Salei Maasai of Tanzania. Pastoral Land Tenure series, No. 6. London: IIED.Google Scholar
Raikes, P. 1981. Livestock Development and Policy in East Africa. Centre for Development Research, Copenhagen. Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.Google Scholar
Sandford, S. 1983. Management of Pastoral Development in the Third World. Chichester: Wiley, and London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A., and Fryxell, J. 1985. ‘The Sahel of Africa: ecology of a disaster’, Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 987–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sindiga, I. 1984. ‘Land and population problems in Kajiado and Narok, Kenya’, African Studies Review 27, 2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spear, T., and Waller, R. (eds.) 1993. Being Maasai. London: James Currey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, P. 1988. The Maasai of Matapato. Manchester: Manchester University Press, and Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Talle, A. 1988. Women at a Loss. Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology No. 19, Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Talle, A. 1990. ‘Ways of milk and meat among the Maasai’, in Palsson, G. (ed.), From Water to World-making, pp. 7392. Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.Google Scholar
Tanzania Land Commission. 1993. Land Commission Report 2, Selected Land Disputes. Dar es Salaam: Presidential Commission of Inquiry into Land Matters, Chairman Professor I. Shivji.Google Scholar
UNSO. 1994a. Pastoral Development in Africa: proceedings of the first technical consultation of donor and international development agencies, Paris; UNSO/UNDP, 1314 December.Google Scholar
UNSO. 1994b. Pastoral Natural Resource Management and Policy: proceedings of the sub-regional workshop. UNSO/UNDP, Arusha: 610 December.Google Scholar
Waller, R. D. 1976. ‘The Maasai and the British, 1895–1905: the origins of an alliance’, Journal of African History 17 (4), 529–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, R. D. 1988. ‘Emutai: crisis and response in Maasailand, 1883–1902’, in Johnson, D. and Anderson, D. (eds.), The Ecology of Survival: case studies from north-east African history, pp. 73114. London: Lester Crook and Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Waller, R. D. 1990. ‘Tsetse fly in western Narok, Kenya’, Journal of African History 31 (1), 81101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, D. 1994. ‘Conserving savanna eco-systems through community participation: the Amboseli case study’, in Community-based Conservation. New York: Liz Claiborne and Art Ortenberg Foundation.Google Scholar