Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:48:33.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DARKER SIDE OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE: THE POWER DYNAMICS BEHIND RWANDA'S GACACA COURTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2011

Susan Thomson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I argue that the praise of legal and political analysts who perceive Rwanda's gacaca courts as a model of locally grounded and culturally relevant transitional justice is unfounded without consideration of the broader power dynamics in which justice is delivered. Drawing on life history interviews with 37 Rwandan peasants resident in the south-west of the country, I argue that the claims of the Rwandan government that its gacaca courts are promoting peace and reconciliation must also assess the impact of local justice mechanisms on those subject to its demands, namely ordinary people. In the case of Rwanda's gacaca courts, local-level analysis illuminates a darker and largely unexamined aspect of transitional justice – the playing out of local power dynamics and the social and political inequalities masked by the pursuit of justice and reconciliation. My study cautions against a wholesale endorsement of the gacaca courts as an effective and legitimate form of transitional justice. Instead, it is a mechanism of state power than works to reinforce the political power of the ruling RPF and to ply international audiences with the idea that Rwanda is ‘a nation rehabilitated’ from ‘the scourge of genocide’.

Résumé

Cet article soutient que les louanges faites aux analystes juridiques et politiques qui perçoivent les tribunaux gacaca rwandais comme un modèle de justice transitionnelle localement ancrée et culturellement adaptée n'ont de fondement qu’à condition de prendre en compte la dynamique du pouvoir plus large dans laquelle cette justice s'exerce. S'appuyant sur des entretiens de récits de vie menés auprès de 37 paysans rwandais résidant dans le Sud-Ouest du pays, l'article soutient également que les assertions du Gouvernement rwandais selon lesquelles les tribunaux gacaca promeuvent la paix et la réconciliation doivent également évaluer l'impact des mécanismes de la justice locale sur ceux qu'elle contraint, à savoir les gens ordinaires. Dans le cas des tribunaux gacaca rwandais, une analyse à l’échelle locale met en lumière un aspect plus sombre et largement non étudié de la justice transitionnelle: l'exercice de la dynamique du pouvoir local et les inégalités sociales et politiques masquées par la quête de justice et de réconciliation. L'article met en garde contre un soutien total des tribunaux gacaca en tant que forme de justice transitionnelle efficace et légitime. Il s'agit plutôt d'un mécanisme de pouvoir d’État qui œuvre à renforcer le pouvoir politique du RPF actuellement au pouvoir et à vendre aux publics internationaux l'idée que le Rwanda est une nation qui s'est remise du fléau du génocide.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , August 2011 , pp. 373 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brounéus, K. (2008) ‘Truth telling as talking cure? Insecurity and retraumatization in the Rwandan genocide courts’, Security Dialogue 39 (1): 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, J. E. (2008) ‘The injustice of local justice: truth, reconciliation, and revenge in Rwanda’, Genocide Studies and Prevention 3 (2): 173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, A. (2006a) ‘State power, human rights and the rule of law in post-genocide Rwanda: an ethnographic analysis of a grassroots judicial process’, paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia PA, 29 August 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, A. (2006b) ‘Gacaca courts in Rwanda: explaining divisions within the human rights community’, Yale Journal of International Affairs 1 (2): 132–48.Google Scholar
Clark, P. (2010) Justice without Lawyers: peace, justice and reconciliation in Rwanda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge. Worcester: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Howe, G. and McKay, A. (2007) ‘Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in assessing chronic poverty: the case of Rwanda’, World Development 13 (3): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2008) Law and Reality: progress in judicial reform in Rwanda. New York NY: HRW.Google Scholar
Ingelaere, B. (2008) ‘The gacaca courts in Rwanda’ in Huyse, L. and Salter, M. (eds), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation Mechanisms after Violent Conflict: learning from African experiences. Stockholm: International Idea.Google Scholar
Ingelaere, B. (2009) ‘“Does the truth pass across the fire without burning?” Transitional justice and its discontents in Rwanda's gacaca courts’, Journal of Modern African Studies 47 (4): 507–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingelaere, B. (2010) ‘Do we understand life after genocide? Center and periphery in the construction of knowledge in postgenocide Rwanda’, African Studies Review 53 (1): 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. (2005) ‘The case of CARE International in Rwanda’ in Gready, P. and Ensor, J. (eds), Reinventing Development? Translating rights-based approaches from theory into practice. London and New York NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Longman, T. (2006) ‘Justice at the grassroots? Gacaca trials in Rwanda’ in Roht-Arriza, N. and Mariezurrena, J. (eds), Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: beyond truth versus justice. New York NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyerstein, A. (2007) ‘Between law and culture: Rwanda's gacaca and postcolonial legality’, Law and Social Inquiry 32 (2): 467–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of the President of the Republic (1999) The Unity of Rwandans: before the colonial period, under colonial rule and under the First Republic (Kigali: Urugwiro Village).Google Scholar
Penal Reform International (2002) ‘PRI Research Team on Gacaca, Report III’. Kigali: PRI.Google Scholar
Penal Reform International (PRI) (2010) ‘The contribution of the gacaca jurisdictions to resolving cases arising from the genocide: contributions, limitations and expectations of the post-gacaca phase’. London and Kigali: PRI.Google Scholar
Pottier, J. (2002) Re-Imagining Rwanda: conflict, survival and disinformation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rettig, M. (2008) ‘Gacaca: truth, justice and reconciliation in post-genocide Rwanda’, African Studies Review 51 (3): 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyntjens, F. (2006) ‘Post-1994 politics in Rwanda: problematising “liberation” and “democratization”’, Third World Quarterly 27 (6): 1103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, S. (2006) The Order of Genocide: race, power, and war in Rwanda. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, S. (2010) ‘Getting close to Rwandans since the genocide: studying everyday life in highly politicized research settings’, African Studies Review 53 (3): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, S. (2011) ‘Re-education for reconciliation: participant observations on ingando’ in Straus, S. and Waldorf, L. (eds), Reconstructing Rwanda: state building and human rights after mass violence. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
United Nations Office of the High Representative for Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and the Small Island Developing States (UN-OHRLLS) and UN Development Programme (2006), ‘Governance for the future: democracy and development in the least developed countries’, UN-OHRLLS/UNDP report.Google Scholar
Venter, C. M. (2007) ‘Eliminating fear through recreating community in Rwanda: the role of the gacaca courts’, Texas Wesleyan Law Review 13 (2): 577–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldorf, L. (2006) ‘Mass justice for mass atrocity: rethinking local justice as transitional justice’, Temple Law Review 79 (1): 1–87.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (2004) ‘Five faces of power’ in Heldke, L. L. and O'Connor, P. (eds), Oppression, Privilege, and Resistance: theoretical perspectives on racism, sexism and heterosexism. Boston MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar