Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:11:47.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Swazi Royal Ritual1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2012

Extract

In his Frazer Lecture of 1952, Rituals of Rebellion in South-East Africa (1954), Professor Max Gluckman considers certain types of ritual behaviour as institutionalized expressions of rebellion against authority. He maintains that this expression is an important function of such ritual. The following quotations present the gist of his interpretation:

I shall therefore consider the social components of ceremonies, analogous to those which concerned Frazer, among the South-Eastern Bantu.…Here there are…performed, as elsewhere in Africa, national and local ceremonies at the break of the rains, sowing, first fruits, and harvest.…But whatever the ostensible purpose of the ceremonies, a most striking feature of their organization is the way in which they openly express social tensions. Women have to assert license and dominance as against their formal subordination to men, princes have to behave to the kings as if they covet the throne, and subjects openly state their resentment of authority. Hence I call them rituals of rebellion. I shall argue that some ritual rebellions proceed within an established distribution of power, and not about the structure of the system itself. This allows for instituted protest, and in complex ways renews the unity of the system (1954, p. 3).

We are here confronted with a cultural mechanism which challenges study by sociologists, psychologists, and biologists, the analysis in detail of the process by which this acting of conflict achieves a blessing—social unity. Clearly we are dealing with the general problem of catharsis set by Aristotle … the purging of emotion through ‘pity, fear and inspiration’. Here I attempt only to analyze the sociological setting of the process (1954, p. 20).

Résumé

LE RITUEL ROYAL DES SWAZI

Cet article propose une interprétation des rites royaux annuels des Swazi, différente de celle de Gluckman exprimée en termes d'agression et de conflit social. Il soutient que ces cérémonies tendent uniquement à séparer le roi des Swazi des groupes sociaux qui forment sa nation, de manière à le libérer et à le rendre disponible pour assumer la charge et les pouvoirs surnaturels de prêtre-roi de la nation entière, embrassant et transcendant l'ensemble des groupes et des catégories. Aussi, bon nombre des actes rituels Swazi, que Gluckman classe comme agressifs et portés au conflit, sont-ils actuellement considérés comme de simples moyens de parachever une telle séparation. Ces cérémonies exaltent le puissant statut, le statut prééminent, et leur mode d'expression allie des attributs de prééminence aussi communs que la nudité à la combinaison de catégories idéologiques et de qualités morales normalement tenues pour distinctes et opposées. Le roi y acquiert une personnalité ambiguë et quasi monstrueuse en vue de se rendre efficace. dans l'ordre surnaturel. Cette interprétation paraît plus en accord avec l'ensemble des croyances swazi et du symbolisme décrits dans ce même article.

Certaines pensées téléologiques semblent inhérentes à la confiance de Gluckman dans son analyse du rituel en termes de fonctions sociales latentes plutôt qu'en cherchant la clef du rituel dans le symbolisme lui-même. Ces symboles sont efficaces par leur relation avec certains états affectifs de l'être humain—états pré-verbaux, pré-rationnels—et, en dernier lieu, représentent un sujet qui ne pourra être valablement approfondi qu'au moyen d'une recherche interdisciplinaire détaillée réunissant des ethnologues, des linguistes et des psychologues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 1966 , pp. 373 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anonymous, , 1940. ‘Witchcraft in Swaziland’, Nature, cxlv. 664.Google Scholar
Beemer, H. 1935. ‘The Swazi Rain Ceremony’, Bantu Studies, ix. 273–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beemer, H. 1937. ‘The Development of the Military Organisation in Swaziland’, Africa, x. 5575, 176–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beidelman, T. O. 1964. ‘Pig (Guluwe): an Essay on Ngulu Sexual Symbolism and Ceremony’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, xx. 359–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, A. T. 1929. Olden Times in Zululand and Natal, Longmans, Green & Co., London.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. 1965. ‘Review Article’, American Anthropologist, lxvii. 950–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, P. A. W. 1930. ‘The Inqwala Ceremony of the Swazi’, Bantu Studies, iv. 205–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, P. A. W. 1931. ‘History and Isibongo of the Swazi Chiefs’, Bantu Studies, v. 181201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doke, C. M., and Vilakazi, B. W. 1958. Zulu-English Dictionary, Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, 1966. Purity and Danger, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Dumbrell, H. J. P. 1952. ‘Pyre Burning in Swaziland’, African Studies, xi. 190–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht, J. A. 1930 a. ‘Swazi Texts with Notes’, Annals of the University of Stellenbosch, 8b, no. 2.Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, J. A. 1930 b. ‘Swazi Customs relating to Marriage’, Annals of the University of Stellenbosch, no. 3.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1956. Nuer Religion, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fortes, M., and Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. ‘Introduction’ to African Political Systems, Oxford University Press (for International African Institute), London.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. 1948. Kingship and the Gods, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1938. ‘Social Aspects of the First Fruits Ceremonies among the South-Eastern Bantu’, Africa, xi. 2541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1954. Rituals of Rebellion in South-East Africa, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1963. Order and Rebellion in Africa, Cohen & West, London.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1964. (ed.) Closed Systems and Open Minds, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1965. Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. 1925. The Essential Kaffir, Black, London.Google Scholar
Krige, J. D. 1944. ‘The Magical Thought-Pattern of the Bantu in Relation to Health Services’, African Studies, xi. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, H. (née Beemer), 1944. ‘A Ritual of Kingship among the Swazi’, Africa, xiv. 230–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, H. 1945. ‘The Marriage of a Swazi Princess’, Africa, xv. 145–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, H. 1947. An African Aristocracy: Rank among the Swazi, Oxford University Press (for International African Institute), London.Google Scholar
Kuper, H. 1950. ‘Kinship among the Swazi’, pp. 86–110, in African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, eds. Radcliffe-Brown, A. and Forde, D., Oxford University Press (for International African Institute), London.Google Scholar
Kuper, H. 1952. The Swazi, Oxford University Press (for International African Institute), London.Google Scholar
Kuper, H. 1964. The Swazi: a South African Kingdom, Holt, Rinehardt, & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1961. Rethinking Anthropology, Athlone, London.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1964. ‘Some Anthropological Aspects of Language’, pp. 23–63, in New Directions in the Study of Language, ed. Lenneberg, E., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1963. Totemism, Beacon, Boston.Google Scholar
Marwick, B. A. 1940. The Swazi, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norbeck, E. 1963. ‘African Rituals of Conflict’, American Anthropologist, lxv. 1254–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norbeck, E. 1965. ‘Reply to van den Berghe’, American Anthropologist, lxvii. 487–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, O. R. 1921. Adventures in Swaziland, Century, New York.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. (ed.). The Bantu-Speaking Tribes of South Africa, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Schoeman, P. J. 1935. ‘The Swazi Rain Ceremony’, Bantu Studies, ix. 168–75.Google Scholar
Sundkler, B. 1965. ‘Chiefs and Prophets in Zululand and Swaziland’, pp. 276–90, in African Systems of Thought, eds. Fortes, M. and Dieterlen, G., Oxford University Press (for International African Institute), London.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1962 a. Chihamba the White Spirit, Rhodes–Livingstone Paper No. 33, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1962 b. ‘Three Symbols of Passage in Ndembu Circumcision Ritual’, pp. 124–73, in Essays in the Ritual of Social Relations, ed. Gluckman, M., Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1964. Betwixt and Between: the Liminal Period in Rites de Passage, mimeograph.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1966. ‘Colour Classification in Ndembu Ritual’, pp. 47–85, in 3 Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion, Tavistock (A.S.A. Monograph), London.Google Scholar
Twala, R. 1951. ‘Beads as Regulating the Social Life of the Zulu and Swazi’, African Studies, x. 113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twala, R. 1952. ‘Umhlanga (Reed) Ceremony of Swazi Maidens’, African Studies, xi. 93104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berghe, P. 1965. ‘Some Comments on Norbeck's “African Rituals of Conflict”’, American Anthropologist, lxvii. 485–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weightman, J. 1965. ‘The Sacred Monster’, The Observer, 28 February 1965, London.Google Scholar
Ziervogel, D. 1952. A Grammar of Swazi, Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Ziervogel, D. 1957. Swazi Texts, van Schaik, Pretoria.Google Scholar