Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:37:28.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

STATE POLICING AND INVISIBLE FORCES IN MOZAMBIQUE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2014

Abstract

This article explores how the state police in Mozambique tried to (re)encroach upon a former war zone and what their methods implied for state authority more generally. Post-war reform efforts to professionalize the police in accordance with the rule of law and human rights have had apparently paradoxical results. This is in part because efforts to constitute state authority have relied on both embracing and taming ‘tradition’ as an alternative domain of authority, order and law. Ethnographic fieldwork at police stations shows that the police increasingly handle witchcraft cases and spiritual problems. This, the article argues, does not only reflect a tension between local/customary and state/legal notions of order and justice. Equally significant is the existence of partial sovereignties. A spiritual idiom of power and evildoing constitutes an alternative articulation of sovereignty due to the capacity of invisible forces to give and take life. This is an idiom mastered by chiefs and healers. Police officers engage with invisible forces to gain popular legitimacy and manifest state power, and yet they never manage to fully master those forces. Consequently, state police authority remains uncertain, and must be continually reinforced by enacting hierarchies and jurisdictional boundaries and by using force.

Résumé

Cet article explore la manière dont la police d’État au Mozambique a tenté de faire une (nouvelle) incursion dans une ancienne zone de combat et, plus généralement, les implications de ce mode d'action pour l'autorité de l'État. Les efforts de réforme engagés après guerre pour professionnaliser la police dans le respect de l'autorité de la loi et des droits humains ont apparemment eu des résultats paradoxaux. Ceci tient en partie au fait que les efforts de constituer une autorité d’État se sont fondés sur l'acceptation et la maîtrise de la « tradition » comme domaine alternatif de l'autorité, de l'ordre et de la loi. Des travaux ethnographiques menés dans les commissariats de police montrent que la police traite un nombre croissant de cas de sorcellerie et de problèmes spirituels. L'article soutient que ceci ne reflète pas seulement une tension entre les notions locales/coutumières et étatiques/légales de l'ordre et de la justice. L'existence de souverainetés partielles est tout aussi importante. Un idiome spirituel du pouvoir et du mal constitue une articulation alternative de la souveraineté due à la capacité de forces invisibles à donner et à ôter la vie. C'est un idiome que maîtrisent les chefs et les guérisseurs. Les policiers invoquent des forces invisibles pour gagner une popularité populaire et manifester le pouvoir de l'État, sans pour autant parvenir à pleinement maîtriser ces forces. En conséquence, l'autorité de la police d’État demeure incertaine et a constamment besoin d’être renforcée en édictant des hiérarchies et des frontières juridictionnelles, et en usant de la force.

Type
Policing communities
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsen, R. and Williams, M. (2009) ‘Security beyond the state: global security assemblages in international politics’, International Political Sociology 3 (1): 117.Google Scholar
Albrecht, P., Kyed, H. M., Harper, E. and Isser, D. (eds) (2011) Perspectives on Involving Non-state and Customary Actors in Justice and Security Reform. Rome: International Development Law Organisation (IDLO).Google Scholar
Alexander, J. (1997) ‘The local state in post-war Mozambique: political practices and ideas about authority’, Africa 67 (1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, B. (2002) Taking the Law into their Own Hands: lawless law enforcers in Africa. Burlington VT and Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Bertelsen, B. E. (2009) ‘Multiple sovereignties and summary justice in Mozambique: a critique of some legal anthropological terms’, Social Analysis 53 (3): 123–47.Google Scholar
Boege, V., Brown, A. M. and Clements, K. P. (2009) ‘Hybrid political orders, not fragile states’, Peace Review 21 (1): 1321.Google Scholar
Brown, A. M., Boege, V., Clements, K. P. and Nolan, A. (2010) ‘Challenging statebuilding as peacebuilding – working with hybrid political orders to build peace’ in Richmond, O. P. (ed.), Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding: critical developments and approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Buur, L. and Kyed, H. M. (2005) State Recognition of Traditional Authority in Mozambique: the nexus of community representation and state assistance. Discussion Paper 28. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
Buur, L. and Kyed, H. M. (2006) ‘Contested sources of authority: re-claiming state sovereignty and formalizing traditional authority in post-conflict Mozambique’, Development and Change 37 (4): 847–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, K. P., Boege, V., Brown, M. A., Nolan, A. and Foley, W. (2007) ‘State building reconsidered: the role of hybridity in the formation of political order’, Political Science 59 (1): 4556.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. L. (eds) (2006) Law and Disorder in the Postcolony. Chicago IL and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, V. and Poole, D. (2004) Anthropology in the Margins of the State. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geffray, C. (1991) A causa das armas: antropologia da guerra contemporânea em Moçambique. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Geschiere, P. (1996) ‘Chiefs and the problem of witchcraft: varying patterns in south and west Cameroon’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 28 (37–38): 307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, T. B. and Stepputat, F. (eds) (2005) Sovereign Bodies: citizens, migrants and states in the postcolonial world. Princeton NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igreja, V. (2012) ‘Negotiating order in post-war Mozambique: the role of community courts in redressing unsettled wartime conflicts’ in Kyed, H. M., Coelho, J. P. B., de Souto, A. N. and Araújo, S. (eds), The Dynamics of Legal Pluralism in Mozambique. Maputo: Kapicua.Google Scholar
Jacobs, C. (2012) ‘Spirits at the police station and the district court’ in Kyed, H. M., Coelho, J. P. B., de Souto, A. N. and Araújo, S. (eds), The Dynamics of Legal Pluralism in Mozambique. Maputo: Kapicua.Google Scholar
Jones, T. and Newborn, T. (2006) Plural Policing: a comparative perspective. London and New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kyed, H. M. (2007a) ‘State Recognition of Traditional Authority’. PhD thesis, Roskilde University.Google Scholar
Kyed, H. M. (2007b) ‘The politics of policing: re-capturing “zones of confusion” in rural post-war Mozambique’ in Buur, L., Jensen, S. and Stepputat, F. (eds), The Security Development Nexus: expressions of sovereignty and securitization in southern Africa. Uppsala and Pretoria: Nordic Africa Institute and HSRC.Google Scholar
Kyed, H. M. (2009a) ‘The politics of legal pluralism: state policies on legal pluralism and their local dynamics in Mozambique’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 59: 87120.Google Scholar
Kyed, H. M. (2010) The Contested Role of Community Policing: ‘new’ non-state actors in the plural legal landscape of Mozambique. DIIS Working Paper, 2010: 26. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.Google Scholar
Kyed, H. M. (2011) ‘Introduction to special issue: legal pluralism and international development interventions’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 43 (63): 124.Google Scholar
Kyed, H. M. and Buur, L. (2006) ‘New sites of citizenship: recognition of traditional authority and group-based citizenship in Mozambique’, Journal of Southern African Studies 32 (3): 563–81.Google Scholar
Lambach, D. and Kraushaar, M. (2008) Hybrid Political Orders: the added value of a new concept. Brisbane: Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies.Google Scholar
Lippert, R. and O'Connor, D. (2003) ‘Security assemblages: airport security, flexible work and liberal governance’, Alternatives 28 (33): 331–58.Google Scholar
Loader, I. (2000) ‘Plural policing and democratic governance’, Social and Legal Studies 9 (3): 323–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, C. (2006) ‘Twilight institutions: public authority and local politics in Africa’, Development and Change 37 (4): 685706.Google Scholar
Meneses, M. P. (2004) ‘Toward interlegality? Traditional healers and the law in postcolonial Mozambique’, Beyond Law 30: 139.Google Scholar
Meneses, M. P. (2012) ‘Legal pluralism and plural memories: the perseverance of spirits in Mozambique’ in Kyed, H. M., Coelho, J. P. B., de Souto, A. N. and Araújo, S. (eds), The Dynamics of Legal Pluralism in Mozambique. Maputo: Kapicua.Google Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1988) ‘Legal pluralism’, Law & Society Review 22 (5): 869–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratten, D. (2007) ‘Singing thieves: history and practice in Nigerian popular justice’ in Pratten, D. and Sen, A. (eds), Global Vigilantes. London and New York NY: Hurst and Co. and Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
República de Moçambique (2004) Constitução da República. Maputo: Imprensa Nacional de Moçambique.Google Scholar
Santos, B. S. (2006) ‘The heterogeneous state and legal pluralism in Mozambique’, Law & Society Review 40 (1): 3975.Google Scholar
Stepputat, F. (2013) ‘Contemporary governscapes: sovereign practice and hybrid orders beyond the centre?’ in Bouziane, M., Harders, C. and Hoffmann, A. (eds), Local Politics and Contemporary Transformations in the Arab World: governance beyond the centre. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
West, H. G. (2005) Kupilikula: governance and the invisible realm in Mozambique. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wisler, D. and Bonvin, B. (2004) Human Security, Development and Local Policing. Geneva: TC Team Consult.Google Scholar
Wood, J. and Shearing, C. (2007) Imagining Security. Portland OR: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar