Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:59:22.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reinterpreting the Rural–Urban Connection: Migration Practices and Socio-Cultural Dispositions of Buhera Workers in Harare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Jens A. Andersson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the academic debate on labour migration and urbanisation in Southern Africa the persistence of links between urban workers and people in rural areas has proved a pertinent issue. As is implied by the term labour migration, economic forces have always been regarded as a major determinant of migratory behaviour. State-centred perspectives have dominated studies of rural–urban migration in Zimbabwe, where a restrictive legal framework regulated migration to urban centres during the colonial era in an attempt to prevent large numbers of Africans becoming permanent town dwellers. This ethnographic study of labour migrants in Harare originating from the Buhera district, however, shifts away from perspectives that reduce migratory behaviour to an effect of state intervention and/or economic forces. Such external forces are mediated by migrants’ networks that encompass both rural and urban localities. Rather than being only economically motivated, individual migrants’ participation in these networks has to be understood as an expression of a socio-cultural pattern in which rural identification and kinship ideology are of major importance. Viewing migration practices in this way—i.e. as observable outcomes of migrants’ socio-cultural dispositions—not only helps us to understand better the preferences that motivate economic behaviour but also challenges conventional perspectives in which the rural and urban are often viewed as distinct social worlds and the urbanisation process as part of a wider evolutionary development or transition towards a modern class society.

Résumé

Dans le débat académique sur la migration de la main-d'œuvre et l'urbanisation en Afrique australe, la persistance des liens entre les travailleurs urbains et les habitants de zones rurales s'est avérée être une question pertinente. Comme l'implique le terme «migration de la main-d'œuvre», les forces économiques ont toujours été considérées comme un élément déterminant majeur du comportement migratoire. Les perspectives centrées sur l'État ont dominé les études sur la migration rurale-urbaine au Zimbabwe, où un cadre juridique restrictif régulait la migration vers les centres urbains au cours de la période coloniale pour tenter d'empêcher un nombre important d'Africains de devenir des citadins permanents. Cette étude ethnographique d'ouvriers originaires du district de Buhera immigrés à Harare s'éloigne cependant des perspectives qui réduisent le comportement migratoire à un effet de l'intervention étatique et/ou des forces économiques. Ces forces extérieures sont canalisées par des réseaux de migrants qui englobent à la fois des localités rurales et des localités urbaines. Il faut comprendre la participation des migrants individuels à ces réseaux non pas seulement comme une démarche dont les motivations sont économiques, mais comme l'expression d'un modèle socioculturel dans lequel l'identification rurale et l'idéologie de la parenté ont une importance majeure. Cette faon de voir les pratiques migratoires, autrement dit comme des résultats observables des inclinations socioculturelles des migrants, non seulement aide à mieux comprendre les préférences qui motivent le comportement économique, mais aussi remet en question les perspectives conventionnelles dans lesquelles le rural et l'urbain sont souvent considérés comme des mondes sociaux distincts et le processus d'urbanisation comme faisant partie d'une évolution ou transition plus large vers une société de classe moderne.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 82 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alderson-Smith, G. 1984. ‘Confederations of households: extended domestic enterprises in city and country’, in Long, Norman and Roberts, Bryan (eds), Miners, Peasants and Entrepreneurs, pp. 217–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, J. A. 1999. ‘The politics of land scarcity: land disputes in Save Communal Area, Zimbabwe’, Journal of Southern African Studies 25 (4), 553–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, J. A.(forthcoming). ‘Administrators’ knowledge and state control in colonial Zimbabwe: the invention of the rural–urban divide in Buhera district, 1912–80’, Journal of African History.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: cultural dimensions of globalisation. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Arrighi, G. 1973. ‘The political economy of Rhodesia’, in Arrighi, Giovanni and Saul, John (eds), Essays on the Political Economy of Africa, pp. 336–77. Nairobi: East African Publishing House.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. 1995. ‘“So that a labourer could live with his family”: overlooked factors in social and economic strife in urban colonial Zimbabwe, 1945–52’, Journal of Southern African Studies 21 (1), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. ’“We are afraid to command our children”: responses to the urbanisation of African women in colonial Zimbabwe, 1930–44’, in Raftopoulos, B. and Yoshikuni, T. (eds), Sites of Struggle: essays in Zimbabwe's urban history, pp. 95–112. Harare: Weaver Press.Google Scholar
Bates, R. H. 1988. ‘Governments and agricultural markets in Africa’, in Bates, R. H. (ed.), Toward a Political Economy of Development: a rational choice perspective, pp. 331–58. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, D. 1994. The Shona and their neighbours. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1998. Practical Reason: on the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdillon, M. F. C. 1977. ‘Labour migrants from Korekore country’, Zambezia 5 (1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Bourdillon, M. F. C. 1987. The Shona Peoples: an ethnography of the contemporary Shona, with special reference to their religion. Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
Bourdillon, M. F. C. 1994. ‘Street children in Harare’, Africa 64 (4), 516–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Statistical Office. 1976. Census of Population 1969. Salisbury: Central Statistical Office.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office. 1987. District Population Sheets: Mashonaland—East. Harare: Central Statistical Office.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office. 1989. Zimbabwe in Maps: a census atlas. Harare: Central Statistical Office.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office. 1994. Census 1992: national report. Harare: Central Statistical Office.Google Scholar
Chauncey, G. 1981. ‘The locus of reproduction: women's labour on the Zambian Copperbelt, 1927–53’, Journal of Southern African Studies 7 (2), 135–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazan, N.Mortimer, R., Ravenhill, J. and Rothchild, D. 1992. Politics and Society in Contemporary Africa. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Cheater, A. P. 1986. The Politics of Factory Organization. Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
De Haan, A. 1999. ‘Livelihoods and poverty: the role of migration—a critical review of the migration literature’, Journal of Development Studies 36 (2), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vletter, F. 1998. Sons of Mozambique: Mozambican miners and post-apartheid South Africa. Cape Town: Southern African Migration Project.Google Scholar
Den Ouden, J. H. B. 1989. A Three-generation Perspective: its importance for ethnographic research in development studies. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Eades, J. S. 1993. Strangers and Traders: Yoruba migrants, markets and the state in northern Ghana. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press for the International African Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1990a. ‘Mobile workers, modernist narratives: a critique of the historiography of transition on the Zambian Copperbelt’ I, Journal of Southern African Studies 16 (3), 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1990b. ‘Mobile workers, modernist narratives: a critique of the historio graphy of transition on the Zambian Copperbelt’ II, Journal of Southern African Studies 16 (4), 603–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1994. ‘Modernist narratives, conventional wisdoms and colonial liberalism: reply to a straw man’, Journal of Southern African Studies 20 (4), 633–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1997. ‘Country and city on the Copperbelt’, in Gupta, Anil and Ferguson, James (eds), Culture, Power, Place: explorations in critical anthropology, pp. 137–54. Durham NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1999. Expectations of Modernity: myths and meanings of urban life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Garbett, G. K. 1967. ‘Prestige, status and power in a valley Korekore chiefdom, Rhodesia’, Africa 37 (3), 307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargett, E. 1977. The Administration of Transition. Gwelo: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1993. The Interpretation of Cultures. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Geschiere, P. and Gugler, J. 1998. ‘The urban–rural connection: changing issues of belonging and identification’, Africa 68 (3), 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannerz, U. 1980. Exploring the City: inquiries toward an urban anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, K. T. 1997. Keeping House in Lusaka. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Heer, D. M. 1996. ‘Migration’, in Kuper, A. and Kuper, J. (eds), The Social Science Encyclopaedia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holleman, J. F. 1949. The Pattern of Hera Kinship. London: Oxford University Press for the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute.Google Scholar
Holleman, J. F. 1952. Shona Customary Law: with reference to kinship, marriage, the family and the estate. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Long, N. 1977. An Introduction to the Sociology of Rural Development. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Long, N. 1984. ‘Creating space for change: a perspective on the sociology of development’. Inaugural lecture, Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Mac Millan, H. 1993. ‘The historiography of transition on the Zambian Copperbelt: another view’, Journal of Southern African Studies 19 (4), 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, P. and Mayer, I. 1974. Townsmen and Tribesmen: conservatism and the process of urbanization in a South African city. Second edition, Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1956. The Kalela Dance: aspects of social relationships among urban Africans in Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press for the Rhodes–Livingstone Institute.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1969. ‘Structural plurality, urbanization and labour circulation in South ern Rhodesia’, inJackson, J. A. (ed.), Migration, pp. 156–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1975. ‘Factors in rural male absenteeism in Rhodesia’, in Parkin, D. (ed.), Town and Country in Central and Eastern Africa, pp. 93–112. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1987. Cities, Society, and Social Perception: a Central African perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Møller, V. 1978. Urban Commitment and Involvement among Black Rhodesians: a comparative study of migration and urbanisation in three Salisbury townships. Durban: CASS/University of Natal.Google Scholar
Mutambirwa, C. C. and Potts, D. H. 1987. ‘Changing patterns of African rural–urban migration and urbanization in Zimbabwe’, Eastern and Southern Africa Geographical Journal 1 (1), 26–39.Google Scholar
Mutizwa-Mangiza, N. D. 1986. ‘Urban centres in Zimbabwe: intercensal changes, 1962–82’, Geography 71 (2), 148–50.Google Scholar
Muzvidziwa, V. 1997. ‘Rural–urban linkages: Masvingo's double-rooted female heads of households’, Zambezia 24 (2), 97–123.Google Scholar
Nyamnjoh, F. and Rowlands, M. 1998. ‘Elite associations and the politics of belonging in Cameroon’, Africa 68 (3), 320–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’ Laughlin, B. 1998. ‘Missing men? The debate over rural poverty and women-headed households in Southern Africa’, Journal of Peasant Studies 25 (2), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paton, B. 1995. Labour Export Policy in the Development of Southern Africa. Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phimister, I. 1993. ‘Rethinking the reserves: Southern Rhodesia's Land Husbandry Act reviewed’, Journal of Southern African Studies 19 (2), 225–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, D. H. 1995. ‘Shall we go home? Increasing urban poverty in African cities and migration processes’, Geographical Journal 161 (3), 245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, D. H. and Mutambirwa, C. C. 1990. ‘Rural–urban linkages in contemporary Harare: why migrants need their land’, Journal of Southern African Studies 16 (4), 677–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftopoulos, B. 1995. ‘Nationalism and labour in Salisbury, 1953–65’, Journal of Southern African Studies 21 (1), 79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodesia, . 1971. 1969 Population Census: interim report II, The African population. Salisbury: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Scarnecchia, T. 1996. ‘Poor women and nationalist politics: alliances and fissures in the formation of a nationalist political movement in Salisbury, Rhodesia, 1950–56’, Journal of African History 37 (2), 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smelser, N. J. 1963. ‘Mechanisms of change and adjustment to change’, in Hoselitz, B. F. and Moore, W. E. (eds), Industrialization and society, pp. 32–54. The Hague: Mouton/UNESCO.Google Scholar
Smout, M. A. H. 1976. ‘Urbanisation of the Rhodesian population’, Zambezia 4 (2), 79–91.Google Scholar
Stopforth, P. 1971. Survey of Highfield African Township. Occasional paper 6, Salisbury: Department of Sociology, University of Rhodesia.Google Scholar
Van Velsen, J. 1960. ‘Labour migration as a positive factor in the continuity of Tonga tribal society’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 8 (3), 265–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, W. 1958. Tribal Cohesion in a Money Economy: a study of the Mambwe people of Zambia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. 1941–1942. An Essay on the Economics of Detribalization in Northern Rhodesia I-II. Manchester: Manchester University Press for the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute.Google Scholar
Wolpe, H. 1972. ‘Capitalism and cheap labour-power in South Africa: from segregation to apartheid’, Economy and Society 1 (4), 425–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 1981. Accelerated Development in sub-Saharan Africa: an agenda for action. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1994. Adjustment in Africa: reforms, results, and the road ahead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshikuni, T. 1999. ‘Notes on the influence of town-country relations on African urban history, before 1957: experiences of Salisbury and Bulawayo’, in Raftopoulos, B. and Yoshikuni, T. (eds), Sites of Struggle: essays in Zimbabwe's urban history, pp. 113–28. Harare: Weaver Press.Google Scholar
Zinyama, L.Tevera, D. and Cumming, S. (eds). 1993. Harare: the growth and problems of the city. Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publishers.Google Scholar