Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:20:50.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Principles of Phonetic Adaptation in Swahili Applied to Christian Names

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2012

Extract

It is a well established fact that every culture contact has its effect on language. Every new thing or concept that is introduced requires a name. This is achieved either by coining a word in the language of the people to whom it is introduced or by the adoption of a foreign word. Thus it is possible to trace the different culture influences on any people by establishing the origin of the foreign words in their language. The fact that in Swahili most commercial terms are of Arabic origin (e.g. fedha = money, duka = shop, biashara = trade, &c.) would seem to prove that from ancient times Arabic traders sold their wares on the coast of East Africa. Today the increasing number of English words in Swahili is indicative of the influence of British administration and its introduction of modern amenities (baisikeli = bicycle, motakaa = motor-car, reli = railway, &c). The spread of Christianity in Africa may be seen by the general use of such words as padre (priest), ubatizo (baptism), Biblia (Bible), &c, as also from the use of Christian names now heard everywhere. Even among pagans there are so-called wapenda jina (people who desire a name), who are ashamed of their pagan names and call themselves Pauli, Kasiani, &c, in order to belong, by name at least, to Christianity, the religion of the day.

Résumé

LES PRINCIPES DE L'ADAPTATION PHONÉTIQUE EN SUAHÉLI, APPLIQUÉS AUX PRÉNOMS CHRÉTIENS

En conséquence du contact avec l'Europe plusieurs mots étrangers, aussi que des prénoms européens, se trouvent aujourd'hui dans les langues africaines. On admet, généralement, que de tels mots doivent être adaptés conformément aux lois phonétiques des languès indigènes. Cependant les noms de personnes sont fréquemment employés sans aucune adaptation, ou bien modifiés en des manières diverses. L'auteur se met à exposer les principes selon lesquels il se propose de rédacter une list de prénoms chrétiens afin d'en assurer une forme unifiée adaptée aux lois phonétiques suahéli.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 128 note 1 For the general principles of Swahili phonetics and their application to foreign words we refer the reader to two important articles: Tucker, A. N. and Ashton, O. E., ‘Swahili Phonetics’, African Studies, i (1942), pp. 77103, 161-83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tucker, A. N., ‘Foreign Sounds in Swahili’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, xi (1946), pp. 854–71, xii (1947), pp. 214–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar As the present article is concerned with spelling rather than pronunciation, the reader interested in a more detailed study of Swahili phonetics will have to consult those articles. Cf. also the lists of approved foreign words published from time to time in the Bulletin of the Inter-Territorial Language (Swahili) Committee to the East African Dependencies; and Gower, R. H., ‘Swahili Borrowings from English’, Africa, xxii (1952), pp. 154–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 128 note 2 The need for phonetic adaptation of Christian terminology in general has been fully discussed in our book Die christliche Terminologie als missionsmethodisches Problem, dargestellt am Swahili und an andern Bantusprachen, Administration der Neuen Zeit schrift für Missionswissenschaft, Schöneck/Beckenried (Switzerland) 1950, pp. 3552.Google Scholar Points other than phonetics connected with Christian names were discussed by the present writer in the article Taufname und Taufpatron bei den Missionschristen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung Ost-Afrikas’, Neue Zeitschrift für Missionswissenschaft, viii (1952), pp. 120.Google Scholar