Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:36:13.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘First the forest’: conservation, ‘community’ and ‘participation’ in south-west Cameroon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Extract

Western concern with ‘conserving’ or ‘managing’ the rain forests of Africa has led to the setting up of a number of conservation projects. In such projects the ‘participation’ of the ‘community’ in forest conservation has become the new orthodoxy. However, proposals about local people's participation presume that defining the future of the forest is a straight contest between the alternatives of conservation or forest clearing. Such proposals also presume that the existence of communities is non-problematic. In contrast, this article documents that there is already considerable local debate about forest use and conservation, much of it among those excluded from the formal arena of politics and policy-making. Concern with ‘the environment’ includes concern about the perpetuation of society, and represents a clear continuation of West African village cosmologies focused on the societalisation of space. At the same time, conservation aims of ‘keeping the forest as it is’ have few resonances, since forest people see society itself as an artful, but often problematic, construction in which the conversion of the forest plays a central part. In conclusion, the article suggests that the key to environmental management must be for external agencies to articulate with the interests and values of those who hold a legitimate stake in African forest resources.

Résumé

Les préoccupations occidentals en matière de conservation ou de gestion des forêts tropicales africaines ont conduit à la formation de nombreux programmes de protection de l'environnement. La participation des communautés en matière de conservation forestière est devenue la norme dans ces programmes. Cependant, les propositions de participation des populations locales sous-entendent que la détermination de l'avenir de la forêt se résume purement et simplement à un conflit entre les différentes formes de conservation et la déforestation. De telles propositions sous-éntendent egalement que la présence de ces communautés ne pose pas de problèmes. Par contraste, cet article montre qu'un débat important s'est déjà instauré au sein de ces communautés concernant l'utilisation des forêts et leur conservation, principalement parmi les exclus de l'arène politique officielle et des prises de décision. Les préoccupations en matière d'environnement incluent une inquiétude sur la perpétuation de la société et représentent un prolongement clair des cosmologies des villages d'Afrique occidentale concentrées sur la sociétalisation de l'espace. Dans le même temps, l'objectif de conservation consistant à préserver la forêt en l'état éveille peu de résonances, les populations forestières considérant la société comme une construction ingénieuse, mais souvent problématique, dans laquelle la conservation des forêts joue un rôle central. Cet article suggère en conclusion que la clé d'une bonne gestion de l'environnement doit résider dans la prise en compte par les organismes extérieurs des intérêts et des valeurs de ceux qui ont des intérêts légitimes dans les ressources forestières africaines.

Type
Social capital: the fieldwork problem
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexandra, P. and Binet, J. 1958. Le Groupe dit Pahouin: Fang, Bulu, Beti, Ethnographic Survey of Africa, French West Africa, vol. 6. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Amanor, K. S. 1994. The New Frontier: farmers’ responses to land degradation. A West African study. Geneva: UNRISD; London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Ardener, E. 1975. ‘Belief and the problem of women’, in E., Ardener (ed.), Perceiving Women. London: Malaby Press.Google Scholar
Ardener, E., 1996. Kingdom on Mount Cameroon: studies in the history of the Cameroon Coast, 1500–1970. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.-F. 1993. The State in Africa: the politics of the belly. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brocklesby, M. A. 1996. ‘User Group Analysis for Participatory Forest Management in Sanje Village and Scipio, Rechtsfluss and Soden CDC Camps, West Coast, 15–23 April 1996’. Unpublished report, Limbe: Mount Cameroon Project.Google Scholar
Brocklesby, M. A., and Ambrose-Oji, B. 1997. ‘Neither the Forest nor the Farm … Livelihoods in the forest zone: the role of shifting agriculture on Mount Cameroon’. London: Rural Development Forestry Network, Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Cameroon National Archives, Buea, Qf/e 1946/1, ‘Bakweri Land Rights Petition’.Google Scholar
Cameroon National Archives, Buea, Qh/a 1932/1, ‘Womens' Anti-forestry Demonstration at Fish Town Abana’.Google Scholar
Cameroon National Archives, Buea, Qh/a 1926/1, ‘Cameroons Mountain Forest Reserve’.,Google Scholar
Cameroon National Archives Buea, Qh/a 1933/2, ‘Cameroons Mountain Forest Reserve.’Google Scholar
Guyer, J. 1984. Family and Farm in Southern Cameroon. Boston, Mass.: African Studies Center, Boston University.Google Scholar
Infield, M. 1988. ‘Hunting, Trapping and Fishing in the Villages within, and on the Periphery of, the Korup National Park’. Report 206/A9.6, Godalming: World Wide Fund for Nature.Google Scholar
Jeanrenaud, S. 1991. ‘A Study of Forest Use, Agricultural Practices and the Perceptions of the Rain Forest: Etinde Rain Forest, South-west Cameroon’. Unpublished report to Limbe Botanical Garden and Rain Forest Genetic Conservation Project, Limbe: Overseas Development Administration and Government of Cameroon.Google Scholar
Jua, Nantang. 1993. ‘State, oil and accumulation’, in P., Geschiere and P., Konings (eds), Itinéraires a'accumulation au Cameroun. Paris: Karthala. pp. 131–60.Google Scholar
Pan-African Institute for Development. 19731985. Village Studies (unpublished). Buea: Pan-African Institute for Development.Google Scholar
Richards, P. 1996. Fighting for the Rain Forest: war, youth and resources in Sierra Leone. London: James Currey, and Portsmouth, N. H.: Heinemann, in association with the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Sharpe, B. 1983. ‘Social Knowledge and Fanning Systems Research: ethnicity and the invisible farmers of northern Nigeria’. Proceedings of ARPT/Cimmyt Conference on the Role of Anthropology/Sociology in Farming Systems Research, Lusaka. Also published in African Social Research 38 (4).Google Scholar
Sharpe, B. 1997. ‘Forest peoples and conservation initiatives: the cultural context of rain forest conservation in West Africa’, in B., Goldsmith (ed.), Tropical Rainforest: a wider perspective. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Talbot, P. Amaury. 1912. In the Shadow of the Bush. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Thomas, D., Thomas, J., Bromley, W., and Mbenkum, F. T. , F. T. 1989. Korup Ethnobotany Survey. Two volumes, Godalming: World Wide Fund for Nature.Google Scholar
Vico, G. 1744. La scienza nuova. Third edition, trans, as The New Science of Gianbattista Vico, ed. Bergin, T. G. and Fisch, M. H.. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Watts, J. 1994. ‘Developments toward Participatory Forest Management on Mount Cameroon’. Limbe Botanical Garden and Rain Forest Genetic Resources Conservation Project, 1988–94, London: Rural Development Forestry Network, Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar