Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:44:22.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Turbulent Boundary-Layer Development on a Two-Dimensional Aerofoil with Supercritical Flow at low Reynolds Number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

C.J. Baker
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University
L.C. Squire
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University
Get access

Summary

Detailed measurements have been made of the boundary-layer development on a small two-dimensional aerofoil with supercritical flow and a weak shock wave, together with similar measurements on the tunnel side wall opposite the aerofoil surface. The Reynolds number of the test is similar to that found in the turbines of jet engines and there is a strong favourable pressure gradient ahead of the interaction of the shock with the boundary layer as often occurs in turbine blade passages. However, whereas the boundary layer on the aerofoil is thin and of the same thickness as that on a turbine blade, the thicker boundary layer on the wall is more typical of that on the hub or casing. The experimental results are compared with results from a wide range of calculation methods. One interesting conclusion from these comparisons is the fact that prediction methods which perform well for the thin boundary layers on the aerofoil do not necessarily perform as well for the thicker boundary layers on the wall.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Green, J.E., Weeks, D.J. and Brooman, J.W.F. Prediction of turbulent boundary layers and wakes in compressible flow by a lag-entrainment method. R.A.E. TR 72231, 1973 Google Scholar
2 Verma, V.K. A method of calculation of two dimensional and axisymmetric boundary layers. CUED/A-Aero/TR.3, 1971 Google Scholar
4 Bradshaw, P., Ferris, D.H. and Atwell, N. Calculation of boundary-layer development using and the turbulent energy equation. Jour. Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 28, p 593, 1967 Google Scholar
5 Inger, G. and Mason, W. Analytic investigation of transonic normal-shock boundary-layer interactions. Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State University. V.P.I. Aero Report 027, 1974 Google Scholar
6 Baker, C.J. The prediction of boundary layer development through a normal shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. CUED/A - Aero/TR. 10, 1980 Google Scholar
7 MacMillan, F.A. Experiments on Pitot tubes in shear flow. A.R.C. R. & M. 3028, 1957 Google Scholar
8 Quarmby, A. and Das, H.K. Displacement effects on Pitot tubes with rectangular mouths. Aero. Quart. Vol. 20, p 129, 1969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Van Driest, E.R. Turbulent boundary layer in compressible fluids. Jour. Aero. Sci. Vol. 18, p 145, 1951 Google Scholar
10 Bradshaw, P. and Unsworth, K. A note on Preston tube calibration in compressible flow. Imperial College Aero. Report 73-07, 1973 Google Scholar
11 Allen, J.M. Evaluation of compressible flow Preston tube calibration. N.A.S.A. TN D-7190, 1973 Google Scholar
12 Winter, K.G. and Gaudet, L. Turbulent boundary layer studies at high Reynolds numbers at Mach numbers between 0.2 and 2.8. A.R.C. R. & M. 3712, 1970 Google Scholar
13 Patel, V.C. and Head, M.R. Reversion of turbulent to laminar flow. Jour. of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 34, p 371, 1968 Google Scholar
14 Spalding, D.B. and Chi, S.W. The drag of a compressible turbulent boundary layer on a smooth flat plate with and without heat transfer. Jour. of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 18, p 114, 1964 Google Scholar
15 Kooi, J.W. Influence of free-stream Mach number on transonic shock wave boundary layer interactions. N.L.R. (Netherlands) M.P. 78013 U, 1978 Google Scholar