Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:55:28.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Buckling of Certain Optimum Plate Structures with Linearly Varying Thickness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

E. H. Mansfield*
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment
Get access

Summary

This paper is concerned with the buckling under uniform longitudinal compression of a variety of structures composed of plates whose thickness tapers linearly to zero across the section. Such structures include the angle of Fig. 1, the strut of cruciform section of Fig. 2 and the simply-supported strip of Fig. 3. For given cross-sectional area and overall dimensions (e.g. length of arm) the sections with linearly varying thickness achieve a greater buckling load (assuming that local buckling, rather than Euler buckling, is the criterion) than sections with any other smooth variation of thickness. These particular sections are therefore optimum sections and, even if they may not be used in practice, provide a convenient yardstick for purposes of comparison. The buckling loads are considerably greater than those for the corresponding “constant thickness” sections.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Timoshenko, S. Theory of Plates and Shells. McGraw-Hill, p. 195, 1940.Google Scholar
2. Mansfield, E. H. Leading Edge Buckling due to Aerodynamic Heating. Unpublished M.O.S. Report.Google Scholar
3. Trayer, G. W. and March, H. W. Elastic Instability of Members having Sections Common in Aircraft Construction. N.A.C.A. Report 382, 1931.Google Scholar
4. Capey, E. C. The Buckling under Longitudinal Compression of a Simply-Supported Panel that Changes in Thickness across the Width. A.R.C. Current Paper 235, 1956.Google Scholar