Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:01:02.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Class of Multi-Shock Interactions in a Perfect Gas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

L. F. Henderson
L. F. Henderson*
Affiliation:
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sydney)
Get access

Summary

The paper deals with a class of shock-wave systems that are of importance in the design and operation of supersonic intakes. It is shown that, when n− 1 wedge shocks, all of the same family, meet at a point, together with a tail shock and a bow shock, then the equations of motion which describe the flow near the shock confluence or junction are reducible to a polynomial equation of degree 10. Numerical results are obtained for the special case of the four-shock confluence and it is shown that, the number of solutions of physical interest, m4, may be 0, 2 or 4. It is found that the m4=0 solution can be interpreted physically in three different ways. These are a Guderley type flow, a confluence of three shocks with a Prandtl-Meyer expansion fan or the appearance of a shock system containing more than one confluence point. The methods developed also permit the discussion of multi-confluence wave systems and a number of examples are given. Finally, the Prandtl-Meyer compression fan is brought within the scope of the method by approximating it with a system of shock waves of weak intensity and minimum entropy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 1966 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Henderson, L. F. On the confluence of three shock waves in a perfect gas. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. XV, p. 181, May 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Henderson, L. F. The three-shock confluence on a simple wedge intake. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. XVI, p. 42, February 1965.Google Scholar
3. Henderson, L. F. Structure of the flow associated with a two-dimensional supersonic intake. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. XVI, p. 122, May 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Guderley, K. G. Considerations on the structure of mixed subsonic-supersonic flow patterns. Technical Report F-TR-2168-ND, Headquarters Air Materiel Command, Wright Field, Dayton, Ohio, USA, 1947.Google Scholar
5. Guderley, K. G. The theory of transonic flow. Pergamon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
6. Pain, H. V. and Rogers, E. W. E. Shock waves in gases. Reports on Progress in Physics (The Institute of Physics and the Physical Society), Vol. XXV, 1962.Google Scholar
7. Pack, D. C. The reflexion and diffraction of shock waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 18, p. 549, April 1964.Google Scholar
8. Ferri, A. Elements of aerodynamics of supersonic flows. Macmillan, New York, 1949.Google Scholar
9. Oswatitsch, K. Gas dynamics. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. I. Academic Press, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
10. Oswatitsch, K. Der Druckwiedergewinn bei geschossen mit Ruckstossantrieb bei hohen Uberschallgeschwindigkeiten (der Wirkungsgrad von Stossdiffusoren). Deutsche Versuchsanstalt für Luftfahrt, Bericht 49, 1957 (first published in 1944).Google Scholar
11. Henderson, L. F. Maximum total pressure recovery across a system of n shock waves. AIAA Journal, Vol. 2, p. 1138, June 1964.Google Scholar
12. Connors, J. F. and Woollet, R. R. Characteristics of flow about axially symmetric isentropic spikes for nose inlets at Mach number 385. NACA RM E54 F08, 1954.Google Scholar