Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:58:30.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Note on the Speed of Stall Propagation in a Cascade of Aerofoils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

F. Cheers  and
G. C. Funnell
F. Cheers
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
G. C. Funnell
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

From an investigation of published experimental results, it appears that three types of propagating stall cells occur on isolated blade rows. On stationary blade rows, and rotating rows which have the highest blade incidence at the tip, the speed of propagation seems to depend on a parameter based on the blade section near the leading edge, and in some experiments marked changes in this speed have been observed to coincide with changes in the form of stall on the individual blades. For rotating rows with the highest incidence at root or mid-section the speed of stall propagation lies within a fairly limited range and shows no dependence on the blade geometry. When the incidence is increased well beyond that at which stall first occurs, the stall cell pattern on most rotating rows changes from multiple cells to one or two of very large amplitude, with a marked change in speed of propagation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , May 1965 , pp. 179 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Carmichael, A. D. Stall Propagation in Compressors. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University, 1958.Google Scholar
2. Horlock, J. H. Axial Flow Compressors, Chap. 7. Butterworth, 1958.Google Scholar
3. Cheers, F. and Macartney, L. E. Propagating Stall in a Water Cascade Tunnel. National Research Council of Canada, Lab. Memo. G.D. 82, 1959. A.R.C. 22,382, 1960.Google Scholar
4. Richards, E. J. Note on the Stalling Properties of Wings. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 50 p. 888, 1946.Google Scholar
5. Gault, D. E. A Correlation of Low Speed Airfoil Section Stalling Characteristics with Reynolds Number and Airfoil Geometry. N.A.C.A. T.N. 3963, 1957.Google Scholar
6. Wood, M. D. Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Stall Propagation in Rows of Axial Flow Compressor Blades. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. X p. 345, November 1959.Google Scholar
7. Wood, M. D., Horlock, J. H. and Armstrong, E. K. Experimental Investigation of the Stalled Flow of a Single-Stage Axial Flow Compressor. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. XI p. 159, May 1960.Google Scholar
8. Stenning, A. H. and Kriebel, A. R. Stall Propagation in a Cascade of Aerofoils. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Paper No. 57-SA-29, 1957.Google Scholar
Stenning, A. H., Kriebel, A. R. and Montgomery, S. R. Stall Propagation in Axial-Flow Compressors. N.A.C.A. T.N. 3580, 1956.Google Scholar
Kriebel, A. R., Siedel, B. S. and Schwind, R. G. Stall Propagation in a Cascade of Aerofoils. N.A.C.A. T.N. 4134, 1958.Google Scholar
9. Costilow, E. L. and Huppert, M. C. Rotating-Stall Characteristics of a Rotor with High Hub-Tip Radius Ratio. N.A.C.A. T.N. 3518, 1955.Google Scholar
10. Rockett, J. A. Stall Propagation in Axial Flow Compressors. Pratt and Whitney Research Report No. 150, 1958.Google Scholar
11. Louis, J. F. Stalling Phenomena in Axial-Flow Compressors. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University, 1957.Google Scholar
12. Funnell, G. C. Investigation into Rotating Stall in Axial-Flow Compressors. M.Sc. Thesis, Manchester University, 1964.Google Scholar
13. Cheers, F. Note on the Change from Multi-Cell to Single-Cell Rotating Stalls. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Readers’ Forum, Vol. 24, 1957.Google Scholar
14. Emmons, H. W., Pearson, C. E. and Grant, H. P. Compressor Surge and Stall Propagation. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 77, 1955.Google Scholar