Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:46:23.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerodynamic Throttling of a Two-Dimensional Flow by a Thick Jet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

J B Stek  and
H Brandt
J B Stek
Affiliation:
Aerojet Liquid Rocket Company, Sacramento, California
H Brandt
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California
Get access

Summary

The velocity and pressure distributions in a flow generated by a thick air jet that throttles a confined airstream have been studied analytically and experimentally. Velocity and pressure measurements were made in a duct with a rectangular cross section of 102 mm height and 19 mm depth, through which air flowed at velocities ranging from 65 to 80 m/s. The airstream was throttled by a thick air jet having velocities ranging from 130 to 150 m/s that entered the mainstream at angles ranging from 60° to 135°. The jet-mainstream contour was found to be elliptical and agreement within six per cent was obtained between the theoretically and experimentally determined maximum height of the contour. Jet spreading was found to be linear. The theory permits determination of the velocity profile in the jet and gives velocities that deviate less than ten per cent from values obtained experimentally.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , August 1976 , pp. 229 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stek, J B Velocity and pressure distributions in the wake of a jet throttling a confined stream. PhD dissertation, University of California at Davis, June 1970.Google Scholar
2 Nunn, R H Brandt, H Aerodynamic throttling of two-dimensional nozzle flows. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol 23, pp 53–61, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Martin, A I The aerodynamic variable nozzle. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 24, pp 357–362, May 1957.Google Scholar
4 Brown, F T Advances in Fluidics. ASME, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
5 Abramovich, G N The Theory of Turbulent Jets. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1963.Google Scholar
6 Taylor, G I The use of a vertical air jet as a windscreen. Mémoires sur la Mécanique des Fluides, offerts a Riabouchinsky, Ministère de l’Air, 1954.Google Scholar
7 Bourque, C Newman, B G Reattachment of a two-dimensional incompressible jet to an adjacent flat plate. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol XI, pp 201–232, August 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Newman, B G The deflection of plane jets by adjacent boundaries – Coanda effect, Boundary Layer and Flow Control, edited by Lachmann, G V, Vol 1, pp 232–264, Pergamon Press, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
9 Ehrich, F F Penetration and deflection of jets oblique to a general stream, Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 28, pp 99–104, February 1953.Google Scholar
10 Wygnanski, I Newman, B G The reattachment of an inclined two-dimensional jet to a flat surface in streaming flow. CASI Transactions, Vol 1, No 1, March 1968.Google Scholar
11 Bowley, W W Sucec, J Trajectory and spreading of a turbulent jet in the presence of a crossflow of arbitrary velocity distribution. ASME Paper 69-GT-33, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Schlichting, H Boundary Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
13 Callaghan, E E Ruggen, R S Investigation of the penetration of an air jet directed perpendicularly to an air stream. NACA TN 1615, 1948.Google Scholar
14 Hinze, J O Turbulence. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
15 Kaufmann, W Angewandte Hydromechanik, II. Springer, Berlin, 1934.Google Scholar