Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:24:50.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pitch/Yaw Coupling Due to Roll of an Axisymmetric Missile with Autopilot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

P.W. Fortescue
P.W. Fortescue*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Southampton University
Get access

Summary

The types of pitch/yaw coupling which may result from roll motion of a conventional tail-controlled cartesian missile have been categorised. The consequences of the couplings upon:

  1. (a) the response to a step demand for manoeuvre, and

  2. (b) the decay of error in a beam-rider system are presented.

Potentially the most damaging forms of coupling are due to

  1. (a) mis-match of the Invariant Frames of airframe and servos,

  2. (b) angular mismatch between parts of the system, and

  3. (c) gyroscopic coupling.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , May 1982 , pp. 124 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shinar, J. Roll induced cross-coupling in two-dimensional systems. Israel Journal of Technology, Vol. 8, No. 1-2, pp 43-50, 1970 Google Scholar
2 Shinar, J. and Merhav, S.J. Effect of periodic roll rate in missiles with proportional navigation. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 13, No. 9, p 547, 1976 Google Scholar
3 Frary, D.J. The prediction of autopilot behaviour in the presence of roll motion. BAC Report ST5686, 1971 Google Scholar
4 Lange, B.O., Fleming, A.W. and Parkinson, B.W. Control synthesis for spinning aerospace vehicles. J. Spacecraft, Vol. 4, No. 2, p 142, 1967 Google Scholar
5 Fleming, A.W. Use of the properties of frequency symmetry and complex symmetry in the control of linear dynamical systems. Stanford University Report SUDAAR - 266, May 1966 Google Scholar
6 Bendrikov, G.A. and Ogorodnikova, V.I. Root trajectories of two-channel systems with anti-symmetric cross coupling. Automatron and remote control, Vol. 28, No. 4, p 661, 1967 Google Scholar
7 Barskii, A.G. Stability of two-channel automatic control systems with unrestricted gain of an antisymmetric connection. Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 29, p 171, 1968 Google Scholar
8 Krasovskii, A.A. Two-channel automatic regulation systems with antisymmetric cross connections. Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 17, p 139, 1956 Google Scholar
9 Fortescue, P.W. The generalized root locus (G.R.L.) method (for similar systems with antisymmetric coupling). Int. J. Control, Vol. 24, No. 4, p 477, 1976 Google Scholar
10 Fortescue, P.W. The control of axisymmetric spinning missiles. Southampton University Memo AASU 78/2, April 1978 Google Scholar
11 Iversen, J.D. Correlation of magnus force data for slender spinning cylinders. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 10, No. 4, p 268, 1973 Google Scholar
12 Fortescue, P.W. Control of a spinning missile using one pair of control surfaces. Southampton University AASU Memo 78/1Google Scholar