Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:12:03.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Matrix Analysis of Shell Structures with Flexible Frames

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

J. S. Przemieniecki*
Affiliation:
Bristol Aircraft Limited
Get access

Summary

A simple matrix method is presented for the deflection and stress analysis of cylindrical shell structures of arbitrary cross section stiffened by flexible frames. The method is an extension to fuselage structures of the Matrix Force Method developed by Argyris, in which the internal load system in the structure consists of two parts:—(a) synthetic load distribution, represented by the matrix b0, satisfying the external and internal equations of equilibrium, and (b) self-equilibrating load systems, represented by the matrix b1, which are introduced to satisfy compatibility conditions. The magnitudes of these self-equilibrating load systems are determined from the generalised compatibility equations formulated using the flexibility matrix f for the un-assembled elements of the structure. The self-equilibrating systems are non-orthogonal, but are arranged in such a way that the mixing between one system and another is kept to a minimum and, consequently, the resulting compatibility equations are well-conditioned. The three basic matrices, b0, b1; and f, are compiled using only very simple formulae. The matrices b0 and b1 depend on the geometry of the structure, while the flexibility matrix f is a function of geometry and elastic properties. The present analysis is applied to cut-out problems in fuselage structures. It can also be used for problems involving thermal loading and diffusion of loads in curved panels stiffened by flexible frames.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Levy, S. Computation of Influence Coefficients for Aircraft Structures with Discontinuities and Sweepback. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 14, October 1947.Google Scholar
2. Langefors, B. Structural Analysis of Swept-Back Wings by Matrix Transformation. Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget (SAAB) Technical Note No. 3, Linköping, Sweden, 1951.Google Scholar
3. Langefors, B. Analysis of Elastic Structures by Matrix Transformation with Special Regard to Semimonocoque Structures. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 19, July 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Wehle, L. B. and Lansing, W. A Method of Reducing the Analysis of Complex Redundant Structures to a Routine Procedure. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 19, October 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Denke, P. H. A Matric Method of Structural Analysis. Proceedings of the Second U.S. National Congress of Applied Mechanics, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1954.Google Scholar
6. Denke, P. H. and Boldt, I. V. A General Digital Computer Programme for Static Stress Analysis. Douglas Aircraft Company Report, March 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Denke, P. H. The Matric Solution of Certain Non-Linear Problems in Structural Analysis. Douglas Aircraft Company Report, also Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences Preprint No. 507, 1955.Google Scholar
8. Turne, M. J. et al. Stiffness and Deflection Analysis of Complex Structures. Journal of the. Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 25, September 1956.Google Scholar
9. Argyris, J. H. Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis, Part I: General Theory. Aircraft Engineering, Vol. 26, October, November 1954; Vol. 27, February, March, April, May 1955.Google Scholar
10. Przemieniecki, J. S. Matrix Analysis of Fuselage Structures. Bristol Aircraft Limited, Technical Office Report No. 104, February 1957.Google Scholar
11. Argyris, J. H. and Kelsey, S. The Matrix Force Method of Structural Analysis and Some New Applications. R. & M. 3034, February 1956.Google Scholar
12. Argyris, J. H. and Dunne, P. C. The General Theory of Cylindrical and Conical Tubes under Torsion and Bending Loads. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 51, February, September, November, 1947; Vol. 53, May, June, 1949.Google Scholar
13. Hoff, N. J., Salerno, V. L. and Boley, B. A. Shear Stress Concentration and Moment Reduction Factors for Reinforced Monocoque Cylinders Subjected to Concentrated Radial Loads. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 16, May 1949.Google Scholar