Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:25:53.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Base Cavities on the Aerodynamic Drag of an Axisymmetric Cylinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

Thomas Morel
Thomas Morel*
Affiliation:
General Motors Research Laboratories
Get access

Summary

Base cavities (hollow extensions mounted behind the rear end of a bluff body) are known to reduce substantially the aerodynamic drag of two-dimensional bodies. For axisymmetric bodies their effect is not well established, and the objective of this work was to assess their drag-reducing potential. Experiments were performed using three different types of base cavities, one solid walled and two ventilated, each with six different depths ranging from 0.1 to 0.9 body diameters. All three types of cavities reduced the body drag for small cavity depths, with a maximum drag coefficient reduction of 0.027 being obtained with a ventilated cavity 0.2 diameters deep. The reductions are an order of magnitude lower than those reported for two-dimensional bodies, but are achieved with a much shorter cavity depth. Although the ventilated cavities had a beneficial effect for small depths, at large depths (greater than 0.5 diameters) they had an opposite effect – a very large drag increase. The cause of this increase is as yet not understood. Hot-wire investigation revealed that base cavities suppress wake periodicity. For cavities of small depth this correlated with a reduction in drag, but for large cavity depths the trends of the intensity of the periodic motion and of drag were not always the same.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , May 1979 , pp. 400 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Roshko, A. On the drag and shedding frequency of two-dimensional bluff bodies. NACA TN 3169, July 1954.Google Scholar
2 Tanner, M. A method for reducing the base drag of wings with blunt trailing edge. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. XXIII, p 15–22, February 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Nash, J.F. A discussion of two-dimensional turbulent base flows. Aeronautical Research Council, R&M No. 3468, 1965.Google Scholar
4 Maull, D.J. Mechanisms of two and three-dimensional base drag. Proceedings of Symposium on Aerodynamic Drag Mechanisms, Editors Sovran, G., Morel, T., and Mason, W.T. Jr., Plenum Press, 1978, pp 137–153.Google Scholar
5 Mair, W.A. Drag-reducing techniques for axisymmetric bluff bodies. Proceedings of Symposium on Aerodynamic Drag Mechanisms, Editors Sovran, G., Morel, T., and Mason, W.T. Jr, Plenum Press, 1978, pp 161–179.Google Scholar
6 Osborne, J. and Pearcey, H.H. Unpublished work performed at the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England, 1960.Google Scholar
7 Nash, J.F., Quincey, V.G. and Callinan, J. Experiments on two-dimensional base flow at subsonic and transonic speeds. Aeronautical Research Council, R&M No. 3427, 1963.Google Scholar
8 Goodyer, M.J. Some experimental investigations into the drag effects of modifications to the blunt base of a body of revolution. University of Southampton, ISAV Report No. 150, 1966.Google Scholar
9 Compton, W.B. Effect on base drag of recessing the bases of conical afterbodies at subsonic and transonic speeds. NASA TN D-4821, 1968.Google Scholar
10 Smith, P.A. The plane jet growth rate as influenced by a wall in the plane of the nozzle. Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 78, p 384–385, 1974.Google Scholar
11 Van Wagenen, R.G. A study of axially-symmetric subsonic base flow. PhD Thesis, University of Washington, Mech. Eng. Dept., 1968.Google Scholar