Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:17:18.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Transient Excitation in the Dynamic Analysis of Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. G. White*
Affiliation:
The Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, The University of Southampton

Extract

In recent years many methods have been proposed for the measurement of the frequency response of linear systems but the method most often used in the study of structures is the steady state vector response method, the natural frequencies and damping ratios being measured from the resulting vector diagrams. This method is tedious and time consuming and often cannot be readily applied outside the laboratory. Some effort has been directed in the past to employ quasi-steady state methods such as the slow frequency sweep technique but errors are introduced because the response at resonance is less than the steady state maximum and the frequency at which the maximum occurs is shifted in the direction in which the excitation frequency is changing. Additional errors are introduced in the analysis of the system response because of the necessary averaging time of the function analyser used to derive the vector diagrams. Some refinements in technique have been proposed by Reed who developed the “λ Law” frequency sweep in which the percentage change in frequency per cycle is constant. This offers some reduction in test time when compared with logarithmic and linear frequency sweeps but a knowledge of the minimum damping likely to be encountered at any resonant frequency within the sweep range is essential so that the method may be employed advantageously.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kennedy, C. C. and Pancu, C. D. P. Use of vectors in vibration measurement and analysis. Journal of Aeronautical Science, Vol 14, pp 603625, 1947.Google Scholar
2. Hok, G. Response of linear resonant systems to excitation of a frequency varying slowly with time. Journal of Applied Physics, Vol 19, pp 242250, 1948.Google Scholar
3. Reed, W. H. Effects of a time varying test environment on the evaluation of dynamic stability with application to flutter testing. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, pp 435-443, 1958.Google Scholar
4. Mercer, C. A. Use and application of a digital data analysis system. Recent Advances in Stress Analysis, New Con cepts and Techniques and their Practical Application, JBCSA Conference. 26-29 March 1968 Royal Aeronautical Society 1969.Google Scholar
5. Clarkson, B. L. and Mercer, C. A. Use of cross-correlation in studying the response of lightly damped structures to random forces. AIAA Journal, Vol 12, pp 22872291, 1965.Google Scholar
6. Skingle, C. W. A method for analysing the response of a resonant system to a rapid frequency sweep input. RAE Tech Report 66379, December 1966.Google Scholar
7. Thrall, G. P., Pope, D. A. and Otnes, R. K. Studies of frequency response function measurements using swept sine inputs. Measurement Analysis Corporation report MAC 506-10, May 1966.Google Scholar
8. White, R. G. Measurement of structural frequency response by transient excitation. ISVR Tech Report 12, January 1969.Google Scholar
9. Skingle, C. W. A low frequency voltage tuned oscillator having a very short response time. RAE TN Struct 315, June 1962.Google Scholar